Posted on 12/02/2011 8:14:22 AM PST by Retro Llama
Obama could win, just by looking at his potential opponents.
Is this really a payroll tax cut?
I put his chances of reelection at less than 25%.
Reelections of incumbents are all about the incumbent. His record will be a difficult thing to run on.
Obama could win, just by looking at his potential opponents.
The ignorance of some people knows no bounds.
Does capital in the hands of the public, or taxes in the hands of the government produce more self-sustaining jobs? It's one or the other brain-trusts.
At what point would taxes be enough? Was it enough when payroll deductions were created for the first time, at roughly 2%? Was it enough at 5%? Was it enough at 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30%? Is it enough today? The Left says no.
I state right here and now that the federal government and the Left will never be happy until they get all all capital, and dole it out to us as they see fit.
I say, draw the line in the sand now. Enough is enough. Not one red cent more you Lefty assholes.
I'm not buying off on them dividing us by income level, and attack us separately. We stand together!
Tax the currently untaxed.
LOL. You can’t get money from people who don’t have it.
Reelections of incumbents are all about the incumbent. His record will be a difficult thing to run on.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________He’s not running on his record. He might win becase:
#1. He will have a $Billion warchest and
#2. The backing of:
A. The Chicago Thug-style politcal machine.
B. 95 percent of the Black vote
C. The Unions
D. The Gays
E. The Media
F. Hollywood
G. Environmentalist wackos and
H. Every American who has the IQ of a can of Spam
It will be a very nasty and close election.
“But to many conservatives, the presidents proposed new payroll tax holiday is not a net tax cut, because it requires the US Treasury to make up for the shortfall in payroll tax revenue to the Social Security Trust funds by transferring general funds there. Those general funds would have to be supplied by borrowing or, in the president's plan, tax hikes on the rich.
Its not a tax cut, and it threatens the integrity of Social Security, says Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee.
He notes that, by the Democrats’ own figures, it will take 10 years for the surtax on the wealthy to recoup lost revenues from Obama’s one-year extension and expansion of the payroll tax holiday. That means borrowing to cover the shortfall in the meantime.”
Payroll tax cut: why Republicans might back Obama’s plan (VIDEO)yahoo News
Obama is proposing paying for a one year FICA/SS taxcut with a 10 year surcharge on the rich. You dont hear them talking about that minor detail.
See my tag-line
Rich people are job creators every time they invest in a business directly or via buying stock. They need not be directly hiring people in order to be creating jobs.
This payroll “tax cut” is a joke ...as if a business would just go out an hire someone for a $1500 break in the payroll tax. For a laugh go to the White House web site for an explanation of how this will create jobs. The idiots in the White House do not understand that in hiring someone you are expecting that their work will generate new revenues that more than cover the cost of their salary, benefits, their part of the business overhead as well as a portion of your profit. The GOP is right to say this is nonsense, but just go along with it so Obama doesn’t have new ammunition to say Republicans are anti-tax cuts for workers. Barry’s tax cut won’t create any jobs and will just cause Social Security to go bankrupt a little quicker.
Ultimately, all job creation is based on demand — businesses hire people to create the goods and services people buy. Putting more money in people’s pockets to spend is the root pump-primer.
I certainly understand that the election is not over but...
1. Money does not win elections. In O’s case, he will use the money to attack his opponent but he is still stuck with his record.
2. Dems have had the backing of all of those groups for my lifetime and in the last election (their high water mark since 1964) they only received 52-53% of the vote. Clinton never exceeded 50%.
Even those with the intelligence of a can of spam understand that they cannot get a job.
GOP come next November “As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!”.
LLS
You can get labor. The rest of us are effectively slaves working part time for the gov’t.
Tax welfare, food stamps, etc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.