Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyer for Cain’s accuser: On second thought, she’d rather not relive this publicly (VAPORS!)
Hotair ^ | 11/04/2011 | Allahpundit

Posted on 11/04/2011 2:34:10 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

No video yet, but it sure sounds like that’s the end of that. For now.

Who knew the big finale would end Sopranos-style?

Bennett said his client sees “no value” in revisiting the issue now, but “stands by the complaint that she made.”

Bennett said his client would disagree with Cain’s characterization of the alleged harassment incidents.

He confirmed that the alleged harassment occurred in 1999 over a period of “at least a month or two.” There was “more than one incident,” he said.

And here’s the key part of the statement from the NRA:

“Based upon the information currently available, we can confirm that more than a decade ago, in July 1999, Mr. Bennett’s client filed a formal internal complaint, in accordance with the Association’s existing policies prohibiting discrimination and harassment. Mr. Herman Cain disputed the allegations in the complaint. The Association and Mr. Bennett’s client subsequently entered into an agreement to resolve the matter, without any admission of liability. Mr. Cain was not a party to that agreement. The agreement contains mutual confidentiality obligations. Notwithstanding the Association’s ongoing policy of maintaining the privacy of all personnel matters, we have advised Mr. Bennett that we are willing to waive the confidentiality of this matter and permit Mr. Bennett’s client to comment. As indicated in Mr. Bennett’s statement, his client prefers not to be further involved with this matter and we will respect her decision.

Does that waiver apply only to today’s statement or is it a general waiver that would allow her to speak if she changes her mind down the road? Because if he’s the nominee, the left will be keenly interested in hearing from her, especially now that the promise of multiple incidents has been dangled in front of them. And the worse the economy looks, the keener that interest will be. There is, or was, potential for this to hurt him among GOP primary voters too, but unless something more specific than gossip like this drops, that potential’s gone now. WaPo’s new poll, conducted after the Politico story broke, finds him still neck and neck with Romney, with 70 percent saying the allegations won’t matter to their vote. There’s room for that to change — 37 percent of Republicans polled called the charges a “serious matter” — but it’s 4:45 p.m. ET on Friday as I write this and, after a full week of accusations, we still have yet to hear a single credible detailed account of what happened between him and the accusers. Hard to believe anyone’s vote is changing based on that.

Here’s CBS’s report on the settlement agreement that was signed between the NRA and one of the accusers in September 1999 (yes, 9/99). Cain himself didn’t sign, and had actually left the NRA in June of that year; it’s unclear if the woman filed the complaint before or after he departed. CBS points to that as evidence that Cain really might not have known about the settlement, as he first asserted earlier this week. Could be, but he did find out about the underlying accusations at some point: Remember, he told Richard Miniter that he mentioned them to Curt Anderson back in 2003 when he was a Senate candidate. Ah well. Maybe the timeline will be clarified in one of Politico’s next 90 stories about this.

Update: Jim Geraghty summarizes the argument from the accuser’s lawyer thusly: “I won’t say what he did, but trust me, he’s guilty of wrongdoing.”

Update: Interesting question from Nate Silver. Cain’s numbers probably won’t shrink because of this, but will the way the campaign handled things create a ceiling on his support?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hermancain; martinfails; obamafails; romneyfails; rovefails; sexualharassment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: MNJohnnie

i thought if this occurred during clinton years,
it didn’t count. it’s just about sex,
everyone does it, it’s between a man and his wife,
the politics of personal destruction, yada, yada, yada.


41 posted on 11/04/2011 3:28:38 PM PDT by gussiefinknottle (woof!woof!woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: normy
We got the living snot beat out of us.

Forgive me if I appear contentious but that defeat was a function of nominating a RINO. From my perspective you just made the case against your boy.

42 posted on 11/04/2011 3:29:33 PM PDT by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: normy

Sorry Normy but your attempt to pimp a dead smear for Perry is getting patheitic now


43 posted on 11/04/2011 3:33:29 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Put out up or shut up!

She shut up.

How $$ did Atty Bennett get for this charade?

44 posted on 11/04/2011 3:33:45 PM PDT by Rudder (The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever
We now know all the facts about this non-story.

I'm not sure she ever existed.

45 posted on 11/04/2011 3:39:06 PM PDT by Rudder (The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Oh, Johnnie, you know better than that! They never stop. They never bother to get a different playbook. They are contemptuous of us, full of themselves and confident the DBM has their back.

They are zombies. They will be back.


46 posted on 11/04/2011 3:39:54 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

Who are we up against, the Terminator?


47 posted on 11/04/2011 3:46:47 PM PDT by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
"Lawyer for Cain’s accuser: On second thought, she’d rather not relive this publicly (VAPORS!)"

This 'scandal' just came out during Cain's run for the presidency - so what publicity, exactly would she have to relive?

48 posted on 11/04/2011 3:48:16 PM PDT by LADY J ( Change your thoughts and you change your world.. - Norman Vincent Peale))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: normy

You could be right. Obama could be buying their silence now and they screeching later. The only problem is, they most likely have nothing to screech about.


49 posted on 11/04/2011 3:56:12 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

It is turning out well for Herman.

Now I’d like to see him hire a new campaign manager and move this whole thing up to the next level.

On to victory next November.


50 posted on 11/04/2011 3:57:14 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: normy

Makes no sense. Cain won’t be the nominee.


51 posted on 11/04/2011 4:04:35 PM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Looking For Donors


Click The Pic

Are You One?

52 posted on 11/04/2011 4:09:32 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
"Actually, she may not have started this. Someone else likely orchestrated the whole thing, dragged her into it, they proceeded and she bailed on them seeing the public response. Obama? Romney? Perry?...hmmmmm....

I've heard rumors that Politico released all this information without any consent from the women involved. Wherever they got the story - they released it on their own with no permission from anyone.

Did anyone else hear this?

53 posted on 11/04/2011 4:11:48 PM PDT by LADY J ( Change your thoughts and you change your world.. - Norman Vincent Peale))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stormhill

More like Skynet.


54 posted on 11/04/2011 4:26:01 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This Cain “scandal” is now officially boring.


55 posted on 11/04/2011 4:29:55 PM PDT by 6SJ7 (I'm an AmeriCain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

OMG...this guy hangs with Podesta?? The only person that is sleazier than him is Bill Clinton.


56 posted on 11/04/2011 4:57:39 PM PDT by radioone ("2012 can't come soon enough")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When someone is trying to win a hand without showing their cards, that is commonly called bluffing. These ladies are being encouraged or paid to bluff. It didn’t work.
Go to plan “B”.


57 posted on 11/04/2011 5:12:41 PM PDT by Doulos1 (Bitter Clinger Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
There are now no barriers to her talking but she won't. She won't even get specific, through her lawyer. What are the American people supposed to do with this? Is she just waiting to see if Cain's the nominee?

Well, that's ONE accuser, what about the second?

Top of the hour, I noticed ABCNews is reporting the story as breathlessly and salaciously as possible, as if details of the multiple sexual harassment claims are known or even that her identity is known.

58 posted on 11/04/2011 5:16:39 PM PDT by newzjunkey (TeaParty & establishment GOP conspire to reelect Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LADY J
Did anyone else hear this?

No, but for the right price I'd be willing to swear to it, anonymously, through my lawyer.

59 posted on 11/04/2011 5:23:29 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: kevao
"Did anyone else hear this?

No, but for the right price I'd be willing to swear to it, anonymously, through my lawyer."

Hey - you're my kind of guy!!! Lots of moxy!!! LOL

60 posted on 11/04/2011 6:03:52 PM PDT by LADY J ( Change your thoughts and you change your world.. - Norman Vincent Peale))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson