Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Facing their last moments with a smile: The Chinese women about to be executed for drug smuggling
Daily Mail ^ | 5th December 2011 | By Rick Dewsbury

Posted on 12/05/2011 1:08:50 PM PST by Niuhuru

A young woman sits cross-legged on the ground laughing playfully as she is fed a lychee. Another plays cards in pair of baggy pink pyjamas.

The moving images could show any group of young women as they go about their daily lives in prison.

But just hours - and in some cases minutes - after the pictures were taken, each of the four women were led into a concrete yard and executed.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: china; drugs; execution; prison; smuggling; wod; wodlist; women; wosd; young
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Niuhuru

I have to admit that I don’t have any more sympathy for drug smugglers today, than I did when this was posted yesterday.

Couldn’t care less if they wore pants rather than skirts: a criminal is a criminal.


41 posted on 12/05/2011 5:42:39 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Si, se puede: uno inmigrante ilegale a la vez! Mi corazón sangra como un nabo*. *turnip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL
I'm all for the war on drugs

Ah, so you believe the Commerce Clause delegates such authority to fedgov. Enjoy Obamacare.

(especially considering the alternative)

Like following the original Commerce Clause and Tenth Amendment? How awful.

42 posted on 12/05/2011 7:13:12 PM PST by Ken H (Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The Butcher's of Beijing are getting their cut of the illegal drug trade, but let's kill destitute peasant women for doing whatever it takes to put food on their families' tables. Punish the monkey, let the organ grinder go.
Not to mention that their organs will go for a tidy sum on the open market.
43 posted on 12/05/2011 7:19:03 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Approved by Mao Ze Dunn!

44 posted on 12/05/2011 8:53:08 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

“Ah, so you believe the Commerce Clause delegates such authority to fedgov. Enjoy Obamacare. “

Yea, I think the Constitution gives the federal government control over what crosses our borders.

I know, it’s a radical concept for some people.


45 posted on 12/06/2011 12:58:51 AM PST by BobL ("Heartless" and "Inhumane" FReepers for Cain - we've HAD ENOUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BobL
Yea, I think the Constitution gives the federal government control over what crosses our borders.

Of course. Congress has power to regulate commerce with foreign nations. However,the drug war also includes Congress's use of the Commerce Clause to set intrastate drug policies, rather than the states under the Tenth Amendment.

Were you aware that two appeals court justices, both friends of Scalia, cited his opinion in the Raich case to uphold Obamacare?

__________________________________________

Both Silberman and Sutton cited Scalia's opinion in 2005 upholding strict federal regulation of marijuana in the case of Angel Raich, a Californian who used home-grown marijuana to relieve her pain. "If Congress could regulate Angel Raich when she grew marijuana on her property for self-consumption," Sutton wrote, "it is difficult to say Congress may not regulate the 50 million Americans who self-finance their medical care."

http://mobile.latimes.com/p.p?a=rp&m=b&postId=1165037

__________________________________________

Do you think the Constitution gives the federal government control over intrastate drug policies?

46 posted on 12/06/2011 2:14:40 AM PST by Ken H (Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
This has nothing to do with what you posted, but check this out. Thomas's warning in the Raich case has proven to be very prescient.

______________________________________

Thomas: Respondents Diane Monson and Angel Raich use marijuana that has never been bought or sold, that has never crossed state lines, and that has had no demonstrable effect on the national market for marijuana. If Congress can regulate this under the Commerce Clause, then it can regulate virtually anything, and the Federal Government is no longer one of limited and enumerated powers.

______________________________________

Sutton: "If Congress could regulate Angel Raich when she grew marijuana on her property for self-consumption," Sutton wrote, "it is difficult to say Congress may not regulate the 50 million Americans who self-finance their medical care."

47 posted on 12/06/2011 4:40:38 AM PST by Ken H (Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Joseph Story predicicted it 200 years ago,


48 posted on 12/06/2011 6:36:05 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
I have to admit that I don’t have any more sympathy for drug smugglers today, than I did when this was posted yesterday.

Couldn’t care less if they wore pants rather than skirts: a criminal is a criminal.

Do you think the US justice system is perfect? How about the Chinese justice system?

That's the problem with these executions.

49 posted on 12/06/2011 6:40:41 AM PST by whd23 (Every time a link is de-blogged an angel gets its wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan; elkfersupper; allmendream; Yossarian; rellimpank; Talisker; varyouga
Oh look who just learned a new word today.

ConservaTexan..... YOU have a lot to learn about the brutal Chinese Communist regime and their kangaroo court system.

50 posted on 12/06/2011 9:18:32 AM PST by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan; elkfersupper; allmendream; Yossarian; rellimpank; Talisker; varyouga
Oh look who just learned a new word today.

ConservaTexan..... YOU have a lot to learn about the brutal Chinese Communist regime and their kangaroo court system.

51 posted on 12/06/2011 9:18:42 AM PST by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Freedom of speech and freedom of religion is treated as a banned narcotic in Communist China.


52 posted on 12/06/2011 9:21:19 AM PST by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Thomas's warning in the Raich case has proven to be very prescient.

Thomas: Respondents Diane Monson and Angel Raich use marijuana that has never been bought or sold, that has never crossed state lines, and that has had no demonstrable effect on the national market for marijuana. If Congress can regulate this under the Commerce Clause, then it can regulate virtually anything, and the Federal Government is no longer one of limited and enumerated powers.

Sutton: "If Congress could regulate Angel Raich when she grew marijuana on her property for self-consumption," Sutton wrote, "it is difficult to say Congress may not regulate the 50 million Americans who self-finance their medical care."

Nice find, Ken!

There you have it, FReepers: either both Obamacare and the federal War On Drugs are constitutional, or neither are. Which side are you on?

53 posted on 12/06/2011 10:54:33 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

The end is justifying the means. Nobody’s going to own up to the collateral damage and unintended consequences.


54 posted on 12/06/2011 11:09:02 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: whd23
The comments are referring to the tear jerk Mail-Online article posted.

Do you think they would have written anything, let alone anything so blatently tear jerking, had the accused convicted been male?

And, system imperfections (NO system on earth is perfect) aside, I don't give a damn in Hell if every druggie dropped dead; at least they would provide work for grave diggers, an honest occupation.

55 posted on 12/06/2011 11:19:47 AM PST by ApplegateRanch ("Public service" does NOT mean servicing the people, like a bull among heifers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ravager
I can explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you. It is not my fault your public education puts you at a disadvantage.

average (not a mistake)...YOU have a lot to learn about the literary devices of what may or may not be your native language.

56 posted on 12/06/2011 11:44:45 AM PST by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan
Do you always defend your intellectual short comings with sugarcoated insults and nonsensical psychobabble?
57 posted on 12/06/2011 12:29:33 PM PST by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan
You have explained yourself enough already. Its quite evident to all the posters now. So don't sweat it.
58 posted on 12/06/2011 12:34:49 PM PST by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ravager

Arguing with you is not worth my time, so you are right, I am an idiot. Does that make you feel better? Now please go away, NOOB.


59 posted on 12/06/2011 12:36:57 PM PST by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan

You are arguing semantic nuances while totally oblivious of the context of the article. You are not worth your own time let alone that of others.


60 posted on 12/06/2011 12:41:28 PM PST by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson