I do not mean the following to say that abortion is anything less than an unconscionable horror, same as murder is.
But are the poorer statistics for avoiding breast cancer associated with having an abortion, mirrored by those who adopt out their newborns and don’t breast feed?
One needs to be a bit careful about the questions one might imply.
The Susan M. Komen co-option of the pink ribbon is a worse issue, because she’s not shy about cheering PP, the turd in an otherwise reasonable punch bowl.
I encourage all conservative women to have three or more children not for health but to dominate the Left by sheer numbers alone.
What a shame that people are largely unaware of this.
I’ll admit I own a few of those goofy pink ribbon items, but that goes back to the days when I was ignorant. Now, I avoid that like the plague. I also avoid business that give to PP. And my daughter will NEVER be part of the Girl Scouts who also deny the dangers of OC & abortion, have string ties to PP, and are essentially an arm of the UN by promoting their children’s rights crap.
People have no idea how entrenched this evil is in our culture. SGK & this pink ribbon garbage is only the tip of the iceberg.
I support women’s breasts
I'd caution people to buy into anyone’s assertion that mammograms are unnecessary for women under a certain age. I don't fall into any of the risk categories this article mentioned, yet I have had an annual mammogram and sonogram since I turned 35 and I'll do so for the rest of my life.
I’ve always wondered about the lower risks for developing breast cancer since most people don’t have a lot of kids. I recently had my sixth and have been either pregnant or breastfeeding since I was twenty.
Big and bouncy or small and sexy... They all deserve our attention!!
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
This is an extremely important article, as it says, "the elephant in the room", bigger than a gorilla. Breast cancer has increased 40% since abortion became forcibly legal in every state; additional risk factors are hormanal contraceptives and putting off or having no children. If the medical profession was not cowardly, this would be explain clearly to every woman in every doctor's office.
Regarding breast feeding, I read long ago a study done in a SE Asian community wherein the inhabitants had a (very odd!!) custom of mothers feeding the babies only on one side, can't remember which side. When they got breast cancer, it was generally in the breast not used for feeding infants.
I don’t buy this for a minute. Women that never give birth at a higher risk for breast cancer?? BS. Some women can never have kids, and will not likely face breast cancer. And to suggest women are only good for giving birth, and to mandate women give birth, is insulting, tyrannical and evil.
There is more to life than having kids, many couples and singles are perfectly content and healthy without kids. What is good for some, is not necessarily the case for others.
They are immune to criticism on two fronts: sympathy and sex.
Who doesn't want to be nice to breasts?
This is a scam par excellence.
I detest all this pink stuff too, and especially how it pops up everywhere during football season in October.
I could not dislike this Goodell idiot any more.
Pro-Life bump