Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/14/2011 4:48:55 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

I am voting for the content of his character not the color of his skin.
Donate to WWW.hermancain.com if you want to see him win.


2 posted on 10/14/2011 4:54:55 AM PDT by Donnafrflorida (Thru HIM all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Recalling the old saw that he who controls the meaning of words controls the outcome of a debate, according to the liberal Plastic Reality, only one of these candidates is “black”.

When Nobel Prize winning poet Tony Morrison, who is African-American, can write an October 1988 New Yorker article titled “Clinton as the first black president”, then what is “black”? When the NAACP calls the black conservative Kenneth Gladney, “not black enough”, and “not a brother” then what is “black”? When Time magazine’s Jack White calls Supreme Court Justice Thomas, “the scariest of all the hobgoblins”, saying “Washington seems to be filled with white men who make black people uneasy”, than what is “black”? And when Obama, a man whose mother is Caucasian, can tell us in a widely read autobiography that in his youth he struggled with his racial identity before *deciding* to be black, what is “black”?

When Bill Maher, during a panel discussion on HBO complains that Obama’s policies are “half-assed” “because he’s only half black.” and that “if he was fully black, I’m telling you, he would be a better president.”, and that “there’s a white man in him holding him back”, than what is “black”?

“Black” in all these contexts, as well as Juan Williams’s complaint on Fox News that the extraordinarily lopsided expression of Missouri voter sentiment in August of 2010 rejecting ObamaCare was really about race, is clearly not about “race”. It is about ideology, socialist ideology.

With respect to BHO being black: it is not about the racial characteristics he was born with, it is about the ideology he adopted. It is not what percent black he is, it is about how thoroughly red he is.


3 posted on 10/14/2011 4:59:03 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The contrast between Cain and 0bama couldn’t be more stark.

I am growing weary of so many columns always adding some ‘longshot’ disclaimer with regards to Herman Cain.

I see more and more coverage, especially on TV, where you can see the positive impact he is having. Steve Hayes, Juan Williams, Bret Baier, of course, Neil Cavuto. Even Chris Wallace got out if his chair on his Sunday morning show to shake Mr.Cain’s hand. THey recognize the real deal when they see it. He is genuine. Now Art Laffer and Paul Ryan weighing in adding some gravitas to his ideas.

The man exudes positive attitude, something this country sorely needs.


4 posted on 10/14/2011 5:04:01 AM PDT by SueRae (I can see November 2012 from my HOUSE!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Obama is black? The analysis of his genealogical chart shows that he is 50% Caucasian, 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro..... Tell me again how that makes him ‘black’? The only way this can be the case is for him to be a ‘calculated black’.


5 posted on 10/14/2011 5:06:23 AM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

As long as there’s huge money to be made in the grievance industry, with the likes of Sharpton and Jackson, there never will be true equality.

Organizations like the NAACP, that once had a real purpose, have evolved into entities that now work to keep “their people” oppressed, dependent, and on the Democrat welfare plantation. And the more, the merrier.

It’s so sad to see black conservatives voted off the island when they should be held up as positive role models and examples of how far we’ve come as a nation.

But that messsge doesn’t fit the socialist agenda, so we’ll continue to see the non-stop attacks and smears from those who should be celebrating our progress in race relations.

So tell me. Exactly WHO has provided the “hope and change” we can believe in?


6 posted on 10/14/2011 5:07:50 AM PDT by Tigerized
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

These are landslides

This is not


7 posted on 10/14/2011 5:07:58 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; NFHale; ...
RE :”Could anyone have imagined even a few years ago that the 2012 U.S. presidential race might end up as a contest between two black candidates? I certainly couldn't have. Yet, with Republican candidate Herman Cain's recent surge in popularity, the possibility is there. This says a great deal about race in America — all of it good.
In many respects, Herman Cain's advance in the Republican primary contest is more striking than Barack Obama’s rise in 2008. Unlike Obama, whose father was African and who was raised largely in Hawaii by his white grandparents, Cain is a product of the segregated South.
Obama benefitted from affirmative action, attended Ivy League schools and taught law at one of America's most prestigious institutions, the University of Chicago. He lived and worked in a rarified world where being black (or in his case, being of mixed race) was — if a factor at all — an advantage.
Cain, on the other hand, was raised in the South by a father who worked three jobs — as a barber, a janitor and a chauffer — and a mother who was a cleaning woman. Cain grew up at a time when schools were still mostly segregated and attended Morehouse, a historically black college in Atlanta, where he earned a degree in mathematics.
After Cain earned his master's degree in computer science, he went to work in business. He started at Coca-Cola in Atlanta and then worked his way through a series of corporate jobs until he became CEO of Godfather's Pizza — a company which he took from the brink of bankruptcy to profitability in short order. His was a slow, steady climb up the economic ladder in an environment in which being black meant you had to prove yourself each and every day
”.

The above is the part of the article I like (author Linda Chavez is a RINO) . Seeing these two completely opposite black men (liberal and conservative, privileged and self-made, government and private sector, grew up in the affirmative action North vs segregated South) compete for the WH is the only really interesting and exciting possible scenario that I can see now.

10 posted on 10/14/2011 5:10:02 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Cain :"My parents didn't raise me to beg the government for other peoples money")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
This says a great deal about race in America -- all of it good.

Half of it good. Obama supporters only tolerate that druggie because he claims to be black (with only slightly more truth than his claim to be Christian or American). Cain supporters are indifferent to his skin color and have moved beyond caring about race.

12 posted on 10/14/2011 5:19:47 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“O” is a deformed, Anti-American miscreant who slithered out from under a rock somewhere....and who, given all this and with his ‘baggage’, WOULD NOT have been considered if he was a WHITE candidate.

Cain is the McCoy!!


13 posted on 10/14/2011 5:19:49 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Socialism means slavery." Lord Acton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Could anyone have imagined even a few years ago that the 2012 U.S. presidential race might end up as a contest between two black candidates?

Maybe it still won't happen if Zero drops out and Hillary is the 2012 Democrat-Socialist candidate, or the would-be dictator cancels elections and puts Republicans in jail.

18 posted on 10/14/2011 5:37:02 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Everyone should check out Cain’s church affiliations and compare it to Obummer’s church of hate.


19 posted on 10/14/2011 5:38:27 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Cain’s biggest gaffe was not saying he could do without a Muslim in his administration. His biggest gaffe was not coming up with a better answer about foreign policy in his first debate.

Saying that he’d just defer to the experts won’t cut it.

The right answer is that he has certain principles that he applies across the board: (1) American Security, (2) Integrity, (3) Support for allies, (4) etc.

Those kinds of things are general, but they are “Reaganesque” in that Reagan operated more on principle than on knowing the name of the under-secretary of defense in Pakistan. It’s better to know that he’ll crush the guy if he steps out of line.

Peace through Strength always is a winning principle.


29 posted on 10/14/2011 6:15:01 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson