[montag813]

Zogby has no credibility whatsoever.

[Steamburg]

But, Zogby has far more credibility than Mittens and the rest of the Obamacare flippers.

[Kartographer]

"Zogby has no credibility whatsoever."

Especially when its not your candidate that they show in the lead.

[so_real]

Zogby has no credibility whatsoever.

Notoriously liberal perhaps, but saying it has zero credibility is without merit. Even if Zogby has agenda built into its numbers, with spreads as wide as the ones reported there is no doubt an element of reality reflected in the trends, if not the numbers themselves. It is irrefutable that Cain is surging across the board. Romney is stagnant. Perry and Bachmann have taken hits. Those are facts even if it is Zogby reporting them.

[Tonytitan]

Zogby has no credibility whatsoever.

That can be said if we are talking about Zogby in isolation. If Zogby's results start/are being reflected by Rasmussen, Gallup and the networks, then what we have here, ladies and gentlemen, is called a trend.

[Hawthorn]

Zogby has no credibility whatsoever.

Except:

When he produces results we like. Then he's the most credible guy on the planet!

(Remember Rush's "love affair" with Zogby back in 2000? That's when Zogby really became a nationally known figure.)

[StAnDeliver]

"Zogby has no credibility whatsoever."

Don't disturb the noobs.

"Zogby is the Dick Morris of polling"

I would rather hear the Toe-Sucker ramble on Fox for 10 minutes than even glance at another Zogby poll. Zogby is a fraud. Period.

The only poll out there that has any kind of valid statistical methodology backing it (+/-3 registered, but +/-6 GOP likely, on a small sample) is the CBSNews poll (and I won't link to it); that's how bad pre-primary polling traditionally is -- to have to cite CBS over Zogby. 2012 can't come too soon...