Posted on 11/02/2011 9:04:01 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
Donald Trump urges Herman Cain to "bring a major lawsuit against those two women if what they assert is false."
(Excerpt) Read more at video.foxnews.com ...
Good interview with Greta Van Susteran. Not only on the Cain smear, but also good tactics to respond to such charges and then a sidebar discussion on the sorry state of the American Economy, current markets, China, unfair trade, buying the LA Dodgers, etc. etc.
Ping!
agree.
He’s a public figure. How does he prove actual malice?
They don’t take out Cain now before January, the Cain Train’ will be unstoppable. I guess this is the best that Rahm/Perry/Soros/ MSM have in mind.
I’ll take Cain over zero/romney but what do you expect from him? Reagan? I don’t see it. A little better than Bush won’t cut it. You’re all infatuated w him because he’s all we have left. IMHO.
true....but like I’ve told many of my lib friends...our pet hermit crab would be a better president than Obama.
Nah. I mean what choice do we have here? Bachmann isn;t making any noise and can’t win in the polls. Palin’s gone, so we all pinch our noses again like in 2008 when voting for RIno MCCain or see where the primaries lead. At this point alone, Perry’s gone and the lib media keeps pushing Mittney to our faces..
I’ve still got Newt in the on-deck circle.
Cain may not be Reagan, but he’s unsoiled by Washington. If Little Stevie Dunham can get in, Cain can get in and choose those around him to help him.
I didn’t think he had a chance by virtue of his skin color AFTER the obamanation. But, he’s not OF Washington which makes him MORE than palatable. Little Stevie is made of sh*t and is attempting to make America sh*t.
Romney loves himself. Obama loves Reggie Love. Manchelle loves food. Hillary loves that Moslem intern of hers. Perry loves illegals. Cain loves this country.
I’m not trying to be hard on Cain. My problem is that when the devil’s afterbirth is in our highest office the best we can come up with is Cain/Gingrich/Perry/Santorum/Bachmann/Paul/Huntsman. The people who should’ve been able to knock out zero, Ryan, Rubio, Demint, said no. That should tell you something. Something bad is happening.
(And I do miss Ruth)
interested = infatuated?
Who knew?
“A little better than Bush won’t cut it.”
Who is comparing? I’m not. I’m measuring the man by his reputation, experience, and ideas.
You’re exposing your bias.
What’s my bias? If Cain is your idea of the perfect Presidential candidate then the bias is yours. He is politically inexperienced. He’ll have to learn a lot on the job. Surrounding himself with a lot of experience will just result in a lot of power plays. He’s the most inexperienced in the field. I’ll take him over zero for sure but he’s a loose cannon, more than you will acknowledge.
To be perfectly honest, no one in their right minds would want to be President the next 4 years considering the decisions that’ll have to be made.
I don’t recall anyone claiming anything about a “perfect Presidential candidate” except you.
“He is politically inexperienced.” And Romney, Gingrich, Paul, and Perry are politically experienced.
“loose cannon”? “more than you will acknowledge.” You haven’t seen a loose cannon, have you? There’s nothing to acknowledge. You’re the only one who believes he’s a loose cannon; not those interested in Herman Cain’s platform and candidacy.
“To be perfectly honest, no one in their right minds would want to be President the next 4 years considering the decisions that’ll have to be made.”
I am relieved to know that you’re the only individual who believes this.
Your bias is that you don’t support Herman Cain. And you’ll resort to illogical reasoning in an attempt to substantiate a point.
Your an idiot.
I wonder if The Donald will support Cain by providing him with a kick-ass opposition research team.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.