Posted on 11/24/2011 12:16:51 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
Washington, United States
The Republican candidates differ on their ideologies in various foreign policy issues in the second Republican presidential debate.
Newt Gingrich, who more recently has emerged to the top of the race for the Republican presidential nomination, said that during his government did not expel immigrants without legal permission but already have a life founded in the United States.
The applicant added that the Republicans can not say that his party is in favor of the family when separating parents from their children who were born in the country and have citizenship.
Gingrich, also supported the antiterrorism law known as the Patriot Act, passed after the attacks of September 11, 2001, which has been criticized by civil rights advocates.
In contrast, Congressman Ron Paul said that the law "is not patriotic because it undermines our freedoms."
Paul holds libertarian stances advocating cuts in aid to Israel, the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and the decriminalization of drugs.
The Congress is supported by a solid core of people who support him and admire his position of opposition to the current foreign policies. Either way, Ron Paul has not been able to be among the first places in the race for the nomination.
Since the candidate Romney, former governor of Massachusetts, opposed the cuts and suggested that the money is withdrawn the militia could be used to fund public health programs of Obama, which are repudiated by the Republicans.
Also, the wide range of issues gave room for many errors, especially because most applicants do not have considerable experience in international affairs.
Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, Governor Rick Perry of Texas and businessman Herman Cain so far have supported a role not so popular in today's candidacy.
Through the debate, the chances of Cain and were damaged with an incoherent response to a question from an interviewer about Libya. Perry, equally, to damage his campaign can not remember the names of the three federal agencies that wanted to eliminate.
This was the second debate, in less than two weeks, on foreign policy in a campaign dominated by internal affairs.
I refuse to spend time on FR posting a single article bashing a single GOP candidate. Do I have gripes about some, absolutely, there is one that detest, and one that I detest but he’s not even a player and one that I think is crazy but I love how he goes after the Federal Reserve. I could vote for any one of the others and have a clear conscience that I voted for a conservative. Are any of them perfect? No. Does a perfect candidate exist? Perhaps. If you are a Marxist then Barry Hussein Soetoro might be a perfect candidate. So the alternatives are the radical Muslim loving Marxist homo community organizer or one of the GOP candidates. Those are the options.
Just imagine what Hussein will do in a second term when re-election isn’t an issue( at least we HOPE it isn’t). Anyone that thinks the first 3 years were bad, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet. Mark my words.
Illegals are infringing on our rights as American Citizens. They don’t assimilate into America, in fact they want to change the way we live. They live in enclaves, many who have been here 10-25 years don’t speak English, the majority are on some type of government entitlement, they manufacture SS cards, drivers license and represent the greatest percentage of arrests in any given week in our community. Under any amnesty plan they will cost the taxpayer billions of dollars more and they are set in their ways that they will not change. They have no real skills or desires to improve our Country. Most illegals see themselves as Mexicans who just happen to be lucky enough to live in the USA with all it’s benefits.
_______________________________________________
Exactly!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.