Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Howard Dean: Tea Party 'Not Playing With Full Deck' [Must-See Dean Photo]
NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 10/05/2011 5:14:04 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

Bulletin from the Bureau of Pot-Meet-Kettle: Howard Dean has declared that Tea Party Americans "are not playing with a full deck." This not merely from the man who made The Scream famous, but who in the very same segment today had a manic tongue-sticking-out moment [see screen grab] that might have scared pets and small children.

Dean also managed to get into a spirited fight with Michael Steele over Obama's 2012 prospects. Dean claims to see an Obama transformed, a candidate "on fire" who is on course to win. Steele soberly pointed to the 9.1% unemployment rate. View the video here.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackobama; bloggersandpersonal; howarddean; michaelsteele; teaparty

1 posted on 10/05/2011 5:14:11 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...

Crazy Howie claims Tea Party “not playing with full deck.” Don’t miss the photo of Dean ping to Today show list.


2 posted on 10/05/2011 5:15:03 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (FReepmail or ping me to be put on my ping list for criticism of liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Howard (Belltower) Dean.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
3 posted on 10/05/2011 5:17:11 AM PDT by cripplecreek (MLB Playoff thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2786167/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Said one of the craziest **'ers ever to enter into politics.

LLS

4 posted on 10/05/2011 5:18:35 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Is the person that you support a Crony Capitalist... A.K.A. CRAPITALIST?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Yeeeeeee Haaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!


5 posted on 10/05/2011 5:19:42 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Actually, Dean's analysis of the situation is spot-on. Romney could very well win the nomination. And if he does, the Tea Party could indeed go off the rails and hand Obama re-election.

What Dean means by "not playing with a full deck", it seems to me, is that the Tea Party has adopted an all-or-nothing mindset. It is on display here on FR every day.

Just think about what all or nothing means. What are the odds of getting it all? What does that leave?

"When I began entering into the give and take of legislative bargaining in Sacramento, a lot of the most radical conservatives who had supported me during the election didn't like it.

"Compromise" was a dirty word to them and they wouldn't face the fact that we couldn't get all of what we wanted today. They wanted all or nothing and they wanted it all at once. If you don't get it all, some said, don't take anything.

"I'd learned while negotiating union contracts that you seldom got everything you asked for. And I agreed with FDR, who said in 1933: 'I have no expectations of making a hit every time I come to bat. What I seek is the highest possible batting average.'

"If you got seventy-five or eighty percent of what you were asking for, I say, you take it and fight for the rest later, and that's what I told these radical conservatives who never got used to it."

Ronald Reagan, An American Life


6 posted on 10/05/2011 5:24:16 AM PDT by Huck (Save a pretzel for the gas jets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Dean Reloaded!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwto2s_FbnI


7 posted on 10/05/2011 5:25:34 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

LOL!!


8 posted on 10/05/2011 5:31:45 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

The abortionist himself, eh?


9 posted on 10/05/2011 5:31:46 AM PDT by onedoug (If)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

FWIW...that’s exactly what will probably happen. In the end...DC gets the candidate they want and need. For DC...Romney/Obama are two sides to the same coin. Either continues to acrue power and resources to the Borg.


10 posted on 10/05/2011 5:34:13 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Bell tower”! LOL! Fits him perfectly!


11 posted on 10/05/2011 5:44:46 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Last time was checking the deck was full and the House was filling up too, not to mention the Senate. Howie is living in an alternate universe! One of his own delusions. Typical of democRATS.
12 posted on 10/05/2011 5:46:01 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

From the Christian Science Monitor:

“Howard Dean: tea party is ‘last gasp’ of generation that fears diversity”

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/monitor_breakfast/2011/0105/Howard-Dean-tea-party-is-last-gasp-of-generation-that-fears-diversity

“Former Democratic National Committee Chair Howard Dean characterizes the tea party as ‘almost entirely over 55 and white.’ He says tea partyers are driven by the economy but also discomfort about the nation’s demographic changes. “

My question is what has Howard Dean been smoking? Answer: Terminal Ignorance.


13 posted on 10/05/2011 5:46:01 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

While there is slight differences between Obama and Romney.. Not enough of one to get me to vote for him.

I’ll work hard for those down the ticket, but I’ll have to be in a really good mood to vote for Romney.

Ya, ya, ya a vote for anyone but the guy at the top with an R is a vote for Zero.. And here I thought it was a vote for the person I selected.


14 posted on 10/05/2011 5:51:06 AM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Throw it back at him.

There are at least 2 cards conservatives don’t use - the race card and the scare old folks card.


15 posted on 10/05/2011 5:51:46 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia (Still believing...Sarah 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Most Conservatives well remember what we got after the 2004 election. That is why many are taking a hard line stance. I have had a belly full of “ reach across the aisle” crap. Romney is an elitist, big money, big government guy. All of the thousands of democrat bureaucrats and government employees would love to see Romney win.
16 posted on 10/05/2011 5:52:04 AM PDT by MCF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Huck; mo

Mitt will NOT be the nominee. However, the path is wide open for him to try and win it..but he won’t. His core base of support has stayed between 25-30%, and now, over the next 4-6 weeks, he has to show the ability to grow it. He won’t, and when he fails to add to his poll numbers, then the rest of the GOP base will coalesce around a real conservative. It could well be Cain, unless Palin does decide to get it..


17 posted on 10/05/2011 5:54:40 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the EARTH...it's the ONLY planet with CHOCOLATE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn

Mood has nothing to do with it for me. It’s a very simple choice. I usually don’t love either candidate, and yet picking the better of the two is a simple thing.


18 posted on 10/05/2011 5:55:36 AM PDT by Huck (Save a pretzel for the gas jets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MCF

After the 2004 election we got a second term of a mediocre/bad president.


19 posted on 10/05/2011 5:58:08 AM PDT by Huck (Save a pretzel for the gas jets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Tea Party 'Not Playing With Full Deck'

Classic Democrat vs Republican contrast.

20 posted on 10/05/2011 6:00:41 AM PDT by McGruff (Vetting - The process of examination and evaluation of a candidate's record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Dean is trying to play pinochle with a poker deck.


21 posted on 10/05/2011 6:01:32 AM PDT by CPOSharky (The only thing straight, white, Christian males get is the blame for everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Come here and say that, Howie!


22 posted on 10/05/2011 6:16:06 AM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

“After the 2004 election we got a second term of a mediocre/bad president.”

The Congress was worse. I firmly believe that is what caused the hardline stance, I know it has with me.


23 posted on 10/05/2011 6:19:14 AM PDT by MCF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Actually, Dean's analysis of the situation is spot-on. Romney could very well win the nomination. And if he does, the Tea Party could indeed go off the rails and hand Obama re-election.

NEWS FLASH!!! If Romney wins the nomination, it won't be the Tea Party that goes off the rails. It will be the entire republican party. People WILL stay home, and not only will Obambi win, but several other races that the republicans MIGHT have won will be lost because CONSERVATIVES (remember us???) chose to stay home.

Read it and weep - if the republicans continue to play "liberal lite", they will continue to lose. I mean, what's the sense in voting R when there's so little difference between R and D?

24 posted on 10/05/2011 6:20:13 AM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

:-)


25 posted on 10/05/2011 6:26:55 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Is the person that you support a Crony Capitalist... A.K.A. CRAPITALIST?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Crazy Howie claims Tea Party “not playing with full deck.”

That may be slightly true. I think the Tea Party is playing with only 51 of the cards, because DEAN is playing with the only one remaining.

26 posted on 10/05/2011 6:43:45 AM PDT by Real Cynic No More (OBAMA!!'s name is all caps as sarcasm to indicate a lack of respect, as he does not deserve it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Well, well, Howard Dean.....just the other day, I was wondering what had happened to this escaped mental patient.

Now I know.


27 posted on 10/05/2011 6:51:02 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Obama inherited a mild recession from George W. Bush and turned it into a major depression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Spot on.

All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.


28 posted on 10/05/2011 6:57:55 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
“not playing with full deck.”

Only, because, Dean and the Bolshies have half the deck up their sleeve.

29 posted on 10/05/2011 7:18:08 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (I'll follow an eloquent Allen West out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Howard aaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggghhhhhhhhhh Dean is a clown who lost his circus.


30 posted on 10/05/2011 7:20:03 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MCF

IIRC, the GOP picked up seats in 04. THEN they blew it. THEN they lost seats in 06.


31 posted on 10/05/2011 8:45:05 AM PDT by Huck (Save a pretzel for the gas jets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Huck

The TEA party has adopted a minimum standard - which apparently is anathema to the GOP establishment.


32 posted on 10/05/2011 8:48:00 AM PDT by MortMan (What disease did cured ham used to have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
The TEA party has adopted a minimum standard

Exactly. They want a candidate with the least experience possible.

33 posted on 10/05/2011 8:49:38 AM PDT by Huck (Save a pretzel for the gas jets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Huck

No - They want a candidate with a minimum amount of conservatism. For many, Romney doesn’t rise to that minimal level.

If Romney wins the nomination and conservatives, who are already warning of the possibility, cannot stomach their quadrennial political seppuku, I am sure you will be more than obliging to blame those sentient enough to foresee the predictable outcome.


34 posted on 10/05/2011 8:55:18 AM PDT by MortMan (What disease did cured ham used to have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: meyer
If Romney wins the nomination, it won't be the Tea Party that goes off the rails. It will be the entire republican party. People WILL stay home, and not only will Obambi win, but several other races that the republicans MIGHT have won will be lost because CONSERVATIVES (remember us???) chose to stay home.

Right. That's exactly what Dean is saying, and I agree with him. If the Tea Party loses the primary contest, they will choose Obama over the GOP nominee. They will prove themselves to be completely off the rails bat-shirt crazy.

Normal responsible people understand that you can't always get what you want--especially in politics. They understand that when the primaries are over, you get to pick between two choices, and it usually isn't even that tough to find the better choice.

But the Tea Party is morphing into the Tantrum Party. All-or-nothing. If they do what you say, they will obliterate whatever is left of their credibility, and will force the GOP to move LEFT in search of votes. The Tantrum party will be the new libertarian party--one-percenters on the outside looking in. Pure losers.

35 posted on 10/05/2011 8:58:35 AM PDT by Huck (Save a pretzel for the gas jets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
They want a candidate with a minimum amount of conservatism.

That's what they're going to get. You know, just because you want something doesn't mean you're going to get it. If the Tea Party wants a good candidate, they should find one. In the meantime, rational people understand we have to work with what we've got.

You want a Tea Party president? Then get some Tea Party governors to serve and prove themselves. Instead they latch onto a gadfly congresswomen unfit for the Oval Office, and a pizza franchiser who couldn't win a GA primary, and they expect to win?? And then if they don't, they'll blame the winner? LOL.

36 posted on 10/05/2011 9:01:39 AM PDT by Huck (Save a pretzel for the gas jets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Huck
But the Tea Party is morphing into the Tantrum Party. All-or-nothing. If they do what you say, they will obliterate whatever is left of their credibility, and will force the GOP to move LEFT in search of votes. The Tantrum party will be the new libertarian party--one-percenters on the outside looking in. Pure losers.

No, the Tea Party isn't morphing into the tantrum party. You're bordering on the ridiculous to justify yet another leftist RINO republican. We can't afford another liberal in the White House. You would think that the repubLICKan party, since their losses in 2006, might come to the realization that the conservative majority in this country doesn't want what they've been offering. But no, they have to keep pushing the "get-along" RINO candidates because "it's their turn".

I fail to see how you would think that the republican party could possible move any farther left and not call itself the democrat party anyway, what with all the "reach-across-the-aisle" RINO idiots like McCain, Graham, and the two bimbos from New England carrying the party's banner.

The party lost me as a supporter in 2006 when they tried to force amnesty down our throats. I'm an independent conservative. If they offer a reasonable candidate, I'll vote for that candidate. If they don't, I won't. It's that simple.

37 posted on 10/05/2011 12:35:13 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: meyer
I'm not trying to justify anything. I think the establishment GOP and the Tea Party have BOTH failed miserably to produce a solid candidate. It's pathetic of the GOP, and it's sad for the Tea Party.

The GOP is a national party, and the best they can muster is Perry and Romney. It's amazing how pathetic that is.

Meanwhile, the Tea Party can't do better than a franchiser and a gadfly congresswoman. Someone else can shake their pom-poms, talk about how any of them would be better than Obama, blah blah. I'm calling it like I see it.

All that said, for me it's a no-brainer to vote for whatever mediocrity wins the GOP nomination, whether it's the establishment mediocrity or the Tea Party mediocrity. To do otherwise, imo, is insane.

38 posted on 10/05/2011 12:48:32 PM PDT by Huck (Save a pretzel for the gas jets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: meyer
The party lost me as a supporter in 2006

You mean you're one of the people who gave us Speaker Pelosi and Obamacare? Nice going. Good strategy.

39 posted on 10/05/2011 12:53:07 PM PDT by Huck (Save a pretzel for the gas jets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
This never fails to lift my spirits:

The Dean Scream

40 posted on 10/05/2011 12:58:28 PM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Huck
You mean you're one of the people who gave us Speaker Pelosi and Obamacare? Nice going. Good strategy.

No, I'm not one of the people that gave us Speaker Pelosi and Obamacare. You'll have to find some democrat voters to blame for that. And, perhaps, some republican party leadership that keeps bringing us such great candidates as Juan McCain.

When the party wants to return to conservatism, freedom, and the constitution, then I may support the party. When they stop pre-selecting winners in primaries, I may support them. When they quit trying to out lib the liberals, I may support them. Otherwise, I only support conservative individuals.

41 posted on 10/05/2011 1:15:04 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: meyer

Thanks for Pelosi-Reid. Way to go!


42 posted on 10/05/2011 1:17:49 PM PDT by Huck (Save a pretzel for the gas jets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: giotto

I never got what the big deal was about the scream. To me it was media hype to get rid of an insurgent. The fix was in.


43 posted on 10/05/2011 1:19:36 PM PDT by Huck (Save a pretzel for the gas jets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]




Click the Pic               Thank you, JoeProBono

Follow the Exciting Adventures of Gary the Snail!

Abolish FReepathons
Go Monthly

Planning to donate $10 or more?
YOU can sponsor a New Monthly Donor
FReepmail TheOldLady

44 posted on 10/05/2011 1:38:22 PM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Huck
Thanks for Pelosi-Reid. Way to go!

Neither Pelosi nor Reid are within the reach of my vote. The worst you can say is that I (reluctantly) helped bring you Bob Corker. He's only about 43% RINO.

45 posted on 10/05/2011 2:24:47 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Huck

You’re so right. Dean was surging in the polls. But that scream was heard 24/7 for the next week, and he was out of there. Sure, it was funny, and I can’t blame the late night hosts for running with it, but the so-called serious media blew it all out of proportion. I don’t remember the John Kerry bunny suit picture being plastered on every newspaper and TV.


46 posted on 10/05/2011 3:03:21 PM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: giotto

Thanks for posting the video link of the Dean Scream. That was his “last hurrah” so to speak. LOL.


47 posted on 10/05/2011 3:25:55 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Ditto. I’m really tired of all the Romney truth file cr*p.


48 posted on 10/07/2011 6:13:56 PM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson