Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three hurt in Sunderland street slashings (product of an unarmed society)
Sunderland Echo ^ | 24th Dec, 2011 | NA

Posted on 12/24/2011 10:36:03 AM PST by yank in the UK

THREE men suffered slash wounds in a dawn street attack today.

The disturbance happened in Holmeside, in Sunderland city centre, at 4am, leaving two men with injuries to their arm and the third with facial injuries.

A 16-year-old boy and an 18-year-old man were arrested at the scene outside Cash in a Flash on suspicion of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm. They remain in custody today.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: crime; criminal; unarmed; victim
Unprovoked attacks like this happen on a daily basis. This is what happens very frequently in an unarmed society.
1 posted on 12/24/2011 10:36:11 AM PST by yank in the UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

I thought all sharp knives had been outlawed in the UK


2 posted on 12/24/2011 10:46:03 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

It’s only illegal to have sharp knives outside of the kitchen


3 posted on 12/24/2011 10:50:26 AM PST by yank in the UK (decapitation before capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

“I gave up my firearms, and all I got was this slash at Cash in a Flash.”


4 posted on 12/24/2011 11:12:27 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK
Mean looks led to shooting deaths of 2 Fresno teens
5 posted on 12/24/2011 11:31:33 AM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

And if those people had been armed, and the attackers had reason to know or suspect this (”armed society”), they would’ve just been attacked from the rear. Do you shoot anyone who walks behind you? The bad guys can adapt to circumstances quicker than you can draw a gun. The problem is not a lack of guns, but scum who will attack you without notice or provocation.

Merry (and safe) Christmas!


6 posted on 12/24/2011 12:11:21 PM PST by Moltke (Always retaliate first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moltke

Yes, but in an unarmed society the scum view everyone they see as a victim, in a polite society (armed) the thugs are a lot more cautious because anyone could be a formidable opponent. I don’t think it is a coincidence that England has a higher violent crime rate then the US and South Africa combined (according to UN stats)


7 posted on 12/24/2011 12:25:10 PM PST by yank in the UK (decapitation before capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Moltke
The knife wounds were not lethal. Had the victims been properly armed, the attackers might have ended up DRT. If Britons were allowed to defend themselves, the attackers might have been culled from the population in some previous incident.
8 posted on 12/24/2011 12:26:10 PM PST by Ragnar54 (America's enemy: Obama replaced Osama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

Britain has always had a knife crime problem.

The famous Glasgow gangs of the 1930’s to today, East End London gangsters ‘tooled up’ with bayonets and flick knives from the 1920’s to the 70’s....

They happened when Britain had more guns. When police and courts and prison were more robust and brutal. When most men had served in the forces. When the UK was much less PC and wimpy than today. The unarmed argument is a red herring.

The historical use of knives as opposed to guns in the UK IS the result of Britain never having been a gun owning populace on the scale of the US.


9 posted on 12/24/2011 12:27:11 PM PST by the scotsman (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK; Ragnar54
Your points are duly noted. MY point was (and is) that there are a myriad of "ifs", hypothetical situations, and a gun is NOT an "invincibilaty cloak". We can speculate back and forth to the next year, but *if* I were a bad guy intent on harming someone, I would always have the advantage of surprise, while the victim could only react (if at all).

A polite society is a polite society, an armed society is just armed. You see, I dare question the dictum that an armed society is without violent crime. That somehow gets it backwards, IMO.

If the UK violent crime rate is indeed higher than that of the US and S.A. *combined* (obviously not in absolute numbers), then perhaps the UK needs to go back and read Enoch Powell, and act accordingly. The underlying reason for all that crime is painfully (no pun intended) obvious, yet we all know that those in power have no intention at all in addressing it.

Violent crime is a part of any society, but in a homogeneous society it is always less so. Simple, obvious, but not part of the politically correct agenda of any western government.

THAT is the problem that really needs to be addressed. Guns or no guns is just so much window dressing. (And I like my guns as much as the next FReeper, for the record.)

10 posted on 12/24/2011 1:24:27 PM PST by Moltke (Always retaliate first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

“This is what happens very frequently in an unarmed society. “

It is 16 times more likely that someone will break into a home in England, knowing somebody is home, than in the USA. In the USA nun-chucks are legal. If that was my only choice I’d carry them and I’d be good with them. Instead, since I’m an old fart, my minim carry piece is a .380 with (plastic) Glaser rounds. The Glaser has the same lethality as a full metal jacket .45ACP.


11 posted on 12/24/2011 2:32:08 PM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

The UK rate has been explained here by myself and others before.

The ‘high rate’ is partly due to the fact of the reporting and collation of crime. There are TWENTY EIGHT different types of assault charge in the UK. Taking a ship out with a unwilling crew in unsafe/dangerous conditions is considered an assault against the crew. I am not kidding, its on the statute books. America?. FOUR different types.

Britain (pop 60m) has about 900 gun deaths a year.
America (pop 300m) has 30000, half of those homicide.
Even multiplied by 5, the UK gun murder rate would be 4500, still around a quarter of the US number.

Many American cities singularly have murder rates that are higher than the whole UK and Ireland combined.

For example, 3000 people died in NI and Britain during the IRA/Loyalist terrorist years 1969-1994. 3000 in 25 years. NY, Detroit, Chicago, Washington and Miami all had more murders than that EVERY YEAR!.

The figures for rape in the UK are quite a bit less than the US, and of course a million miles less than SA.

The idea that the UK is more dangerous than either the US or South Africa is ridiculous. To suggest its worse than both combined is insane. Yes, there has been a rise in British crime and the UK is less safe than 1960, 1970, 1980 or even 1990, but that rise has come from a very low level of crime.

It is not for nothing that the UK, be it England, Scotland, Wales and even (the terrorist-haunted) NI have been famous for decades until very recently for being safe countries with low levels of crime, violent and non violent, where the police didnt need to be armed, and even criminals usually didnt use violence....

I am a 41 yr old male, who has been the victim of crime twice in my adult life. Thats twice in 23 years, and one was theft and the other attempted burglary and assault.

I have lived in America, spent 99% of my life in the UK, and have family and friends who have lived in post apartheid SA. I KNOW that Britain, for all its rise in crime over the last 20 years, is still a far safer country to live in than either America or South Africa.


12 posted on 12/24/2011 8:02:22 PM PST by the scotsman (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

Wonderful post mate. Shame it will be largely ignored


13 posted on 12/24/2011 8:40:20 PM PST by Mitch86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mitch86

“And if those people had been armed, and the attackers had reason to know or suspect this (”armed society”), they would’ve just been attacked from the rear. Do you shoot anyone who walks behind you? The bad guys can adapt to circumstances quicker than you can draw a gun. The problem is not a lack of guns, but scum who will attack you without notice or provocation.”.....

Unless he plans to kill me from behind (with his knife), I can still put several rounds in his ass as he is running away. I’ll take my Glock over any knife, every time.


14 posted on 12/25/2011 5:11:43 AM PST by Progov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK
Unprovoked attacks like this happen on a daily basis. This is what happens very frequently in an unarmed society.

Seven People Found Dead in Dallas-Area Apartment

15 posted on 12/25/2011 7:17:33 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson