Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Signs China Is Going Bust
TMO ^ | 9-29-2011 | Justice Litle

Posted on 09/29/2011 6:13:17 PM PDT by blam

More Signs China Is Going Bust

Economics / China Economy
Sep 29, 2011 - 12:04 PM
By: Justice Litle

While the world fixates on Europe, signs of a China crash are mounting behind the scenes.

Imagine you run a business with 3,000 employees. Your factories churn out 20 million pairs of sunglasses per year -- the best-selling brand in China. You are a celebrated businessman in your region, with expanded interests in real estate and solar energy.

Oh, and one more thing: You are flat broke.

As it turns out, your company borrowed huge sums at high interest -- more than cash flow could justify -- and you have no hope of paying the loans back. Now the business is insolvent. What do you do?

If your name is Hu Fulin, you run away.

"The east China city of Wenzhou is battling its own subprime crisis," Shanghai Daily reports, "after seven local business owners fled." Wenzhou, the "cradle of China's private economy," is China's latest ground zero for a credit boom gone bust.

Hu Fulin is one of the seven "runaway bosses" who, faced with insurmountable debts, decided to hit the road this month, "leaving thousands of employees in a state of shock and enormous unpaid loans in hundreds of millions of yuan."

When Mr. Hu disappeared, his suppliers panicked too. Large payments were owed, along with two months' salary for thousands of employees.

The Wenzhou crisis is dubbed "subprime" because the state-owned banks pulled back, allowing private lenders to step in at sky-high rates. The loans being defaulted on had subprime rates of interest.

The Chinese government attempted to cool off reckless lending by putting restrictions on the state-owned players. All they accomplished was a juicy handoff to others to take on more risk, in exchange for subprime lending terms.

And the net result? Bosses fleeing as loans implode. "Thousands of employees in a state of shock." A ripple of destruction all down the supply chain... and a possible tipping point in the whole Ponzi-financed boom that counts Chinese real estate as its white-hot center, as greed morphs into fear.

The Wenzhou bust comes against a backdrop of warning signs for China's broader economy. The dragon had already lost a step, as evidenced by manufacturing data declines.

"The country's huge manufacturing sector is starting to slow," the NYT reports, "and orders are weakening, especially for exports. The real estate bubble is starting to spring leaks, even as inflation remains stubbornly high."

But what about the rich?

As in the United States, it's the wealthiest portion of Chinese society that drives spending (and thus equity valuations). Those who can afford luxury apartments and Hermes scarves matter a lot more than subsistence farmers.

Here too there is trouble. "Sounding the latest alarm about slowing economic growth in China," the WSJ reports, "Mercedes-Benz on Friday said luxury-car sales gains slowed in what has been its fast-growing major market."

After 60% growth in the first half of 2011, the pace of Mercedes sales decelerated in July and August. The rich are paring back.

Yet more warning signs abound. Last week, Chinese property stocks were hit hard on fears of a financing crunch. Various Hong Kong-listed developers fell more than 10% in a single day.

"Initially, people were worrying about earnings," said Agnes Deng of Baring Asset Management. "What happened is that people started to worry about balance sheet problems as well as cash flow and funding."

Cracks in the façade are widespread. Property prices are dipping in many cities after "a sharp decline in sales volumes," the Financial Times adds. Shanghai real estate transactions are down more than 50% year-on-year.

Guess who is in the middle of all this? "China's economy is very distorted, and the banks, as ever, are at the epicenter of the distortions," says Edward Chancellor of Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo. "If China runs into problems with the banking system, which I think it will, I cannot see a situation in which foreign investors are the main priority of Beijing."

It is hard to pinpoint the bursting of a bubble. But for China the warning signs abound, with free-falling copper prices a quiet confirmation. Even as the world focuses on Europe, a full-on China bust could have greater impact than many realize.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; currencywar; economy; monkeys; orientals; recession; tradewar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: blam
After 60% growth in the first half of 2011, the pace of Mercedes sales decelerated in July and August. The rich are paring back.

Who'd have thought that Oblame-a's Screw America Agenda would eventually take a chink out of China's trade armor? It takes a vibrant economy to sell a lot of cheap sunglasses AND expensive Mercedes.

Look, Oblame-a is working overtime to keep the private sector broke and the public parasite sector rolling in clover by sucking all the cash in the world into his Govt. Hoover Vacuum. And, it's working.

It wasn't advertised very well, but the world is now getting the fact that capitalism is losing in the USA as long as this fraud sleeps on a White House pillow. Look for the Union Label on said pillow.

I think we should wait until others have demonstrated that you can 'tax yourself into prosperity' before we go there. China probably thinks so too.

21 posted on 09/29/2011 7:13:25 PM PDT by budwiesest (It's that girl from Alaska, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Maybe Pres. Obama will give them a speech and tell them what they should do to fix their debt problem.


22 posted on 09/29/2011 7:19:12 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

lol.

They already had a stimulus program.... they built entire empty cities that nobody can afford to live in.


23 posted on 09/29/2011 7:20:50 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The empty cities are bizarre.

It seems like something is going on. However, this doesn’t mean, necessarily a crash is imminent. There could be other peaks before the crash, or no crash at all.


24 posted on 09/29/2011 7:28:17 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

Some of us called for this crash quite some time ago.


25 posted on 09/29/2011 7:37:26 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blam

Not really sure I understand the humor in trying to pretend China’s economy is in some sort of trouble.

China is demolishing America’s economy. Taking our jobs. Taking our factories. Taking our money. Taking our technology.

And all we do is make jokes.


26 posted on 09/29/2011 7:40:17 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ("Cut the Crap and Balance!" -- Governor Sarah Palin , Friday August 12 2011, Iowa State Fair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

So apparently, the latest economic strategy is to squash China in order to keep her sexy services cheap.


27 posted on 09/29/2011 7:40:57 PM PDT by familyop ("Don't worry, they'll row for a month before they figure out I'm fakin' it." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Some of us called for this crash quite some time ago.

One day you will be quite right.

I'm not being critical, but busts are a hard thing to time.

I remember the dotcom bust in 2000. There was an article in Barrons about the amount of cash the high fliers had, the burn rate and the projected time until they all fizzled. Well, that information should bave been enough to scare all prudent investors miles away. The frenzy, however, lasted another two years with huge gains before the ultimate crash.

28 posted on 09/29/2011 7:55:15 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: blam

No matter how bad the Chinese economy gets, even if they collapse, the government will still report some 8% to 10% growth in GNP.


29 posted on 09/29/2011 8:04:52 PM PDT by adorno (<)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Who is on first? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejweI0EQpX8


30 posted on 09/29/2011 8:09:55 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webstersII; cableguymn
I am pretty sure the Chinese own not just long-term bonds but shorter-term notes and other paper. The point is that much of what they own comes up for renewal periodically and the simple fact is that if the Chinese and others do not roll over these loans at regular intervals, the United States simply cannot pay them off.

Add to this the fact that the Fed has announced, apparently reluctantly, that it has purchased 95% of this debt since June and one is confronted with the uneasy feeling that we are extremely vulnerable if not already in deep trouble.

I stand back and look at the world picture and ask where can all this growth at around 10% be expected to come from in the world's 2nd economy if it's markets, Europe and America, are on the verge of recession? China is primarily an export economy, its domestic economy is inadequate as yet to carry it or provide it with the growth it needs to prevent civil upheaval. China is the 3rd leg of a three-legged stool and the other 2 legs, Europe and America, are already in big trouble.

If we cannot send money to China for flatscreen TVs they cannot send money to us to buy our bonds and notes. The paper chase finally comes to an end.

That is what the price of copper is telling us and that is what the decline in the value of gold is telling us, that the world is heading for deep recession and probably deflation which the governments will try to cure with inflation. Ominously, Goldman Sachs has come out this week and frankly advocated such a course, citing FDR's new deal in support.

I do not see how any of this ends well.


31 posted on 09/29/2011 8:16:35 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

China is not TAKING anything other than what foreign business GIVE it and what foreign governments allow. Point your anger at the Congress for not instituting tarrifs, as they should, because our Congress puts extra costs for environmental issues in the US that China does not require. Make it a level playing field, and China can’t compete (or remove the regulations here and we CAN compete.)
One or the other.


32 posted on 09/29/2011 8:17:52 PM PDT by ImaGraftedBranch (...By reading this, you've collapsed my wave function. Thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ImaGraftedBranch

Tariffs - yeah, that’d be the ticket Mr. Smoot, or are you Mr. Hawley?


33 posted on 09/29/2011 8:19:10 PM PDT by Oceander (Not voting is tantamount to voting for Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Oatka
PLEASE NOTE THAT I AM NOT SAYING I AM A CHINA EXPERT, BUT!!!...

I have been working in Zhengzhou for over a year. Much - at least - of what they purport about the CBD East District development is BS.

Now on the one hand, it is government policy that decides when there will be an addition like this, and the ZZ Economic and Technological Development Zone, where the people I consult for are HQ’d. (Used to be farmland - now an active, growing manufacturing area.)

As near as I can tell, first “they” build it (govt policy and plan, using private contractors and developers) and then “they” (businesses and people) come.

The CBD is more and more crowded, just in the past year I have been here, as people move up in life, and move into newer and more expensive digs.

Of course, this area is nowhere near like the crowded downtown neighborhoods of ZZ, or any typical China city.

(Interesting item - number of cities officially over 1 million population per most-recent census: US-9 CHINA-171+)

The CBD is COMPLETELY not a “ghost-town” part of ZZ - this is just wrong. It is just less crowded, more like the US, actually.

I do not go to the high-rise area shown so don't know about that, but the area near the CBD “circle” has more and more low-rise CONDOS and apartments (note 70-yr China home-leases instead of ownership, this is weird I admit) by the growing upper and upper middle classes. And people live there. (Note, in the US we no longer “own” any property anymore. Don't pay your property tax and see who REALLY owns it.)

Overall, China is an amazing place! Construction cranes everywhere. New developemtns / buildings spring up like dandelions. They do things here more like we used to do things in the US. The last place I worked in the US (a private spinoff of a division of a US corporation) literally took 3 years to DECIDE to adopt one of the first recommendations I made in one technical area.

Here - sometimes when I have made a presentation and proposal - they are acting on it the next day. The next day.

US - 18 months to acquire and install a certain large test lab apparatus. Here - 5 months.

And, at least in the private sector with the Chinese I work with, from owners thru the salaried engineers, and the (admittedly small number) hourly folks I've worked with - they are in MY EXPERIENCE are a fine bunch of people. Friendly. And with a real sense of humor and enjoyment.

OK. This is just my one slice of life/business/people/culture here, 1 set of experiences. BUT it is 100% a real and absolute reality that -I- have seen.

And I am NOT “just” an American - I'm a Texan. AS far as I'm concerned, that is like American-on-steroids.

Some of their government NOW is totally fouled up and bad.

News flash - they don't have a monopoly on this!

WHAT if we do NOT replace Obama next election? We are heading down the slippery part of the slope, going faster and faster toward the precipice!

The US form of government AS CONSTITUTED AND INTENDED is without a doubt the best concept EVER conceived and enacted, and always will be.

But like the guy BF said, “A Republic, if you can keep it.”

http://www.bartleby.com/73/1593.html
http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/659-qa-republic-if-you-can-keep-itq

AND SOMETHING ELSE:

SEE http://www.lorencollins.net/tytler.html

A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years.

Great nations rise and fall. The people go from bondage to spiritual truth, to great courage, from courage to liberty, from liberty to abundance, from abundance to selfishness, from selfishness to complacency, from complacency to apathy, from apathy to dependence, from dependence back again to bondage.

SO DON”T THINK I AM NOT PRO AMERICA!

But just damn, the place I grew up in the 50’s and 60’s...

the Eisenhower/Kennedy/Nixon(Ford)/Reagan/(Bushes?) USA,

has been / is being overwhelmed and corrupted by the

Johnson/Carter/Clinton/Obama USA.

I added Kennedy to the first list, because between military service, tax cuts, etc. I think that's more where he belongs.

And I was generally disappointed with the Bush Presidencies. OK they are good guys and did good things, but... So while they clearly do NOT belong in the second list, I am not 100% about them in the first. Thus the parenthesis. Texas notwithstanding.

(Ford was not elected President... so that's why he gets parenthesized.)

As far as the second list is concerned? Read it and weep.

SO - back to China.

I think cooperation between the PEOPLES, recognizing their inherent strengths, abilities and potentials of the two countries, is imperative. Because the people are the nation. We at least knew that once. “We The People...”

But clearly, both governments need to be fixed.

If -this- happens over the next 2 generations / 40-50 years, where China and the US a partners, and “well-governed”, then maybe the world will end up being a good deal and a good place for a LONG time. Like centuries to millenia.

For China, it WILL need at least two generations, with their entrenched system, to change in the right ways. But it could happen.

For the US, we need to make a severe course-correction PDQ. ASAP. Like next November.

This next US Presidential election will be the most consequential in my life.

IMHO

34 posted on 09/29/2011 8:28:54 PM PDT by muffaletaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

Oh, for sure, but when people are writing it off as a blip on the road, even in the middle of the drop, that to me is the time to step in and say, look, no.

There are good reasons for decreasing Chinese demeand at this point.


35 posted on 09/29/2011 8:30:11 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: blam
Hu Fulin

This is satire right? Hu fulin?

36 posted on 09/29/2011 8:48:28 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Those declining spot prices for copper could have a negative effect on the US. We’ll be Darwining far fewer idiot copper thieves.


37 posted on 09/29/2011 9:03:12 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

They’ll want their money they loaned us early.


38 posted on 09/29/2011 10:00:07 PM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
They’ll want their money they loaned us early.

This is a somewhat popular but utterly preposterous misconception that is promoted by leftists in pursuit of their evil agenda.

The fact of the matter is that a United States Treasury Bond is a contract that specifies a stream of payments that are to be made on a fixed schedule. The holder of the bond has no contractual right to demand that any payments be made on any schedule other than that which was agreed to upon issuance.

39 posted on 09/29/2011 10:31:07 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

I know that.

I was just explaining what the term meant.


40 posted on 09/29/2011 10:37:53 PM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson