Posted on 01/07/2012 8:18:48 AM PST by RetSignman
This just a mild analogy compared to what we can expect from Obama if we pick Romney as our candidate.
why?? obama hasn’t benefited from Wall Street??? the problem is no one in the GOP has the courage to man up and call out obozo for his utter and complete hypocrisy on just about every issue- starting with “wall street greed”....
This election is looking more and more like one from the old Soviet Union - two candidates from the same party, pick the one you think is prettier. :)
Exactly.
page 16:
bY CONTRAST, mASSACHUSETTS IN 2006 SUCCESSFULLY PAIRED INSURANCE MARKET REFORMS WITH A PROVISION REQUIRING INDIVIDUALS TO PAY A TAX PENALTY IF THEY DO NOT “OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN CREDITABLE COVERAGE.” mASS. aNN. lAWS CH. 111m, § 2 (lEXISnEXIS sUPP. 2011). ¢ONGRESS CITED THE mASSACHUSETTS LAW AS A TEMPLATE FOR KEY PROVISIONS OF THE aFFORDABLE ¢ARE aCT, INCLUDING THE MINIMUM COVERAGE PROVISION. sEE 42 U.s.¢.a. 18091(A)(2)(d).
and again, on page 30:
iN CONTRAST, ¢ONGRESS FOUND THAT mASSACHUSETTS AVOIDED THESE PERILS BY ENACTING A MINIMUM COVERAGE PROVISION AS PART OF BROADER INSURANCE REFORMS. tHAT mASSACHUSETTS LAW “HAS STRENGTHENED PRIVATE EMPLOYER-BASED COVERAGE: DESPITE THE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN, THE NUMBER OF WORKERS OFFERED EMPLOYER-BASED COVERAGE HAS ACTUALLY INCREASED.”
and, if that is not enough, on page 41a:
(d) tHE REQUIREMENT ACHIEVES NEAR-UNIVERSAL COVERAGE BY BUILDING UPON AND STRENGTHENING THE PRIVATE EMPLOYER-BASED HEALTH INSURANCE SYSTEM, WHICH COVERS 176,000,000 aMERICANS NATIONWIDE. iN mASSACHUSETTS, A SIMILAR REQUIREMENT HAS STRENGTHENED PRIVATE EMPLOYER-BASED COVERAGE: DESPITE THE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN, THE NUMBER OF WORKERS OFFERED EMPLOYER-BASED COVERAGE HAS ACTUALLY INCREASED.
Democrats will not vote for him!
They are not stupid twice.
Newt has the courage we need.
McCain was the weakest Republican in history.
He even campaigned for Obama on October 10, 2010.
Romney made Newt cry.
He will make Obama load his pants!
That's a joke? Right?
Romney is Karl Rove, with John Edwards’ hair.
Romney blows.
Mitt will paint Obama as the Wall street guy first.
What I am finding out the most so far in this campaign is Mitt knows how to win the dirt fight.Look what he did to Newt.
Mitt also the only one to be able to keep up with Obama dollar for dollar.
Mitt not my first choice.
Democrats are consistently stupid. They are stuck on stupid. They will vote for Zero.
And there are a lot of skeletons in Mitt’s proverbial closet that will cost him an election.
If we want to save this country (or at least have hope of it), then we need to make sure MITT is not the nominee.
There is one...
The Democrats will attack his religion.
Obama had no record to speak of the first goround. His record of failures,and his ignorance and contempt of the constitution will be his destruction no matter who the republican nominee is.
Romney is not afraid to do what it takes to win!
Romney made Newt cry.
He will make Obama load his pants!
- - - - - -
Did you forget your /sarc tag?
Romney is not afraid to cheat to win.
And FWIW, this is not a Romney friendly site, so I am wondering why you are supporting Romney.
Do you think Romney is a conservative?
Oh goody, another Romney bot for the kitties to play with!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.