Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cain chief-of-staff walks back Perry accusations
The Hill ^ | 11/3/2011 01:34 PM ET | Justin Sink

Posted on 11/03/2011 11:04:33 AM PDT by RoosterRedux

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
To: MNJohnnie

Ah, I get it. It’s Rove, not the Cain campaign, behind the Perry accusation. Oh please.


21 posted on 11/03/2011 11:21:11 AM PDT by MizSterious (Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Has the Perry camp addressed the behavior of their Pollster Chris Wilson and Perry’s Arizona State coordinator yet?

I've been watching for that, but haven't spotted anything yet.

22 posted on 11/03/2011 11:21:44 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shield

Yep, much better to be handled by a group of people who let a good speech get morphed into a drunken sideshow.


23 posted on 11/03/2011 11:21:57 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( The Prudential Governor... Have you bought your piece of the Rick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

BS. Even if he publicly said that they could release his name doesn’t mean he didn’t leak it. Reporters may still want to protect their source because if they go this route then everyone starts saying “Release my name if I leaked”. The one not agreeing to that is then outed.

However, if he was the leak and wanted his name known he’d just say I did it. By saying I didn’t leak it then saying the politico can say if I did is a clue that he doesn’t want to be outed.


24 posted on 11/03/2011 11:23:21 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Still say it was Romney. Obengruppenfuhrer Rahm Ernst might have prodded Perry’s camp with the info, but it sides up best viz Occam’s Razor with Romney and his deep, deep NRA connections.


25 posted on 11/03/2011 11:25:27 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Do you have PROOF of your as yet unfounded allegation? Or do you just like to randomly smear candidates you don’t support?


26 posted on 11/03/2011 11:25:36 AM PDT by MizSterious (Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

That statement was about China’s aircraft carriers.


27 posted on 11/03/2011 11:26:06 AM PDT by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
common decency on FR isn’t really all that common these days.

You can say that again. This forum used to have intelligent conversation. Now if you aren't in lockstep with a given poster's candidate you are vilified. And candidates who are running against a given poster's favorite are smeared with the ugliest of character assassination. I find myself on here less and less these days. It's grown too contentious for me.

28 posted on 11/03/2011 11:26:10 AM PDT by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

LOL, I have a great marketing idea!

The Cain camp should develop their own version of the game “CLUE” and sell them to raise money.

Suspects Would be:
Mitt Romney
Rick Perry
Barack Obama
Rahm Emmanuel
Michele Bachmann
Ron Paul
Newt Gingrich
Hillary Clinton

Locations:
Alexandria, VA
Chicago, AK
Atlanta, GA
Oklahoma City, OK
Denver, CO
Austin, TX
New York, NY
Seattle, WA

Weapons:
Butcher Knife
Rope
Whip
Revolver
Lead Pipe
Wrench
Hammer
Gold Brick


29 posted on 11/03/2011 11:27:08 AM PDT by parksstp (Articulate Conservatives look for Converts. RINO's look for Democrat Heretics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Good for him. Being the adult in the room AGAIN. Doesn’t mean he didn’t do it, the truth will prevail. If Anderson and Wilson were involved, we’ll know soon enough.

Now it’s time for Perry, Bachmann and Santorum camp to man up and the “accept” Cain’s statement of innocence on the sexual harassment issue, stance on abortion and the MANY other issues they have misrepresented him on.


30 posted on 11/03/2011 11:30:17 AM PDT by justsaynomore (Pray for Herman Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

I agree. After this mishandling, Block needs to be demoted and definitely not put in front of a live camera or mike.


31 posted on 11/03/2011 11:31:03 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: McLynnan

Last election, people actually talked about their candidates (pro or con) without all the name calling—except in the Smoky Backroom. This election, I’m hesitant to recommend FR to my friends. Just too much of a food fight, and not a lot of intelligent back and forth. I miss the FR that got to the bottom of Dan Rather’s “documents” and other finer moments.


32 posted on 11/03/2011 11:31:07 AM PDT by MizSterious (Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Everybody knows Rahm and the Obama mob machine did it and would love the GOP and tea party fighting; divided they conquer.

33 posted on 11/03/2011 11:31:57 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Totally agree! Said this last night when I saw him on Fox. He’s not good.


34 posted on 11/03/2011 11:32:08 AM PDT by txmissy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The Cain campaign is looking like amateur hour.


35 posted on 11/03/2011 11:32:14 AM PDT by teddyballgame1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

If you had listned to what Mr. Cain actually said during his interview relative PRC nuclear weapons, he said they were developing nuclear capability, meaning expanding their nuclear delivery sytems and mix of nuclear weapons. And.....Cain has handled this rather well for an accused person whose accusers refuse to identify themselves and accuse him directly. Simple, Ms. accusers, give us your name, rank & serial number, and then you are free to blab. Methinks, you have been drinking the Kool-Aid of Barack Hussein Obama & Karl Rove!!! And....you have swallowed the tales of the mainstream media without question. Sad!!!


36 posted on 11/03/2011 11:34:09 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX ( ed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

You missed the actual culprit — Karl Rove.


37 posted on 11/03/2011 11:35:35 AM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
"Until we get all the facts, I'm just going to say that we accept what Mr. Anderson has said, and we want to move on with the campaign," Block said on Fox News.

Then less than a minute later he said they stand by Cain's remarks from yesterday. Megan Kelly pointed out that yesterday Cain accused Anderson by name, so do you stand by that or not? Block tried to dismiss his contradition with the Cain standby "We're moving on". Probably just wanted to get out of there and have a smoke.

38 posted on 11/03/2011 11:36:48 AM PDT by Hugin ("Most time a man'll tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear"--Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
That's what I think. This has Alinsky, Rahm, and Obama written all over it.

Can't wait for the truth to emerge.

39 posted on 11/03/2011 11:41:47 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Do you know what I think is really dishonorable? That neither the Perry nor the Romney campaigns came out against the vagueness of the Politico charges against Cain. It is this type of “gotcha” journalism that keeps decent people out of politics. And neither the Romney camp nor the Perry camp has spoken out against sullying reputations nor the feeding frenzy of this type of story. Why haven’t they said, let’s get beck to the issues? They seem culpable because of their lack of spine in this matter to me. They seem to be enjoying their “fellow” Republican get accused of vague charges. Perry and Romney seem to have forgotten that we are fighting a bigger fight than amongst each other.


40 posted on 11/03/2011 11:42:32 AM PDT by madinmadtown (Marx, the patron saint of blame, envy and destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson