Now That Homosexuals Can Serve 'Openly' Will They Obey DoD Directives?

Department of Defense - Directive ^ | Sept. 23, 2011 | RetSignman

[RetSignman]

SUBJECT: Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces

References: (a) DoD Directive 1344.10, “Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces on Active Duty,” August 2, 2004 (hereby canceled)

(b) Sections 973, 888, 101, and Chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code

(c) DoD Instruction 1334.1, “Wearing of the Uniform,” October 26, 2005

(d) Section 441a of title 2, United States Code

(e) through (i), see Enclosure 1

[KittenClaws]

The idea that gays will simply turn sissy and run away from the rigors of the military is not one we should hang all our hope on. There are better hopes than that.

This is a case where "a few bad apples will spoil the whole bunch". Yes, there are gays who can excel as soldiers, under the discipline of DADT - but openly gay? No way.

[elkfersupper]

Great.

Now operational readiness is going to suffer while somebody is checking on their butt-buddy.

[RetSignman]

[Now operational readiness is going to suffer...]

Not if EXISTING military directives are ENFORCED and followed. (chect the link I supplied to the current directives)