Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon to abandon two-war strategy
Christian Science Monitor ^ | January 3, 2012 | Anna Mulrine

Posted on 01/03/2012 8:09:59 PM PST by JerseyanExile

The Pentagon appears to be on the cusp of abandoning a long-held strategic principle: that the US military should have the ability to wage two conventional wars simultaneously.

US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is expected to announce the results of a large-scale strategic overview Thursday that will instead call for the military to be able to fight one large conventional war, and act as a “spoiler” for potential enemies in any other conflict that might crop up.

In the new military parlance, it’s the “one-plus strategy.”

The news is expected to draw a great deal of buzz, but how important is this shift, really? And how will it impact America’s standing in the world? In practical terms, some analysts say that the “shift” has little meaning. In fact it’s less a shift, they argue, than a “no duh” announcement.

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: defense; nationaldefense
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: guitarplayer1953
I did see your tag.

I have no interest in whether you learn the language.

I merely wanted to amuse those who do know the language.

41 posted on 01/03/2012 10:00:20 PM PST by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

“WWII was a defensive war on our part, fought on two fronts. Good thing we won, and there was no guarantee that we would.”

WWII was a completely offensive war on our part; our defenses consisted of 2 oceans, while we built ships & planes that carried the war to the enemies. Britain in 1940 fought a “defensive war”.


42 posted on 01/03/2012 10:02:08 PM PST by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

“They abandoned the two-front capability under Clinton.”

The cuts started towards the end of Bush I, after Gulf War I; I know people who were cut loose who had intended to go career.


43 posted on 01/03/2012 10:06:13 PM PST by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953
Was it not under Queen V that the saying was the sun never set on the British empire? How was England forced to annex a country?

Good questions. They point out the difference between de facto and de jure.

44 posted on 01/03/2012 10:07:43 PM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

WWII was defensive in the sense that it was brought to us. We did not go looking for it.


45 posted on 01/03/2012 10:10:34 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
Why should we want to defend Taiwan anymore? Japan and S. Korea, I understand and say we should -- they are our ally. Taiwan on the other hand FUNDED the rise of mainland China -- they are the biggest investor in the mainland and are increasingly economically integrated.

Also the KMT had the same ideas about subjugating Tibet, the Spratley islands etc. as the chicoms did.

Taiwan had tied itself too close to the mainland -- defending someone from a dragon who raised and fed that dragon is senseless..

Japan and S. Korea we defend, but not Taiwan imho. I'm open to changing my mind if you can explain to me why we should defend them

46 posted on 01/03/2012 10:54:30 PM PST by Cronos (Party like it's 12 20, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan

Actually, when America was still the colonies, George was titled: “George the Third, by the Grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, and so forth, Duke of Brunswick and Lüneburg, Archtreasurer and Prince-Elector of the Holy Roman Empire”


47 posted on 01/03/2012 11:01:56 PM PST by Cronos (Party like it's 12 20, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Thanks for the correction. I didn't know the claim to the throne of France was still being made at the time. You're right about the other titles.
48 posted on 01/03/2012 11:11:27 PM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

send to bill


49 posted on 01/03/2012 11:23:18 PM PST by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

For over 150 years....we basically existed with a one-war strategy. This only changed in the 1950s after re-examining the whole landscape of WW II. The idea that we’d ever go back and repeat a two-war episode is questionable. Even now with Iraq and Afghanistan....we are in a patrol-mode rather than a war-mode....and it’s hard to say if we learned anything relating to two-war strategy from this whole experience.


50 posted on 01/03/2012 11:37:59 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

you are correct — 100% Debt to GDP is the beginning of the end. It is difficult to claw back, considering the huge repayments etc.


51 posted on 01/03/2012 11:44:35 PM PST by Cronos (Party like it's 12 20, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan

no worries, we learn from each other.


52 posted on 01/03/2012 11:51:54 PM PST by Cronos (Party like it's 12 20, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

I see what you mean.


53 posted on 01/04/2012 3:28:00 AM PST by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953

So do you think it right that other countries/systems come to America and seek to force America adopt their way of life? I can name two groups the reconquistadores of The United States of Mexico — and the bloody freakin’ Muslim who believe their system ought be accommodated by our declining power?


54 posted on 01/04/2012 4:55:34 AM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pox

You nailed it. Call the boys back at the Office and request after action report.


55 posted on 01/04/2012 4:57:56 AM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I see you got my point about the importance of being able to fight wars on 2 fronts......


56 posted on 01/04/2012 5:56:51 AM PST by G Larry ("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: StonyBurk
No I don't think they should any more than I think we should have all these bases in other countries. Do you think that is a good idea to have all these bases? If so would you have a problem with those countries setting up military bases here in the USA?
57 posted on 01/04/2012 2:39:43 PM PST by guitarplayer1953 (Grammar & spelling maybe wrong, get over it, the world will not come to an end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks grey_whiskers.

The key to fighting more than one war (without a draft) is to make it quick, using overwhelming superiority of firepower.

Of course, Zero’s only war is against the US, so there’s no need to fight more than one at a time.


58 posted on 01/04/2012 6:50:56 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Merry Christmas, Happy New Year! May 2013 be even Happier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953

Bout as much problem as I have with other countries now doing flyovers over America.Oh they pay us so they can get flight time— but they also get real time experience that might prove necessary in the future. I do not believe we have military bases in any country that has NOT invited us.I would prefer we
regroup to reclaim that ideal set by George Washington about avoiding all foreign entanglements as much as possible” but some of them bases you refer to do serve strategic purpose as intel and restraint .


59 posted on 01/05/2012 4:02:40 AM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953

Bout as much problem as I have with other countries now doing flyovers over America.Oh they pay us so they can get flight time— but they also get real time experience that might prove necessary in the future. I do not believe we have military bases in any country that has NOT invited us.I would prefer we
regroup to reclaim that ideal set by George Washington about avoiding all foreign entanglements as much as possible” but some of them bases you refer to do serve strategic purpose as intel and restraint .


60 posted on 01/05/2012 4:03:05 AM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson