Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holder's Racial Politics: The AG's attack on voter ID laws may backfire legally and politically.
The Wall Street Journal ^ | December 30, 2011 | The Wall Street Journal

Posted on 12/30/2011 7:02:36 PM PST by Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

Holder's Racial Politics

Eric Holder must be amazed that President Obama was elected and he could become Attorney General. That's a fair inference after the Attorney General last Friday blocked South Carolina's voter ID law on grounds that it would hurt minorities. What a political abuse of law.

In a letter to South Carolina's government, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Thomas Perez called the state law—which would require voters to present one of five forms of photo ID at the polls—a violation of Section 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Overall, he noted, 8.4% of the state's registered white voters lack photo ID, compared to 10% of nonwhite voters.

This is the yawning chasm the Justice Department is now using to justify the unprecedented federal intrusion into state election law, and the first denial of a "pre-clearance" Voting Rights request since 1994.

The 1965 Voting Rights Act was created to combat the systematic disenfranchisement of minorities, especially in Southern states with a history of discrimination. But the Justice position is a lead zeppelin, contradicting both the Supreme Court and the Department's own precedent. In 2005, Justice approved a Georgia law with the same provisions and protections of the one Mr. Holder nixed for South Carolina. In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board that an Indiana law requiring photo ID did not present an undue burden on voters.

As African-American men at the most exalted reaches of government, Messrs. Obama and Holder are a testament to how much racial progress the country has made. It's a shame to see them pretending little has changed so they can scare up some votes

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: corruption; democratcorruption; democrats; democratvoterfraud; electionfraud; elections; ericholder; fraud; holder; holdertruthfile; howtostealanelection; liberalfascism; obama; perez; politicalabuse; voterfraud; voterid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last
A study by the University of Missouri on turnout in Indiana showed that turnout actually increased by about 2 percentage points overall in Indiana in 2006 in the first election after the voter ID law went into effect.[17] There was no evidence that counties with higher percentages of minority, poor, elderly, or less-educated populations suffered any reduction in voter turnout. In fact, “the only consistent and statistically significant impact of photo ID in Indiana is to increase voter turnout in counties with a greater percentage of Democrats relative to other counties.”[18] In September 2007, The Heritage Foundation released a study analyzing the 2004 election turnout data for all states. This study found that voter ID laws do not reduce the turnout of voters, including African–Americans and Hispanics. Such voters were just as likely to vote in states with ID as in states where just their names were asked at the polling place.[19] A study by the University of Delaware and the University of Nebraska–Lincoln examined data from the 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006 elections. At both the aggregate and individual levels, the study found that voter ID laws do not affect turnout, including across racial/ethnic/socioeconomic lines. The study concludes that “concerns about voter identification laws affecting turnout are much ado about nothing.”[20] A survey by American University of registered voters in Maryland, Indiana, and Mississippi to see whether registered voters had photo IDs concluded that “showing a photo ID as a requirement of voting does not appear to be a serious problem in any of the states” because “[a]lmost all registered voters have an acceptable form of photo ID.”[21] Less than 0.5 percent of respondents had neither a photo ID nor citizenship documentation. A 2008 election survey of 12,000 registered voters in all 50 states found that fewer than nine people were unable to vote because of voter ID requirements.[22] In 2010, a Rasmussen poll of likely voters in the United States showed overwhelming support (82 percent) for requiring photo ID in order to vote in elections. This support runs across ethnic and racial lines; Rasmussen reports that “[t]his is a sentiment that spans demographics, as majorities in every demographic agree.”[23] A similar study by John Lott in 2006 also found no effect on voter turnout and, in fact, found an indication that reducing voter fraud (through means such as voter ID) may have a positive impact on voter turnout.[24]
1 posted on 12/30/2011 7:02:42 PM PST by Comrade Brother Abu Bubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

In 1965 a former roommate of mine went to register to vote and the man in charge took a gun out of a desk drawer and put it on the desk. She turned right around and filed a suit under the brand-new Voting Rights Act, won, and became the first registered black voter in her county.

That’s the power of the Voting Rights Act.

Now, unfortunately, it is being perverted in an attempt to facilitate fraud.

Nothing could intimidate my roommate, and nothing will or can intimidate those who LAWFULLY intend to vote.


2 posted on 12/30/2011 7:15:46 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

At what point is a state going to exercise its right of nullification and tell the federal government it has no authority over state matters? I realize the hell which would descend on the state, but at some point a group of states needs to stand up to the bully. Texas tried and failed, but a large enough group could scare the government.


3 posted on 12/30/2011 7:17:24 PM PST by ElectronVolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

Bookmark


4 posted on 12/30/2011 7:17:50 PM PST by Publius6961 (My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; ...
RE :"South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley tells us she "will absolutely sue" Justice over its denial of her state's law and that challenge will go directly to federal district court in Washington, D.C. From there it may be appealed directly to the Supreme Court, which would have to consider whether South Carolina can be blocked from implementing a law identical to the one the High Court approved for Indiana, simply because South Carolina is a "covered" jurisdiction under the Voting Rights Act."

I saw a rare case where a MSNBC show actually had a guest on that commented realistically during their daily complain segment about Holder's lawsuit against the SC voter ID law. (It was one of the evening shows.) She actually admitted that Holder's action could backfire politically in the election by making it look like Obama/Democrats are encouraging voter fraud.

A bit of history, the renewal/passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act used against SC here was one of the last acts of the Republican majority in congress fall 2006 and signed by GWB.

5 posted on 12/30/2011 7:19:32 PM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElectronVolt

Well, a bunch of us tried just that back in 1861—Didn’t work out too well.


6 posted on 12/30/2011 7:20:53 PM PST by Arm_Bears (Journalists first; then the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

She did not go on to be a bitter liberal, that’s good. (She’s smart, she sees bitter liberals would do just what this guy did the moment she became a trifle inconvenient.)


7 posted on 12/30/2011 7:22:47 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Racial parity was a Republican ideal. Democrats gave Jim Crow to America. The irony.


8 posted on 12/30/2011 7:26:25 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Holder's action could backfire politically in the election by making it look like Obama/Democrats are encouraging voter fraud.

Its a little hard to defend it as anything else.

For that matter we could look at where they're trying to stop it and where they aren't. Our Michigan voter ID law was coming into force they year that Obama was elected but they aren't suing over it here. They are trying to prevent purging our voter rolls though.
9 posted on 12/30/2011 7:26:25 PM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ElectronVolt

Every federal mandate has a monetary value. States will adhere to the federal mandate, or forfeit money. Same ole BS. Follow the money.


10 posted on 12/30/2011 7:36:37 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Constitutional Conservatism is Americanism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
It's all a red herring.Holder just needs to build up street cred and use his race card to run a diversion for Obama.Republicans should not put up with this crap.Who does not have i.d. in today's society.Especially if your mooching off the government.
11 posted on 12/30/2011 7:38:24 PM PST by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Ping!

Ole holder is messing with your state!


12 posted on 12/30/2011 7:41:50 PM PST by basil (It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

The real reason Democrats don’t want photo IDs required is so that it is easier to cheat. Holder and the rest know it.


13 posted on 12/30/2011 7:43:30 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
"In 1965 a former roommate of mine went to register to vote and the man in charge took a gun out of a desk drawer and put it on the desk. She turned right around and filed a suit under the brand-new Voting Rights Act, won, and became the first registered black voter in her county."

That's beautiful.

14 posted on 12/30/2011 7:51:19 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

It’s not “racial progress” when bigots like Obama and Holder are in office.

In fact, it’s a testament to just the opposite


15 posted on 12/30/2011 7:52:40 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat (MERRY CHRISTMAS to the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shanover

Gotta show ID to get food stamps!


16 posted on 12/30/2011 7:52:51 PM PST by CIDKauf (No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

We have to show an id when we vote in Ohio...but in South Carolina this is considered a violation of Voting Rights Act?

I don’t get it.


17 posted on 12/30/2011 7:59:05 PM PST by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Comrade Brother Abu Bubba.


18 posted on 12/30/2011 8:04:04 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Merry Christmas, Happy New Year! May 2013 be even Happier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

Anyone who isn’t responsible enough to carry ID isn’t responsible enough to vote. I mean how much of a moron do you have to be to be an adult with no ID?


19 posted on 12/30/2011 8:06:21 PM PST by Bullish (Recovery won't begin until Obama loses HIS job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

Many states perform no checks at all to see whether a person who submits a registration to vote is or is not a legal resident, let alone a citizen. So, if the world’s Nazis wanted to, they could all send in voter registration requests by mail, falsely claiming to be US citizens...and then vote by absentee ballot. How would you like that, Mr. Holder? How would that affect the civil rights of minorities?


20 posted on 12/30/2011 8:19:59 PM PST by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

Yeah well our governor isn’t gonna take his crap! She plans on taking this all the way to the Supreme Court. Go Nikki!


21 posted on 12/30/2011 8:22:57 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
We have to show an id when we vote in Ohio...but in South Carolina this is considered a violation of Voting Rights Act?

I don’t get it.

The reason you don't get it is that your state, Ohio, is not subject to Article 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. South Carolina, along with 13 other states, is.

As such, any change in voting law is subject to the clearance of the DOJ. And Eric Holder wants the Democrat party to retain the ability to cheat in South Carolina.

That's it...in a nutshell.

22 posted on 12/30/2011 8:28:48 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba
A study by the University of Missouri on turnout in Indiana...In September 2007, The Heritage Foundation released a study...for an administration which is forever spouting off about how much it values science and scientific methods, the Obama group seems to be ignoring the best objective evidence available on the issue in favor of its political argument that requiring photo ID's would hurt minority voting practices - a nonsensical proposition which implies that minorities are too lazy, stupid, or irresponsible to meet the same requirments for obtaining photo ID's that other groups can - minorities should be highly insulted.....
23 posted on 12/30/2011 9:10:53 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

An argument I never hear regarding disenfranchising these voters is that an illegally cast vote disenfranchises MY VOTE. Realistically I’m the disenfranched voter! So I am the one that is penalized by illegal votes. The legal citizens of this country are being screwed royally.


24 posted on 12/30/2011 9:32:09 PM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba
Someone ask HolderIdiot why the DOJ has not stepped in on unions given you have to have an ID to vote in any union held election..... =.=
25 posted on 12/30/2011 9:35:21 PM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I feel that when a fraudulent vote cancels my vote, it is taking away my constitutional right to vote.

I also feel that fraudulent votes are cast in favor of democRATS by huge margins. In fact, 100% of fraudulent votes may be cast in favor of the RATS.


26 posted on 12/30/2011 9:38:10 PM PST by Sam Clements
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
Good point.

BUmp for Others to see!!

27 posted on 12/30/2011 10:09:53 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature ($1.84 - The price of a gallon of gas on Jan. 20th, 2009.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
Most states that have voter ID laws also have a provision for issuing a FREE ID to anyone who can prove that they are US citizens and cannot afford to get any other form of ID.

This is a good thing so Voter ID laws help people.

The big issue is,of course, voter fraud and enabling people who want to vote multiple times or illegal aliens who want to vote one or more times under their multiple fake identities.

Ironically, a woman who sued to overturn one of the States recently passed Voter ID laws because she claimed she was being discriminated against had her case thrown out of court when the Judge had her open her purse in court and found that she had multiple ID cards, all issued before the Voter ID law had been enacted.

28 posted on 12/31/2011 12:14:16 AM PST by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

Sheriff Arpaio needs to arrest Holder and odumbi.


29 posted on 12/31/2011 12:23:46 AM PST by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

There is no irony - they are consistent. They are still pandering to racists.


30 posted on 12/31/2011 12:54:57 AM PST by Eldon Tyrell (question,.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

>>We have to show an id when we vote in Ohio...but in South Carolina this is considered a violation of Voting Rights Act?

I don’t get it.<<

The Confederate States must be punished until the end of time. THAT is what the states being sued need to say: “WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH. No more punishment for the War.”


31 posted on 12/31/2011 1:40:26 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey
The Confederate States must be punished until the end of time.

Not all CSA states (examples, FL, TN, NC, except for some counties) are covered, and some outside the South (Alaska?) are included.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Us_s5_cvr08.PNG

32 posted on 12/31/2011 2:00:22 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba
Overall, he noted, 8.4% of the state's registered white voters lack photo ID, compared to 10% of nonwhite voters.

At which point someone should ask what those percentages equate to in real numbers. It would then be clear that far more whites would be "disenfranchised" than minorities and would show them to be the racist fools they are. In 2010, S. Carolina had 66.2% whites and 27.9% Blacks. That means fully twice as many whites don't have the required ID.

33 posted on 12/31/2011 4:27:23 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

We revisit this same nonsense again and again. Isn’t interesting that the left who would make it possible for as many Americans as possible ( or even not possible) to receive “free” housing,”free” medical, “free”food, and any number of other “free” things can not provide a free ID?
Otherwise,how does this no ID thing work..do you just say, “I do not have a ID but I am going to vote anyhow?”
“No, I do not have a ID but I will be opening an account at your bank none the less?” How about, “No, I do not have a ID but I will be buyiing the car you are selling?”
I can’t get a library card without legal ID or as I found out recently ride the Amtrak train..??? Were my civil rights violated????


34 posted on 12/31/2011 4:31:31 AM PST by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

Getting a voter ID is ‘not convenient’ for minorities who might find the process difficult? But filling out the forms for food stamps is ‘not a problem’!! Do they think we are stupid? (...uh, never mind)


35 posted on 12/31/2011 5:10:59 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

Getting a voter ID is ‘not convenient’ for minorities who might find the process difficult? But filling out the forms for food stamps is ‘not a problem’!! Do they think we are stupid? (...uh, never mind)


36 posted on 12/31/2011 5:11:01 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

Getting a voter ID is ‘not convenient’ for minorities who might find the process difficult? But filling out the forms for food stamps is ‘not a problem’!! Do they think we are stupid? (...uh, never mind)


37 posted on 12/31/2011 5:11:01 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

Anything short of Anonymous Voting is racist./s


38 posted on 12/31/2011 5:24:15 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep; All

This is PROOF POSITIVE they have no intention of ever working, as one could not get any job without ID.


39 posted on 12/31/2011 5:26:21 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Sounds Unconstitutional to me if the same laws are not applied to all 57 States.


40 posted on 12/31/2011 5:28:31 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Let's apply the "reasonable man" standard to gun laws. How many would stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba

Blacks, as a whole, are the most racist people in the country. They are led by the two biggest racists in govt, obozo and holder.


41 posted on 12/31/2011 5:36:05 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.


42 posted on 12/31/2011 5:37:38 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

Obama is such a miserable failure, worse than Carter, that the ONLY way he can win is to steal this election. AG Holder is doing all he can to help. If he succeeds, this will mark the beginning of the end of America and lawlessness will break out all over this nation as those who have had the election stolen from them will NOT be in a mood to accept this blatant assault on our republic. Revolution now!


43 posted on 12/31/2011 5:44:30 AM PST by sgfan1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
I saw a rare case where a MSNBC show actually had a guest on that commented realistically during their daily complain segment about Holder's lawsuit against the SC voter ID law. (It was one of the evening shows.) She actually admitted that Holder's action could backfire politically in the election by making it look like Obama/Democrats are encouraging voter fraud.

Ummm, Obama democrats ARE encouraging voter fraud... Traditionally fraud comes out of black precincts.

44 posted on 12/31/2011 5:49:07 AM PST by GOPJ (Better is a dinner of herbs where love is, Than a fatted calf with hatred - Proverbs 15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sgfan1212

-——lawlessness will break out all over this nation———

The problem is that lawlessness exists now.

There is no law, therefore there can be no lawlessness.

Obama et al have chosen to avoid following the law and merely say it is whatever we say it is.

The breakout and revolution will be law restorative.


45 posted on 12/31/2011 5:58:23 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

I don’t believe you have to show id in Ohio. The Bill didn’t pass. I know there seems to be a lot of confusion about it, and it was often a topic on Ohio talk radio.
http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/07/voter_id_proposal_for_ohio_dea.html


46 posted on 12/31/2011 6:26:34 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba
He doesn't care if it backfires legally, as long as it's too late for the election.

He will stall.

47 posted on 12/31/2011 7:14:14 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba
A couple of FYIs

The KKK started in Indiana and is still strong in some counties.

In Indiana photo ID from state colleges was accepted in last election. IN went for BO. If you look at a map the counties he carried were those around the state universities. Out of state students were registered in the voter registration drives. Hopefully it is corrected this go around.

48 posted on 12/31/2011 7:15:20 AM PST by hoosiermama (We need more Jobs.....Steve Jobs....entrepreneurs and creators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comrade Brother Abu Bubba
Messrs. Obama and Holder are a testament to how much racial progress the country has made..

I disagree.
When a black presidential candidate receives 99 per cent of the black vote, then there has been no progress.

49 posted on 12/31/2011 7:32:42 AM PST by red-dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Mississippi requires voter ID.

Initiative #27 passed by a 63% to 38% margin this past November. It amended the Mississippi Constitution to require voters to submit a government issued photo identification before being allowed to vote; provides that any voter lacking government issued photo identification may obtain photo identification without charge from the Mississippi Department of Public Safety.

50 posted on 12/31/2011 8:39:12 AM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson