Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court sets Obama healthcare arguments
Reuters/Yahoo ^ | 12/19/11 | James Vicini

Posted on 12/19/2011 11:43:56 AM PST by markomalley

Oral arguments on President Barack Obama's sweeping U.S. healthcare overhaul will last 5-1/2 hours spread over three days from March 26-28, the Supreme Court said on Monday.

The Supreme Court last month agreed to hear the 5-1/2 hours of oral arguments, one of the lengthiest arguments in recent years. There have been similar marathon sessions in a handful of big cases dating back over the past 70 years.

The court said it would hear one hour of arguments on March 26 on whether the legal challenges to the requirement that all Americans buy insurance must wait until after that part of the law has taken effect in 2014.

At issue is a federal law, the Anti-Injunction Act, and whether the requirement that Americans buy insurance or pay a penalty is effectively a tax covered by that law and can only be challenged after the penalty has been imposed.

The court said it would hear two hours of arguments on March 27 on the constitutional issue at the heart of the battle -- whether Congress overstepped its powers by adopting the insurance purchase requirement known as the individual mandate.

(Excerpt) Read more at old.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: bhohealthcare; choosewisely; commiecare; donttreadonme; healthinsurance; individualmandate; obama; obamacare; scotus; socialism; socialisthealthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Repeal 16-17

LOL


21 posted on 12/19/2011 5:13:52 PM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; OldDeckHand; tired_old_conservative; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; ...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

22 posted on 12/19/2011 7:42:02 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topfile

If it goes the “wrong” way, I’ll be purchasing some tar and feathers and a ticket to Capitol Hill where this monstrosity was invented.


23 posted on 12/19/2011 8:00:01 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

You forget Obama pissed off the SCOTUS during his state of the union lawyers like elephants do not forget.......


24 posted on 12/19/2011 9:18:51 PM PST by straps (Electric Jack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: straps

Great point.

However, Chairman Obama has shown NO respect for the US Constitution since his birth in Kenya.

His High Poo-Bahness probably views, (with his typical arrogant scorn), THE NINE SUPREMES as irrelevant to the harm he has been chosen to do to America.

BTW, FDR tried to pack the US Supreme Court to insure that the USA became a Socialist Nation very quickly. Now that we are FINALLY the Union of Socialist States in Amerika (USSA), maybe Dictator Obama will simply abolish the 4 th Branch of Government?


25 posted on 12/19/2011 9:35:48 PM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: topfile

Volts.


26 posted on 12/20/2011 7:22:54 AM PST by dools0007world
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

Thanks for the post, but I am not familiar with Kagan’s Conflict of Interest regarding this case, and so likewise don’t understand why The Law regarding Recusal would require her to not participate in this decision. Would you please explain so I can point this out to others who, like me, are not so well informed?


27 posted on 12/20/2011 1:04:24 PM PST by juno67 (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

What do they possibly have to do that they set those specific dates for such a huge case with huge implications?


28 posted on 12/20/2011 4:01:18 PM PST by wastedyears (Not too long you devious little parathyroid. Soon I'll be rid of you and I'll be free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: juno67

Kagen was working in Solictor General’s office, advising on Obamacare pending Legislation, and LIED to the Senate during Confirmation Hearings, saying she had NO PERSONAL INVOLVEMENT in Obamacare. Subsequent emails discovered AFTER her Appointment showed she was directly involved in advising the Office of The President.


29 posted on 12/20/2011 5:27:16 PM PST by traditional1 (Free speech for me.....not for thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
Those who assailed Newt Gingrich for his proposals to curb the excesses of the federal judiciary ought to reconsider their charges in the context of Kagan's refusal to recuse herself.

There is nothing short of impeachment which can require her to recuse herself unless one begins to look at the sort of remedies proposed by Gingrich. The arrogance of Kagan in declining recuse herself, indeed, the arrogance of Obama is appointing her further supports the view that the federal judiciary has grown so arrogant as to require a rebalancing of the powers of the four branches of government. In case you were wondering, I include the states as the fourth branch which is a rather quaint view considering the court's rulings for 75 years or so.


30 posted on 12/20/2011 7:31:00 PM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; onyx; STARWISE; maggief; Liz; penelopesire

Almost missed this. Wish there was something we could do (beside pray) between now and then to assure an outcome we can all LIVE with.


31 posted on 12/21/2011 10:57:25 AM PST by hoosiermama (We need more Jobs.....Steve Jobs....entrepreneurs and creators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

“Obama”care” was robo-signed by Congress, and is therefore illegal.”

Would it have made you happier to be signed by someone not constitutionally eligible to be POTUS? SCOTUS seems to have ignored that minor issue as well...


32 posted on 12/21/2011 12:47:50 PM PST by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DrC

“Happy” to me is a small, frugal, Federal Government.

For the last 80 years, we have become a political system that has degenerated to a level that makes it very easy for an incompetent alien to become our Dictator. It is all well and good to blame Chairman Obama for finding the soft underbelly of our degenerated political system. I mainly blame his supporters.

However, no dictator has power without the active support of others. The Socialist-Democrat wing of the Democrat Party have been essential to Bolshevik Obama’s success in destroying America’s banks, hospitals, doctors, insurance companies, large companies, small business, and now his final goal, destruction of the middle class.

The basic enemy to America is the idea system that supports the values that enabled Bolshevik Obama to destroy as much of America as he has.

Princes Nancy “Bottleneck” Pelosi famously said about the 2,000 page Obama”care” bill: “We have to pass the bill, so we can find out what is in it.” RINO Boehner has replaced Pelosi, but fails to understand that the 15 Trillion dollar is the end of the financial “road” for America. ( One bottleneck removed.)

Senator Harry “Bottleneck” Reid is the leader of the Socialist-Democrat Party, and as such is the primary enabler of spendaholic, incompetent, Chairman Obama. (One bottleneck still in place.)

Replacing “Bottleneck” Reid would help, but the idea system of the Socialist-Democrat Party will still be a major counter-culture force. It is essential that that idea is defeated.

Structural changes must be made, but it probably will take a long, drawn-out Constitutional Convention to achieve a much-weakened power of the President, a mechanism to over-ride bottleneck positions such as the Speaker of the House, and the Senate Majority Leader, such as a 60 day limit on delaying a Bill sent to the other house before it is debated for no less than 1 week.

When Congress stopped using the “system of checks and balances,” it has been a downhill slide ever since.

Thus, what we have is a tyrannical, debate-less,budget-less, winner-take-all, bankrupt Nation where NO elected politician has the courage to stand up and be held accountable.

BTW, if any of this is what you also have observed, then pass it on. That would make me VERY happy!

Merry Christmas!


33 posted on 12/21/2011 8:31:12 PM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: topfile

broccoli


34 posted on 12/22/2011 8:15:42 AM PST by dervish (female candidates: the last frontier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson