 |
I was speculating before about her possibly working for Brad Brewster, but this article virtually confirms it.
And she doesn't want to come out right now? And I'm pretty sure I know why. Larry Forth, the guy I believe she worked for, left in April 1998 and she wanted that promotion, but was denied it due to what was describes as "poor job performance".
You can see it again here if you haven't already.
http://teapartypost.blogspot.com/
|
|
Good thing Cain’s team made sure to blame Perry for it.
The Fourth Estate could at least pretend to be a legitimate profession.
Great work. That was great thinking about the resume. Thanks for the effort!
Good catch!
this lady won’t come out of the woodwork unless or until Cain has the nomination, then team Obama - assuming the cretin hasn’t resigned or bowed out of the election by then, will force her out into the open.
So exactly how does this exonerate Cain? It doesn’t.
Wow!
Pressure these women and they will cave because I do not believe them. The communists Democrats will do anything.
If I am reading it right, it is as follows:
in 1998 a woman accused Cain of inviting her to his hotel room after an association event. She got $35,000.00 and agreed to leave. Then...the second one to accuse, Kraushaar, left about a year later (1999-ish) and got $45,000.00.
This seems so odd to me that such an intelligent man, circa the time of the Lewinsky stuff and hyper attention to women making accusations, and even after ONE settlement for some accusation, whatever it was, would then do a SECOND thing that would be actionable. He would have to be oblivious to do these behaviors with women that shared the work environment. It just somehow doesn’t make sense.
More likely seems that women at that particular time were both hypersensitive to being “offended” or “wronged” because the general awareness was so high, and/or they saw that there was money to be made. Otherwise I don’t see how a man so obtuse to the social milieu would have been able to advance to the positions he was in.
have you not also read about the possible Chicago Axelrod connection?
Her family, including a brother who is a lawyer and lists employment cases among his specialties, has declined interview requests.
But that's for someone else to follow up on.
As for Cain, he may indeed have been "trolling the water" back then. If he was "stepping out" it was a pretty stupid thing to do given his position. Middle-aged men do stupid things especially if drinking is involved - many of us have been there, have learned and are the wiser for it. Asking someone up to a hotel room should be obvious enough to the woman. Her saying no should be the end of it for both of them. But if there are allegations of her not receiving a promotion because she refused him, it could serve as a basis for a sexual harassment charge.
Just like the blog poster, this is all speculation. But the fact AP knows her identity and chooses to respect her privacy now does not mean her name will not be given to Politico or some other DC blog or even the Obama campaign to use against Cain if he recovers his poling numbers. In fact, I would bet they already know who she is.
Funny how all roads lead back to Mitt and Perry. I knew something was being staged during that debate when they had words over illegal hirings. Something didn’t sit right and their acting wouldn’t have gotten an Emmy. You can’t tell me that wasn’t planned to make the sheeple think they were enemies and would never work together. That was immediately before the accusations against Cain hit the wires.
Because she doesn't want to get sued for Defamation. Got Wood?
bfl