Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perry is blowing it (Needs better grasp of issues, stamina to pick apart Romney's contradictions)
Washington Examiner ^ | 09/23/2011 | Philip Klein

Posted on 09/22/2011 9:10:58 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Mitt Romney is an incredibly vulnerable Republican candidate, from his numerous policy reversals to his championing of the Massachusetts health care law that served as the basis from Obamacare. But for him to lose, somebody else has to beat him. And like Tim Pawlenty before him, Texas Gov. Rick Perry is blowing his chances to exploit Romney’s weaknesses.

The defining moment in this debate may well have been the point at which Perry went on the attack against Romney for being a flip flopper. As I noted earlier, there’s a long file to choose from. And Perry had clearly rehearsed such an attack – you can tell he was starting to go through the list of issues Romney had reversed on, and even used the “for it before he was against” phrasing, a not-so-subtle reference to the infamous Massachusetts flip flopper, Sen. John Kerry. But the exchange came toward the end of the debate, and as has been his habit, Perry began to fade as the debate wore on. During this particular answer, he wrestled for words and stammered. He couldn’t finish his sentences. If you weren’t a political junkie who knew all of the background, you’d have no idea what Perry was mumbling about. And Romney's smooth response made him come off as more steady and reassuring, even though on substance, Perry should have owned him.

The rest of the debate was hit or miss for Perry. But when he received an admittedly difficult question about what he would do if he got a 3 a.m. phone call informing him that Pakistan’s nukes had been taken over by Islamists, he struggled. He ended up giving an incoherent answer that was more of an information dump of random stuff he had been briefed on about the region. It was not very reassuring for those of us who are waiting to see if Perry can prove his dissenters wrong and come off as someone substantive, capable of beating President Obama, and of running the country competently.

Romney remains vulnerable. And unlike Pawlenty, Perry is starting from a stronger position in the polls, so he certainly has a good chance of ultimately winning. However, he’s going to have to step up his game by showing a better grasp of the issues, more stamina in these debates, and by being able to take apart Romney’s endless contradictions. In short, Perry has not blown it, but he is blowing it.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; mittromney; potus; rickperry; rinoperry; rinorick; weakperryvsromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last
To: dogcaller
Sadly, Pres. Obama has taken some major steps towards reelection in recent weeks, and he didn't even have to lift a finger to do it.

Our second tier conservative candidates successfully eviscerated the front running conservative (who was woefully unprepared to fight off their attacks).

Of course, that all but hands the nomination now to Willard Romney. Look for lots of exposes on scary Mormons, discussions of RomneyCare being the model for ObamaCare, and a credible third party challenger from the right after the nomination has been formally secured.

We have taken what should have been a slam dunk election against the worst President in history, and have utterly blown it.

I suggest some of you guys drink heavily and celebrate the Perry implosion now, because the Obama hangover that is coming next fall might just finish us all off.

41 posted on 09/22/2011 9:48:07 PM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: no dems
There is only two possible outcomes ... Perry wins this early, or Perry wins a long drawn out battle with Romney. But make no mistake, in the end Perry will win.

Romney will win:
new hampshire
michigan
arizona
vermont
maryland
connecticut
rhode island

and Perry will win everything else, mark my words. This will be a repeat of the 2000 primaries with Perry playing the part of Bush and Romney playing the part of McCain.

42 posted on 09/22/2011 9:48:19 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Rick Perry 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ummmmm. Can someone remind me how many REAL debates obama engaged in? How did he handle the press during the primaries and more importantly after Hilly bowed out?


43 posted on 09/22/2011 9:50:32 PM PDT by Ladysforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
If Romney wins South Carolina, Perry will drop out shortly thereafter.

At this point, I see that as a very real possibility.

44 posted on 09/22/2011 9:51:56 PM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
No one watches these debates.

I agree. This debate doesn't matter in itself. However, Perry needs to prove he can play, sometime in a debate.

45 posted on 09/22/2011 9:52:54 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
There are 9 more debates. Next, Oct 11 at Dartmouth College in Hanover, NH. After that in Las Vegas.

Perry has plenty of time to regroup and get prepared.

Lets all remember the terrible performance Reagan had in debate #1 against Mondale in 1984? He was an old man who recovered nicely. Perry can too.

46 posted on 09/22/2011 9:53:01 PM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

lol

The mormon Romney will win South Carolina right after the sun stops shinning for good.


47 posted on 09/22/2011 9:53:50 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Rick Perry 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

I do take it personally, I am heartless unlike Obama who he has “high respect” for.


48 posted on 09/22/2011 9:53:54 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt
Romney is now the prohibitive favorite. We lose even if we win.

Not a stinkin' chance. The day Romney wins the nomination is the day I start campaigning for the strongest conservative 3rd party candidate.

See tagline.
49 posted on 09/22/2011 9:55:21 PM PDT by Antoninus (Take the pledge: I will not vote for Mitt Romney under any circumstances. EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Finally, someone remembers how poorly many of our past winners have performed in debates.

They really are not that important, about one step above giving a single speech to a crowd.


50 posted on 09/22/2011 9:55:22 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Rick Perry 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Perry sucked tonight. Okay, we move on.

One question. Does anyone know why Perry didn’t appear with Hannity after the debate? Was he pissed off or something? I know he was on last night with Sean. But this seemed very odd.


51 posted on 09/22/2011 9:58:09 PM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Well, what are you gonna do when good people like Sen. Jim DeMint and former Gov. Sarah Palin or even a bare-knuckles fighter like Chris Christie, refuse to get into the race? You play with the hand you’re dealt.

Nope. You fold and wait for the next hand.
52 posted on 09/22/2011 9:58:21 PM PDT by Antoninus (Take the pledge: I will not vote for Mitt Romney under any circumstances. EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

What really matters in these debates is not giving your opponent any new additional fodder they didn’t already have for future ads. Because it’s all about the ads folks. Perry will have all the chance in the world articulate and clarify his positions and to hammer Romney till he looks like the bag of RINO crap that he is.

Perry is getting hit with what he was going to get hit with regardless, nothing really new has come up, and thus nothing has fundamentally changed, except for some to realize that yep... Debates are not Perry’s strong point.


53 posted on 09/22/2011 9:59:57 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Rick Perry 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Perry is not a Leader. He wants to educate all illegal children at bargain basement rates. Race to the bottom with Perry.


54 posted on 09/22/2011 10:01:39 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

you have to keep in mind that we need the latino vote to win big,perry may be losing some of the white vote,but will still carry a chunk of the latino vote. I think it’s going to be very close in the end.


55 posted on 09/22/2011 10:01:55 PM PDT by The_Obama_Gerbil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44
“Can you give me any idea how well Perry is thought of?”

I would have to say reasonably well, with an asterisk next to it.

The Governor of Texas is kind of a unique job. The legislature only meets every other year, and the governor has relatively small amounts of power. In my opinion, when the decisions have been his to make, Perry has made the correct calls. By that I means conservative. That thing with the vaccine was kind of bungled.

The biggest complaint I've heard from many conservatives down here is that he's kind of a Punxsutawney Phil. When it's time for election he's out there, saying and doing all the right things. After he's elected he kind of disappears into his stump until it's time to wake up again. I'm not sure I really hold with that because the Governor of Texas really has limited power, so I'm not sure there is a lot he could do if he wanted to.

Perry has had a pretty sympathetic legislature to work with all the time he's been Governor. I really don't know how he'll perform when he has to get in there an mud wrestle with those scumbags in Congress. (At one time I thought maybe 2012 would give us a solidly conservative congress, and maybe it will. For some reason I'm starting to have my doubts).

56 posted on 09/22/2011 10:02:58 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

>>>Romney for being a flip flopper

I wish Perry would be a flip flopper on illegal immigration.

Especially during this time of HUGE UNEMPLOYMENT among legal citizens of all income groups.

Why is he not against illegal immigration? Why? Why?


57 posted on 09/22/2011 10:03:31 PM PDT by Hop A Long Cassidy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
He has screwed himself regarding his bowing to illegals and foreign policy.

He was an embarrassment, I watched the debate to hear him for the first time amidst the others. He was far worse than I even thought he would be. Wooden, inarticulate, wrong, pandering, and I gather he told a bold faced lie about the Gardisil episode.

He was also the only candidate booed tonight, and he was booed twice, deservedly so.

58 posted on 09/22/2011 10:06:25 PM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Many people are acting as if debates are the only way of campaigning and winning elections. Get real folks, debate are just a minor part of the campaign. Frankly most people who get so agitated by the debates are the political junkies. Many politicians you know have won the debates and lost the elections badly.

Perry would go after Romney more effectively in real face to face campaigning with the voters, speeches, and of courses political ads. These have much more impact on winning elections and are much more effective than the debates.

59 posted on 09/22/2011 10:08:02 PM PDT by jgge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Exactly. The political junkies are all obsessed with debates as if they are the most important thing to win elections when in reality there are rather minor. Political ads, face to face campaigning with voters, and speeches are the way to win elections as proven historically.


60 posted on 09/22/2011 10:08:11 PM PDT by jgge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson