Posted on 10/12/2011 3:11:14 PM PDT by Kaslin
When Rush went national, Ronald Reagan was president. Twenty-three years later, we have a Marxist president. Good thing Rush was around to help delay the loss of our country. He did a great job. /sarc
I think Sarah Palin, I am not sure. I know he did not endorse McCain
When Gingrich is good, he is very, very good.
When Gingrich is bad, he is horrid.
“...its clear why hes not onboard yet. ..”
Cain would have to sabotage himself pretty mightily to place him out of the running.
I suppose those are the breaks when you’re left with slim pickins’.
You are jumping to conclusions. There is no guarantee that Romney will even be the nominee
Greenspan was kind to his businesses.
Greenspan had a soft gold standard in the 80 and 90s which was the era that Cain referred to. The not Bernack.
Greenspan did go soft after the iraq war.
“When Gingrich is bad, he is horrid.”
In the primary? NO ONE!
You can ask the same question for 2004, 2000, 1996 and 1992 and the answer will remain the same.........,..
Rush has NEVER endorsed a candidate in any primary election!
Rush is doing exactly what he should do, give the audience the best analysis and insight he can and let the people make the decision.
Ya fight the drive by's with knowledge, not endorsements.
I wish were. I never post anymore.
Romney looks unstoppable with money, org and no unforced errors.
[cue up picture of mcenroe...]
In the PRIMARY, NO.......and please refer to my prior post. Thank you
She wasn't on the scene until it was down to the general election -- McCain/Palin vs. Obama/Biden. So obviously he'd support the GOP ticket in that instance, no matter who was on it. I'm talking about an early endorsement -- before or at the very beginning of the GOP primaries. And I found the answer: http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/05/rush-limbaugh-endorses-mitt-romney/
Rush is.....an entertainer.
It would be nice if he acted like the future of America hangs in the balance for 2012.
Because it does.
Rush has never endorsed anyone in the primarys........
All have room to grow in this primary season, to fill in areas where they are seriously lacking. If Perry made it clear that he grokked the contemporary concern that amnesty to illegales would be a lasting national liberal/Democrat take-over in the making (they’re not going to vote against spoils to themselves) then maybe 20-30% more Republicans would be comfortable with him. It’s OK I suppose to have a heart but it’s foolish to “love” America into a Democrat dystopia.
The problem with Cain’s 999 plan is that when you flip it over you see that the devil is in the details.
9% national sales tax
no more home mortgage deduction
no thanks.
You are wrong too. It was the LSM who nominated McCain. I voted for McCain in the general election. He was not my first or second choice, but I will not waste my vote to vote for someone that does not have any chance to get elected
Yea, and since you dropped into a Rush forum, ya might want to move on..........
Greenspan’s easy-money policies created the dot com bubble in the 1990s. And after that boom went bust, in order to soften the recession, he eased up on credit even more. And all that went into the housing market, creating yet another bubble.
They say that everybody — Wall Street, Main Street — got drunk with greed. But the real question is, Who provided the alcohol?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.