To: YankeeReb
I agree with you. With Newt as the nominee, even states such as mine, Indiana, will be back in play again for Obama.
To: Carolyn826
If people are really going to refuse to vote for a candidate (and in turn, let Obama win, who is far, far, far, far, far worse on the issue) who has voted pro-life 99% of the time simply because of this, then there is little hope for this nation.
While it's one thing to disagree with Newt on this, there isn't any legislation, proposed or otherwise, that this particular detail will make one iota of difference on in how he votes on that legislation.
37 posted on
12/04/2011 4:01:56 PM PST by
RockinRight
(If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
To: Carolyn826
If people are really going to refuse to vote for a candidate (and in turn, let Obama win, who is far, far, far, far, far worse on the issue) who has voted pro-life 99% of the time simply because of this, then there is little hope for this nation.
While it's one thing to disagree with Newt on this, there isn't any legislation, proposed or otherwise, that this particular detail will make one iota of difference on in how he votes on that legislation.
38 posted on
12/04/2011 4:02:08 PM PST by
RockinRight
(If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
To: Carolyn826
If people are really going to refuse to vote for a candidate (and in turn, let Obama win, who is far, far, far, far, far worse on the issue) who has voted pro-life 99% of the time simply because of this, then there is little hope for this nation.
While it's one thing to disagree with Newt on this, there isn't any legislation, proposed or otherwise, that this particular detail will make one iota of difference on in how he votes on that legislation.
39 posted on
12/04/2011 4:02:25 PM PST by
RockinRight
(If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
To: Carolyn826
If people are really going to refuse to vote for a candidate (and in turn, let Obama win, who is far, far, far, far, far worse on the issue) who has voted pro-life 99% of the time simply because of this, then there is little hope for this nation.
While it's one thing to disagree with Newt on this, there isn't any legislation, proposed or otherwise, that this particular detail will make one iota of difference on in how he votes on that legislation.
40 posted on
12/04/2011 4:02:38 PM PST by
RockinRight
(If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
To: Carolyn826; All
With Newt as the nominee, even states such as mine, Indiana, will be back in play again for Obama.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I’m so disappointed in this turn of events. One lady on FOX says Newt has a way of always imploding. So, now, SOMEBODY PLEASE TELL ME WHAT DO WE DO NOW? Do we root for Santorum to make a good showing in Iowa and become a viable candidate and have a chance of becoming the nominee? Somebody help me out here.
67 posted on
12/04/2011 5:13:26 PM PST by
no dems
(Why do you never see "Obama" bumper stickers on cars going to work in the morning?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson