"Presidenciales EUA, precandidato republicano Newt Gingrich a favor de regularización estatus migratorio de millones"
Translation: US Presidential Candidate Newt Gingrich, Republican, For The Regularization of Immigration Status for Millions"
We have seen this word "regularization" many times in the South of the Border press, used by both President Bush and President Fox, and a euphemism for "amnesty" for illegal aliens. To "regularize" them to stay in the United States.
NO AMNESTY.
NO COMPROMISE!
In door #36 “YES”! You my friend have been here long enough to win ‘AMNESTY’!!! Ding,Ding,Ding
There are many more legal Latino’s in this country than illegals. The legal immigrants went through a long but proper process, and others were born on US soil as citizens by birth. I am not convinced majority of legal residents and citizens are in favor of amnesty to illegals.
Maybe I’m confused.
I thought that Newt said that those who would be allowed to stay would be treated like migrant immigrants, who have been legal for years.
(In fact, the legal migrant workers have suffered because the illegals have been taking their jobs.)
I thought that he would not be in favor of citizenship for these folks, though.
Am I wrong about that?
Mexico destroys family not America.
It is a failed state.
Young people used to go home for the holidays. To the house they grew up in and had so many fond memories. It felt good to be with your family and the friends you grew up with.
Now, young people go to their parent’s house for the holidays. Their house is theirs, you have no attachment to it or the neighborhood because Americans were forced to move out of Los Angeles when Mexicans moved in.
The old neighborhood is unrecognizable with the smell of tamales in the air on Christmas morning.
And Gingrich feels for the invaders.
It amazes and puzzles me as to how many city councils, mayors, police departments, governors, presidents, judges, congressmen and senators, have colluded in protecting these foreign invaders.
How is it possible that almost everyone elected, turns against their own citizens?
How is it possible that no one in government will collect the numbers of illegal aliens?
Newt told us in his CNN debate that they expected to give amnesty to 300,000 illegals and it turned out to be 3,000,000. But for the last 10 years we are told that we have 12,000,000 illegals even though there has never been a stoppage of border crossings, H1-B jumpers or students that overstay their visas?
IMO my tagline predicts the outcome: The DemocRATic party preys on the ignorant!
These people are here for a reason, and that is to do away with the sovereignty of countries and ALL of our politicians are complicit.
Someone, somewhere decided that this is a One World Order whether or not we agree with it or not.
Andrew Stern calls it a One World Order and so does George Soros and the United Nations.
Our elected politicians have sold us out. We are a country of open borders with an obstacle course.
Just like Europe, we have to let anyone into our country that can cross that 5 mile mark from our border. That 5 mile mark is just a game, that border wall is part of the game. If an illegal can live without fear in our country, why have any obstacles to cross?
Why are people dying to cross a desert if all they have to do is get over that damn 5 mile mark? Why do we allow women to get raped and all their possessions stolen? Why are we supporting the cartels that smuggle people into our country?
A woman gets raped and all her possessions stolen. She gets across that 5 mile mark and we pay her for having a child, give her housing, food and daycare as long as she doesn’t hook up with a man that works. Great system we have going on here.
There are at least 50 million ‘southern illegals’ in our country. We need to build a war and bus them back; immediately. Why are they lying????
There are at least 50 million ‘southern illegals’ in our country. We need to build a war and bus them back; immediately. Why are they lying????
Other than sealing the borders (I back it and think it's the crucial first step), kindly tell me the after plan as you foresee it. Instead of just opining on how it should be and calling others names for being realists, I would like to hear what you think is a viable plan in today's climate.
This is an important issue, and one that Newt has the “only-right or correct” answer in order for Republicans to capture the White House. We as Republicans do not force our Religion upon others, but we do politically fight for veiwpoints and legistation that supports our faith. If we as Republicans do not create the defining language on the Issue of Immigration and resolve the current illegal crisis all the abortions in the Dem Party (about 70% of the US total) will not reverse declining populatios and will force Latino’s into the Dem Party just as other minorities and blacks.
1. If you are opposed to ANY form of legalizing illegals, what do we do about the millions of illegals already here?
Do Nothing? Deport them all? BOTH are impossible.
Somewhere in the middle is the answer. To just shout ILLEGAL, ILLEGAL, ILLEGAL, gets us NOWHERE. We just end up with the status quo. So, if you support deporting illegals, you should LOVE Newt's ideas. Under his plans, we would deport MILLIONS! Many, perhaps millions, would SELF DEPORT.
Second, well established illegals could come out of the shadows and pay for their law breaking (just being here illegally is not necessarily a crime) and no longer fear deportation (if accepted).
Illegal is a misnomer. Most illegals (not previously deported) are not committing a CRIME by being here. It is a “Violation”. They can not be sent to prison for it. Held for deportation, but not imprisoned. You should stop being so apoplectic about it. They didn't commit the equivalent of murder, it's more like a speeding ticket.
“The United States Supreme Court has held that “a deportation proceeding is a purely civil action to determine
the eligibility to remain in this country, not to punish an unlawful entry….The purpose of deportation is not to punish past transgressions, but to put an end to a continuing violation of immigration laws.”
So shouting amnesty, AMNESTY, AMNESTY, AMNESTY, and “ILLEGAL means illegal”, actually, it doesn't, gets us nowhere and is factually incorrect.
I can hear the sounds of cheap backpacks zipping shut all over central America as they pack for their trip to el Norte.