Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Carolina Immigration Law Challenged by 16 Nations
Fox News ^ | November 9, 2011 | na

Posted on 11/09/2011 2:52:20 PM PST by upchuck

Citing concerns for their citizens, sixteen nations from Latin America and the Caribbean have asked to join in the U.S. Justice Department's lawsuit against South Carolina's controversial law that aims to curb the number of undocumented immigrants in the state.

Mexico, Honduras, Brazil, Ecuador, Chile and other countries filed papers Tuesday, asking to join the Justice Department's litigation in Charleston.

The law would require law officers who make a traffic stop to call federal immigration officials if they suspect someone is in the country illegally. Opponents say the measure would encourage racial profiling.

The 16 nations state in their filings that the law would lead to state-sanctioned discrimination against their citizens.

Justice Department lawyers are asking the court to stop the law from taking effect in January, saying immigration policy is solely the domain of the U.S. government.

This is not the first time that government's of Latin America have raised concerns about the immigration polices in certain U.S. states. In June of last year Mexico asked a U.S. federal court to declare Arizona's immigration law unconstitutional, arguing that the country's own interests and its citizens' rights were at stake.

(Excerpt) Read more at latino.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Bring it!
1 posted on 11/09/2011 2:52:21 PM PST by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upchuck

ONE World Government....now you see where it is going? Discrimination is a world wide “opportunity” to steal our assets/money/rights/etc


2 posted on 11/09/2011 2:54:18 PM PST by goodnesswins (My Kid/Grandkids are NOT your ATM, liberals! (Sarah Palin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: l8pilot; 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; A Strict Constructionist; ...
South Carolina
Ping

Send FReepmail to join or leave this list.

3 posted on 11/09/2011 2:54:18 PM PST by upchuck (Rerun: Think you know hardship? Wait till the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
The 16 nations state in their filings that the law would lead to state-sanctioned discrimination against their citizens.

If "their citizens" are in this country illegally then it is pretty much "I don't give a s**t."

File away hammerheads. Pizz off American Citizens yet again, the election is only a year away...

.

4 posted on 11/09/2011 2:57:08 PM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Why would these country’s want their citizens to be criminals?
The question South Carolina needs to present to the Court is do any of the countrys wanting in on the suit allow people from other nations to enter their country illegal??


5 posted on 11/09/2011 2:57:28 PM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

ALL their Claims and Filings should be dismissed for lack of “Standing”. U.S. Citizens only, period.


6 posted on 11/09/2011 2:58:17 PM PST by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

No, they don’t need to bring it - they can SUCK IT!


7 posted on 11/09/2011 2:58:21 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
"No, they don’t need to bring it - they can SUCK IT! "

Yeah; well said!

8 posted on 11/09/2011 2:59:02 PM PST by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
The 16 nations state in their filings that the law would lead to state-sanctioned discrimination against their citizens. Key word is..............THEIR citizens. Take them back if you are so concerned about YOUR citizens. Sheesh!
9 posted on 11/09/2011 2:59:54 PM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I volunteer to speak for the American people to tell these 16 nations to F*** themselves.


10 posted on 11/09/2011 3:00:39 PM PST by max americana (CAIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Wow!!! If we had a real president and attorney general of THIS country, the crowd from Latin America would never consider such a thing. Holder will judge shop to find one who will not only agree with him, but won’t summarily throw the suit out.


11 posted on 11/09/2011 3:01:32 PM PST by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

This must be a joke? If you are caught without legal papers in Mexico, you are promptly put in Mexican jail and then deported asap.


12 posted on 11/09/2011 3:01:37 PM PST by federal__reserve (Dr. Paul Volcker, the best Chairman of federal Reserve in half a century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

The fact that a bunch of foreign S.O.B.s don’t like our laws doesn’t bother me in the least. What pisses me off is the filthy, stinking, traitorous federal effing govt attacking us and using the foreigners as allies against us. I despise the federal govt. DESPISE them!


13 posted on 11/09/2011 3:01:51 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

Yeah its time to flush Congress, the bowl is full.


14 posted on 11/09/2011 3:04:21 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

It would be nice if every state sues the hell out of these countries for all the money their people are stealing from taxpayers. They can give us the money their illegals send them every year which totals billions. Not to mention nailing Mexico for human rights abuses which causes its citizens to flock to this country.


15 posted on 11/09/2011 3:05:41 PM PST by mardi59 (Time to turn off the tv so I don't break it..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

It is astonishing to me, and sickening, that our government will side with other nations against one of the states. If the red states don’t secede, it’s all over. And it better happen while it can be pulled off. If it can be pulled off.


16 posted on 11/09/2011 3:06:01 PM PST by Terry Mross (Where is the OPPOSITION party? I'll only vote for a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

I couldn’t say it any better! Since when did other countries have any say so in our laws! This just boils my panties.


17 posted on 11/09/2011 3:06:41 PM PST by humble and shy (Taking our country back, one corrupt politician at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

I consider one world government as more of the purview of the global multi-national corporatists than liberals per se. In fact of matter the globalists pit liberals and conservatives against each other, while they pilfer the taxpayer and treasury.

There are many conservatives that are still naively on the side of the globalists thinking that commercial interests are in their interests. Wrong! USA commercial interests are their interests, but not the multi-nationals who view country sovereignty whether it be the USA or any other as a big problem. Most big business is now multi-national. They want one world government, one set of regulations, and open borders and all at the expense of the rights of individual nations.

In a nutshell this is what is wrong with the so-called “conservative” Citizens United decision that allows multi-national corporations to influence the election of our Congress and President. When a corporation decides to go multi-national, they should lose the right to lobby and influence our elections.


18 posted on 11/09/2011 3:07:35 PM PST by apoliticalone (Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
These a holes outside the US dont count go scratch. This is an effort to support the legitimacy of an international court and ham hocks hillary.
19 posted on 11/09/2011 3:07:39 PM PST by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Anyone want to guess what Rick “Open-Borders” Perry’s position on this law is?


20 posted on 11/09/2011 3:07:39 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson