The AP is also falsely claiming a 5th woman has accused Cain of sexual harassment.
Being “suspicious of Cain’s motives” in why he wanted to set up a dinner is now harassment?
Joel Bennett slipped up and referred to #2 as "Sharon from Chicago" at some point. When asked, Bialek wouldn't deny contacting Bennett, and her attorney Allred quickly changed the subject.
Well there you go. She's a 2/5ths accuser...
Having dinner I think would be normal for people in the RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION. It doesn’t necessarily mean he was trying to seduce her.
Is Perry still behind all this?
By Jove, I think he's got it!
So let me get this straight, inviting someone to dinner is harassment, but exposing your malformed genitalia to a subordinate is not?
This thing has smelled so coordinated, like it was all ran thru lawyers and strategists to spread the sleeze but not be able to really refute it. At the core there is no ‘there there’. It’s all shadow games.
Two of them won’t give their names or say what he did, one works for the Zero administration and also won’t say what he did, but claims she might and possibly in a joint presser with the other two. Tease and hint, but no presser forthcoming as of yet.
The fourth told the story in such a way as to make sure no one else could possibly confirm or deny. Fortunately she is completely uncredible and it still fell apart.
It’s all too scripted. I think they were hoping it would take off like wildfire and Cain be done before it was refuted.
Welcome to the Internet Age stupid MSM.
Did any of you hear that Obama hack talking to Jenna Lee about Iran a few minutes ago?
He sounds like Elmer Fudd?
He said Iran kind of has a Cain problem, stuff in their past...blah, blah... that takes away credibility...blah
No one on FOX ever stops a person like that and says, why did you bring Cain into this discussion, rather odd..
They are mounting an all out attack on Cain today.
Does that matter to the MSM? Of course not. Their only desire is to continue the slow, steady drip of stories with suggestions based on someone's feelings or suppostions, none of which have any evidence behind them. They don't ask questions of any of the accusers, they simply report what they're told. Their intention isn't to completely destroy Herman Cain. They only want to bleed off enough supporters to affect a reduction in his standing in the race for the Republican nomination.
His standing in the polls will only be reduced if folks who had initially supported him fall for the breathless reportage of the MSM, and take these stories at face value without ANY evidence to support them.
This confirms there are only THREE complainants:
Bialek - NRA Chicago employee fired - claim of meeting HC in Washington DC. Atty Gloria Allred
Kraushaar - NRA employee severance payment - employed by INS - now with Treasury Dept. Atty Joel Bennett
Anonymous - NRA employee severance payment - no more details.
There are only TWO accusers...TWO!
any reference to more than TWO is PURE UNPROVEN RUMOR AT THIS MOMENT!
stuck them with the bill for 2 - 400$ bottles of wine? Ummmmhummmmm.... yeah right. PROVE IT.
I think truth is that some women are so conceited and so insecure that they just assume EVERY man is after them. So, anything he says, any gesture is exaggerated in order to enhance these women’s “reputation” for being a “blonde bombshell” or other self-glorifying story or the other that they fancy themselves. Fact is, they generally aren’t as much “all that” as they fancy themselves. (Hence, their proclivity for following a powerful man around in hopes they’ll benefit financially. When they don’t, hell hath no fury like . . well, you know.)
In this situation, Cain should have had a male friend tag along.
I’m not even sure there is a 4th accuser.
You expect yellow hacks to write lies and add, too?
The scribes and Pharisees had better back off.
There is no 4th or 3rd accuser either. All we have so far is two names, one direct accusation, and zero dates.