Posted on 09/26/2011 7:56:20 PM PDT by circumbendibus
The dispute over Barack Obama's eligibility to be president erupted during the 2008 election campaign and featured among others a lawsuit filed on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes against California election officials who did not check whether Obama was eligibile. Now the 2012 campaign is charging ahead at full throttle, and the issue is still alive.
That's because the case was before the U.S. Supreme Court for a conference today. A conference is a meeting at which the justices decide which cases they will review. To date, none of the Obama eligibility challenges that have reached the high court have been accepted. It could be as long as a week or more before an announcement comes from the court.
Attorney Gary Kreep of the U.S. Justice Foundation is handling the case.
"If the U.S. Supreme court agrees to hear this case, and we pray that it will, it will send shock waves through the Washington political establishment," Kreep said. "It will mean that the Supreme Court is going to follow the lead of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals justice who has publicly commented that this is an important constitutional issue."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Another story about Axelrod comparing Zero to the Titanic, with some neat graphics:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2784446/posts#19
They mean, to impeach the questionable president? That begs the question of whether the person qualifies to be a president. He could argue in turn that an accusation of becoming regarded as president by fraud rules out impeachment because then he’s not a president.
They are telling us clearly what’s on their mind. Since losing Weiner’s/Schumer’s seat in NY-9, Obama is obsessed w the fact that the hated [in his mind] Jews are in a position to sink his re-election. Sweet, sweet irony. He is too foolish to realize that throwing Israel under the bus and backing back and forth over it, in an effort to kill it, is an action w consequences. Now his chickens are coming home to roost. LOL!!!
Axelrod sees the writing on the wall. He knows he’s aboard the Titanic and the fatal collision is inevitable. How he will handle it I don’t know, but he has told us in so many words that he knows what’s up ahead.
Ineptitude/marxism - you can only hide them so long.
Congress has always had the power to investigate the President and remove him from office via impeachment. Federal courts have historically refused to get involved in issues that the Constitution leaves to the elected branches.
That being said, every state has a procedure in its election laws where a candidate on the ballot can challenge the eligibility of another candidate. No candidate invoked any of these laws in 2008; they can be invoked by any candidate in 2012, although most states have a very narrow window in which such challenges can be filed.
The system broke down and failed us this time. Butter has done really excellent, yeoman’s work in detailing how it happened. You can find her analysis on other threads; it’s too in-depth to reproduce every time the subject comes up.
Obama is the essence of what the Framers tried to protect us from. When they specified ‘natural born citizen’ they didn’t mean, ‘half foreign’. Those who think that was their intent suffer from viewing the Founders through the eyes of liberal Political Correctness. The Founders weren’t concerned with protecting the rights of foreigners to spawn future presidents, nor did they care which foreign enemy’s feelings they hurt. They were looking to protect the country from foreign-thinking foreign-influenced half-Americans who would come to office under a veil of secrecy and proceed to fundamentally change the Republic.
Well, that nightmare scenario is happening right before our eyes. The Founders knew best.
I don’t get it, is THAT supposed to represent a map of the American West?
If so, I think you may have correctly identified the culprit!
It’s missing two states: Arizona and New Mexico. I don’t get it either. Why did they cut the country off above the Mexican border?
Proverbs 23:7
“For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he.”
I have often referred to that verse, since Hussein has occupied our White House. It explains so much about him.
Aha, that sounds like it, thank you. Copying to my files...
Maybe they’re anticipating giving AZ and NM to La Raza.
That thought occurred to me, but at first it didn’t make sense because La Raza really wants CA, which is further along the Mexicanization route than the other two. But maybe they need to hang onto CA because it is so big electorally and so reliably Dem, but they’re willing to toss AZ and NM over.
It’s a possibility, anyway; w this crew, nothing un or anti American is a non-possibility.
Wasn't Dr. Alan Keyes a candidate on the ballot in CA? Or, Gail Lightfoot?
What about Dr. Wiley S. Drake, Sr. or Markham Robinson?
Weren't they all denied standing?
None of them brought a proper elections challenge under the California Government Code. They waited too long, and then sued in federal court.
The 3 states highlighted in White are supposed to match the cities.
The White House is saying Denver is in Wyoming.
Washington...Seattle
California...San Jose, LA, San Diego
Wyoming...Denver
Okay; now I get it. But I think you’re being a little harsh. If you calculate where those cities would be after dividing the US into 57 or 59 states, the WH could end up being right after all. ;)
here ya go..
http://blogs.denverpost.com/thespot/2011/09/27/oops-white-house-goofs-on-western-geography/40949/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.