Posted on 12/03/2011 6:47:57 PM PST by Grig
Of course what he doesn't get is rebuttal to what is posted...
Which given the citations is understandable.
Galatians 6:9
And let us not be weary in well doing for in due season we shall reap if we faint not.
this isn’t the religion forum you idiots. so stuff it. All it is, is annoying spam.
.
Its right about Noot, but wrong about Romney.
.
What I see is Paul listing several proofs of the Resurrection existing and being universal, and includes the practice of baptism for the dead as an example.
What the text records:
29 Now if there is no resurrection, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people baptized for them? 30 And as for us, why do we endanger ourselves every hour? 31 I face death every dayyes, just as surely as I boast about you in Christ Jesus our Lord. 32 If I fought wild beasts in Ephesus with no more than human hopes, what have I gained? If the dead are not raised,
Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.
33 Do not be misled: Bad company corrupts good character. 34 Come back to your senses as you ought, and stop sinning; for there are some who are ignorant of GodI say this to your shame.
Both Noot and Mutt can be counted on to govern left.
Both have proven records of doing so, and in addition, Newt even goes so far as to sabotage conservatives.
Newt also advocated drilling in the US back in ‘08....”Drill Here, Drill Now”.
MORMONism says: Baptism for the dead is what we do BECAUSE the Bible has been corrupted.
Christianity says: Baptism for the dead is what folks OTHER than Christians do, because they claim the Bible has been corrupted; with no proof.
Were you to pay closer attention to the context, Paul repeatedly uses words like "us", "we", etc in an INCLUSIVE manner. That is until vs 29 where an exclusive term "THEY" is used twice. It is clear that Paul is referencing someone OTHER than the Christians at Corinth. If the rite was a legitimate part of apostolic teaching, we might have expected the apostle to say what shall you do . . . or what shall we do . . .
Second, there is absolutely no TEACHING in the verse, it is only MENTIONED.
Paul, within a greater context was arguing against those who said there was no resurrection. These false teachers are inconsistent: they deny the resurrection, yet engage in a practice baptism for the dead which is based on the hope of resurrection.
Ironically, the Encyclopedia of Mormonism espouses much the same interpretation of the verse: ... Paul clearly refers to a distinct group within the Church, a group that he accuses of inconsistency between ritual and doctrine. Again, this is a group OUTSIDE of orthodoxy of Christianity so much as not to be considered Christian - "they". Paul associates the practice with false teachers and teachings.
" Newt has had heroic convenient changes of mind position."
.
We Whores of Babylon salute you for your honesty.
>> “Both Romney and Newt share the belief that government is the solution. That all we need is to ‘fix’ the system and make it work better.
.
They are different faces of the same corrupt static Politics as Usual Establishment coin.” <<
.
Exactly.
Well why not?
You've 'accepted' heresy from a PROVEN conman and liar.
Are you SURE?
take your spam and stick it up your ass
But I'm a spam LOVER; I cant help it!
take your spam and stick it up your ass
But he DO get jollies!!
WOW Mr. M you are totally fixated on people’s rectums, you have asked, no demanded that posters on FR put everything in a violent fashion there in about ten posts now.
What a strange little person you are.
I’ll just go with this one instead:
“And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.”
Genesis 1:12
Call me a purist.....
:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.