“And it’s maddening that there is no way to get a read out of the Court as to what the proper way IS to get a redress of this grievance.”
One way you might consider would be to read the original court’s opinion, that the higher courts have so-far affirmed, which includes:
“The Secretary of State persuasively argues that the appropriate remedy for an issue concerning the qualifications of a President is an action before the United States Congress pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution and 3 U.S.C. section 15.” — Superior Court of California for the County of Sacramento, Keyes v. Bowen
They mean, to impeach the questionable president? That begs the question of whether the person qualifies to be a president. He could argue in turn that an accusation of becoming regarded as president by fraud rules out impeachment because then he’s not a president.