Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

401(k) Tax Changes May Be On Fast Track
The Street ^ | 09/23/2011 | The Street

Posted on 09/28/2011 6:16:03 PM PDT by Rusty0604

In the coming weeks, Americans could face sweeping changes to the tax deferral status and funding strategies of their retirement plans.

(Excerpt) Read more at thestreet.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 0; 0bama; 0bastard; 112th; 401k; bho44; biggovernment; communism; confiscation; democrats; govtabuse; liberalfascism; lping; marxism; medicare; obama; obamanomics; rapeofliberty; rapeoftaxpayers; redistribution; retirement; socialsecurity; taxes; theft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Cashing out in 2008 without messing with it would make you a multi-millionaire over-nite.


41 posted on 09/28/2011 7:31:14 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

A lot of people are raising a family when they are young and can’t save a lot. The catch up provision helps people that can finally afford to save more during their last working years.


42 posted on 09/28/2011 7:31:54 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Just wait till they try to confiscate the gold. AGAIN.


43 posted on 09/28/2011 7:50:46 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

I know a lot of people lost all their gold in boating accidents.


44 posted on 09/28/2011 7:53:39 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Great more certitude under which to make a decision.

This is the problem with political leadership - death by a thousand cuts. You don’t help the patient by cutting slowly and over time.

We need a leader to say ‘Here’s what we’re going to do. It will be painful, but at the end we’ll be stronger and better for it.’ Get it over with already - take the losses and let’s move on.


45 posted on 09/28/2011 7:53:55 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Post it.


46 posted on 09/28/2011 7:57:37 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman
Every one of us should make the same calculation as should the government. Then the government should give us the equivalent amount in say land, mineral and other lease rights, buildings, surplus equipment and all the other things that they hold that they have no business holding.

Outstanding idea.

47 posted on 09/28/2011 8:06:05 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Let me cash out and pay a flat 15% tax on the sum (and NO penalties) and I’d be out of my employer sponsored 401k in a heartbeat.


48 posted on 09/28/2011 8:20:09 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Understood. I’m not saying the catch-up provision is a bad idea. I’m just pointing out that a modification of this provision is hardly a draconian overhaul of the 401(k) rules, when you consider that it didn’t even exist until a few years ago.


49 posted on 09/28/2011 8:21:23 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
For one thing, reducing the maximum that can be contributed by those 50 and older under the "catch-up" provisions of the tax code for 401(k) and IRA accounts isn't all that big a deal.

I'm pretty sure that it is that big a deal if you happen to be 50 or over and need to catch up on your contributions to your retirement savings. This is how smart government confiscation of private savings goes - small increments and focused targeting that leaves your neighbor saying he doesn't think it's all that big a deal.
50 posted on 09/28/2011 8:27:37 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

And the return on SS gets really bad if you die before you get to collect any of it back.


51 posted on 09/28/2011 8:29:43 PM PDT by Newtoidaho (Fight organized crime. Vote out all incumbent Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Right you are. This Administration is also laying the legal groundwork for capital controls right now to keep wealth from fleeing the country. And a reporting system that lays the groundwork for a wealth tax.


52 posted on 09/28/2011 8:45:00 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (You know, 99.99999965% of the lawyers give all of them a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: berdie

later


53 posted on 09/28/2011 8:47:58 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Check this piece of logic (or sh..)from the lefty Brookings:

“The purpose of the retirement income system is to promote an adequate retirement, not to promote tax sheltering through 401(k)s,” testified William Gale, a co-director of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center at the Brookings Institution.”

I see, sheltering income is not related to funding an adequate retirement. That is as insane a statement as any other such as the rich pay lower tax rates than do those who are moderate earners.

This is not going to end well...either the left wins and they take away everything anyone has worked for and thereby puts everyone in the gulog or REV 11 starts. Neither is a win for the country.


54 posted on 09/28/2011 8:57:53 PM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

One more point, an 18% credit on earned income for retirement. Hum, on the surface, wow, a credit. The down side is one needs how much income to generate enough tax due to qualify for a decent contribution. Most people in the 125K range right now pay an effective tax rate around 18%, or 22500...so 18% of that is tada a whopping 4K.

Zero and the dems can take that 18% and stuff it where the sun don’t shine.


55 posted on 09/28/2011 9:03:09 PM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Forget 401Ks. I don’t contribute to mine anymore. I don’t want the US Govt as my partner in retirement. They will change the rules on the 401Ks, if not outright confiscation of them altogether, later - mark my words. The counterparty risk of the 401K is way too high, IMHO. I’ll pay the taxes now, thank you very much.


56 posted on 09/28/2011 9:04:22 PM PDT by bkopto (Obama is merely a symptom of a more profound, systemic disease in American body politic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

And don’t forget, money that grows in a 401 is subject to ordinary tax rates when taken out.

Take the money and invest in long term investments and hope they don’t increase the cap gains tax too much. Of course, that is the next target of the Zero and his minions.

Welcome to the Gulog.


57 posted on 09/28/2011 9:07:28 PM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
This is not going to end well...either the left wins and they take away everything anyone has worked for and thereby puts everyone in the gulog or REV 11 starts. Neither is a win for the country.

well, maybe they've done the math and figure it will turn out well for them, heheh.

58 posted on 09/28/2011 9:14:52 PM PDT by no-s (B.L.O.A.T. and every day...because some day soon they won't be making any more...for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman
Then the government should give us the equivalent amount in say land, mineral and other lease rights, buildings, surplus equipment and all the other things that they hold that they have no business holding. Twofold benefit, people made whole and government reduced: win-win.

I think you're on to something there - Senior Creditors are we the people through the SS Ponzi fund. Then everyone else, politicians and foreign gov't last. Reduce the gov't to what can be funded by the NRST. No income tax ever legal again.

This idea is worth developing.

59 posted on 09/28/2011 9:33:13 PM PDT by no-s (B.L.O.A.T. and every day...because some day soon they won't be making any more...for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman

A new kind of “homestead”.....altho I really think this gov’t would rather sell our assets to China....


60 posted on 09/28/2011 9:46:36 PM PDT by goodnesswins (My Kid/Grandkids are NOT your ATM, liberals! (Sarah Palin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson