Boston Globe reporter withholds 0bama file birth (narrative doesn't match up with INS reports)
. . . . # 18 , then # 21 .
.
Posted on 11/09/2011 7:09:04 AM PST by tutstar
A Boston Globe reporter sympathetic to Barack Obama apparently received favored access to the immigration file of the president's father.
In writing her biography of Barack Obama's father, Boston Globe reporter Sally H. Jacobs had access to what appears to be the father's unredacted Immigration and Naturalization Service file. The documents cover the time Barack Obama Sr. arrived in Honolulu in 1959 until he was forced to leave the United States in 1964.
However, the redacted file the Department of Homeland Security provided in an Freedom of Information Act request to independent reporter Heather Smathers whited-out key facts about the president's birth narrative, judging from the one unredacted page WND has obtained.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Really?
To my knowledge (and personal experience with CIA recruiting) the CIA would never have embraced a Red-Diaper Baby bigamously married to a radical socialist. She was much more likely to be a KGB asset than a CIA agent.
Her undergraduate degree was in mathematics, so she could easily comprehend the rudimentary accounting skills needed to be involved in micro-loan programs to women in third-world countries. That and her comfort in living in Muslim countries and her anthropological skills made her a perfect fit for the progressive programs of the Ford Foundation.
Boston Globe reporter withholds 0bama file birth (narrative doesn't match up with INS reports)
. . . . # 18 , then # 21 .
.
More telling, perhaps, might be a journalism student presented with two sets of facts for stories, containing similar evidence, crimes, but different perpetrators/victims, and see what differences were present in the way they addressed the events, evidence, and underlying issues.
Dunham’s associaion with the insidious Ford Foundation is nothing to sneeze at.
From wikipedia:
“In 2010, the foundation granted $16.4 million (USD) to foundations throughout the world that advocate legalization of abortion or provide abortion services, including Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and International Planned Parenthood Foundation. In 2010, Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America was elected to Ford Foundation’s board of trustees.
The foundation’s partnership with the New Israel Fund, which began in 2003, was frequently criticised regarding its choice of mostly liberal grantees and causes. This criticism came to light after the 2001 Durban Conference, where some NGOs funded by the foundation backed resolutions equating Israeli policies as apartheid, and later, against those groups which support the delegitimization of Israel. In response, the foundation adopted stricter criteria for funding.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Foundation
We all know what kind of monsters Planned Parenthood are, but who or what is the New Israel Fund ?
Also from wikipedia:
“The New Israel Fund was established in 1979 and has seed-funded most progressive social change groups in Israel. Since its inception the fund has provided over US $200 million to more than 800 organizations. NIF was the first major Jewish organization to work extensively with Arab citizens of Israel.”
Ok. No big deal, but.....
“In September 2011, the contents of a United States diplomatic telegram were revealed via Wikileaks, stating that Hedva Radovanitz, then Assistant Director of NIF Israel, said “she believed that in 100 years Israel would be majority Arab and that the disappearance of a Jewish state would not be the tragedy that Israelis fear since it would become more ‘democratic.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Israel_Fund
Yes, these things came after Stanley Ann Dunham’s death, but I wanted to illustrate how dangerous the Ford Foundation is, and I wanted to illustrate what a radical Dunham had to be in order to be associated with it. Scary stuff when you consider her son (I guess, well, I don’t know) is the sitting President of the United States.
I agree, but I strongly believe this type of testing is necessary. Higher education has become incredibly expensive, but there is no standard analysis of the final ‘product’. ‘Name’ schools purport to be ‘the best’, but never have to prove anything head to head. There's no question that a highly motivated person with ability can perform as well or better educating themselves with alternative resources than students in traditional venues. They deserve to be able to prove it in an irrefutable way. It's the most egalitarian, affordable, and non-elitist approach possible.
For the sciences, math, engineering etc. keeping bias out of the tests would not be as difficult as in social sciences, journalism etc., but even for the later it could be done. It would be necessary to have an independent testing agency that was monitored for content and wasn't controlled by university faculty. In many instances questions could be submitted by people actually working in the particular fields being tested.
Wouldn't be perfect, but it could be a game changer.
So what seems to be the case is that Mama Obama got herself knocked with some black guy’s baby and needed a cover. This black guy figures he can get citizenship by marrying her. Didn’t work though because he couldn’t keep it in his pants to even pretend to be married.
Sheesh.
To a point.
FOr example, the tests would have to be carefully vetted--and which experts would do so?
Issues which creep into the sciences:
Anthropogenic Global Warming,
Effects of Atmospheric CO2 levels,
the composition of diet vs. health and "wellness",
the correlation between abortion and breast cancer, vaccine risks (autism, allergies produced by squalene exposure, thimoserol) vs. benefits,
Joe McCarthy (saint or demon?),
History of Western Civilization in general, but especially the last century,
and it gets worse with the 'fuzzy' sciences (psychology, sociology, anthropology, etc.)
So much of what is taught in universities today is polluted by the Liberal agendae, whether those are State Universities or IV League, that it would be difficult to come up with tests which would survive (corrupted) peer review and not reflect the Liberal/Marxist bias present in what we call higher education.
While I agree in principle that standardized testing might be good for fundamentals, when you get to the level of even the GRE in specific subject areas, the potential for bias could negate the purpose of indicating the quality of the student and instead only measure the level of indoctrination.
Moochelle let the cat out of the bag when she said SADO was very young and very single.
Back on the long thread (?) there is a discussion of SADO's Seattle college apartment being next to the Salvation Army.
Who doesn't believe the INS file hasn't been fixed like his passport, school records, BC, etc.?
“While I agree in principle that standardized testing might be good for fundamentals, when you get to the level of even the GRE in specific subject areas, the potential for bias could negate the purpose of indicating the quality of the student and instead only measure the level of indoctrination.”
As it stands now we have no control at all. At least in that context you would have a standardized record of bias that could be challenged. I have taken lots of board exams, which are essentially the same categorically as what we’ve been discussing. They’re not perfect, but they do demonstrate that you have or don’t have a basic operative level of competence. Incidentally, in these kinds of exams it’s not the Ivies etc. that necessarily do the best.
Their East West friends posted remembrances of Sr. that they never knew about a baby.
All those times from college and on that he spent in Pakistan is yet another reason he hid out on the golf course before the OBL raid and why he wrote Pakistan a hefty check afterward. The enemy within.
So, unfortunately, he's probably a NBC, but he has lied and schemed his way through life.
Looks like reporters in Pennsylvania did a similar 'withholding' of information. How charming.
Speaking of sloppy writing (not yours), I sure hope we are talking about an "improbable love" between a girl from Kansas and a GOATHERDER (instead of a goatherd) from Kenya. Good grief.
Good catch. Actually that would explain things. Obama is half-American and Half-Kenyan Goat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.