Posted on 11/24/2011 7:46:28 PM PST by Fred
Newt Gingrich's Death Wish; Another RINO & Bleeding Heart GOP Liberal-Pro-Illegal Immigration's Republican Who’s Going Down in Flames of Infamy: Do you all want to know why unpopular President Obama is lockstep with GOP/Republicans candidates for the 2012 presidential elections? They can't distinguish themselves apart from Obama illegal immigration policies.
It’s because of the likes of Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich’s and other GOP RINO’s, those who are running in the Republican ticket instead of REAL conservative Americans, those who are for the American citizenries, instead of being beholden to special interest groups.
The GOP/Republicans are missing the BOAT on illegal immigration.
And finally the REAL Gingrich uncovered! Newt Gingrich is just another RINO, (Republican in Name Only), disguised as a conservative, who likes to REWARD illegal border crosser lawbreakers, with legalized documents and papers and who is going down in flames of 2012 infamy!
First there were the Rick Perry idiocies and now Newt Gingrich? I don’t know what it is with front runners in the Republican Party this year; they are shooting themselves in the foot, and are clearly laden with total ignorance and idiocies towards their views on illegal immigration.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
I am supporting Santorum/Cain/Gingrich/Perry/Bachmann, and if it comes to Paul versus Romney, then Paul.
I am a conserverative voter, and I’ll support a conservative.
The jackass conservatives either covertly or accidentally support Romney as their push their stupid attacks....and it always seem they say they “just love” all the candidates not currently in the lead.
I have supported each and every conservative who was in the lead to unseat Romney. But then his agents and or stooges (or Obama’s?) bring out the long knives and cut them down.
No one is good enough for the jackass conservatives (donkey-cross).
Romney is gaining in Iowa. He leads in New Hampshire. He’s gaining in South Carolina.
That’s because the jackass conservatives keep knifing each and every conservative who hits the lead.
But, I’ve caught on to the plan over the last 2 weeks, and I’m no longer buying in.
Iowa is 6 weeks away. If Romney is first or second in Iowa, then the race is over. He’ll then take New Hampshire, the media will crown him, the cross-over democrats will put him at the top, as will California and New York.
Wake up and quit knifing conservatives.
I like Newt and he’s just about convinced me to vote for him.
I was here at the time. JimRob posted any number of times: “I am a Bushbot.”
So was I.
And when Bush went any wrong direction, JR complained and led a revolt against that: whether border, security, justices, or the shipping from the mideast thing (I forget the name of it.)
Would I prefer GW Bush to Romney/Obama: you bet I would.
RE: The way each candidate except Romney and Obama keeps getting attacked, one has to believe those who write and push these things are closet liberals.
Indeed. And when you look at which candidates attack whom it becomes evident there have been deals made. In particular, you see Bachmann attacking every other candidate who rises in the polls except the most liberal candidate, Mitt Romney...hmmm.
I see the Romney Sleaze Machine all over this orchestration.
Newt is a bright, articulate conservative who has a hundred good ideas floating around his head at any given moment.
I’ll take him (after Perry) but he should not have brought up anything about illegals.
Something will have to be done, but nothing can be done until the border is secure. At that time some kind of sensible plan can be addressed and I don’t mean cramming them all into boxcars or trucks bound for Mexico.
But Newt underestimated people’s capacity for hate where illegals are concerned.
We can’t handle the truth !!
I am supporting either : in order : Cain, Bachmann, Santorum.
Cain is not coming back. Once the warm glow faded, people realized he has nothing to offer except the nice guy/semi-successful business man thing.
I suggest you take a look at the rest of the field and find someone else you like.
I agree. It doesn’t actually hurt me when people start name calling but it does tend to lower the quality of the debate and make us seem like Occupy Wall Street people.
We could be throwing virtual rocks next.
Supposedly we all want a good, conservative candidate but have different ideas about what’s important to us.
It is not illegal aliens, although that is a problem which can and will be handled.
It’s getting rid of oppressive federal government and Obama care.
It’s creating a business friendly environment so that we can all have jobs.
It’s lowering the power and scope of the federal government and lowering taxes and spending.
It’s drilling for our own oil which will create jobs and free us from the tyranny of the middle east.
It’s getting rid of the EPA whose stupid and costly regulations stifle business.
These are Jim’s words:
****Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to surrender our national sovereignty, our national security and our national defense to the United Nations and other so-called world government bodies. The Democrats do not believe that war is sometimes necessary to defend the nation and or our national interests. The Democrats do not believe that the United States has the right to self-defense. The Democrats do not care about our national security or defending our national sovereignty. It’s not in their game plan. In fact their game plan includes acquiescing to the United Nations, a world court and a world government. There’s absolutely no doubt about it. It’s in the record.
Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to increase our taxes and continue increasing our taxes until they totally destroy our economy and our ability to compete in world markets. Bush is a sworn tax cutter. Kerry is a sworn tax raiser. No doubt about it. It’s in the record.
Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to kiss off our traditional man/woman marriage and from this point on it’ll be anything goes. Bush defends traditional family values and a moral society. Kerry promotes the feminist/abortionist/homosexualist agenda, no matter how absurd, perverse, abhorrent or evil. No doubt about it. It’s in the record.
Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to appoint and confirm nothing but NOW/NAMBLA/Globalist approved feminist/abortionist/homosexualist liberal activist judges. Bush will appoint judges who will abide by the Constitution. Kerry and the Democrats will appoint and confirm only liberal activist judges. Allow this and we can kiss our Constitution and what’s left of our national sovereignty and freedom goodbye. No doubt about it. It’s in the record. Period. End of story.****
I am supporting in order:
Anybody but Romney, Anybody but Romney and Anybody but Romney.
In a winner take all primary I support the following:
The guy most likely to beat Romney, the guy most likely to beat Romney and the guy most likely to beat Romney.
Right now that guy is Gingrich.
It is unproductive using bandwidth to cut him down. In the end such destructive rhetoric does nothing but help Romney.
I have nothing critical to say about Cain, Bachmann or Santorum other than the fact that they are falling in the polls and probably aren't in any position to win the nomination. The three most likely candidates are Romney, Gingrich and Perry. Unfortunately it is in that order.
When your "facts" are lies/distortions then yes, that is an attack.
I know that some of those are simply not true. Newt wasn’t in the House when the DOE was created in 1977. And it was the Senate, not the House, that voted on MFN status for China.
So how many Mexicans and others did Ronald Reagan allow to flow across the southern borders.
So are these.
If it involves letting the illegal aliens stay here, it’s amnesty, troll. We don’t support amnesty on FR.
117 posted on Thu Nov 24 2011 12:41:46 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Gingrich is not proposing amnesty. In fact, he said that new illegals should be deported. No one else uses that language.
His concern was those who've been here quite a while, have families born here and are, therefore, going to be here no matter what, even if on a visitor visa. A work permit or some other non-citizenship status is not amnesty in the sense of Reagan's amnesty.
If it involves letting the illegal aliens stay here, it’s amnesty.
...."But "there is no path to citizenship in my Tuesday night comment on immigration," Gingrich told Newsmax. "There is a path to non-deportation for certified, very long-term community members but they would not have the right to vote."The goal of his plan, Gingrich said, is to gain control of the border in 12 months while ensuring that English is the official language of the U.S. government. He wants even faster rules for the deportation of criminals and a guest worker program "outsourced to American Express, Visa or MasterCard to minimize fraud..."
If it involves letting the illegal aliens stay here, it’s amnesty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.