Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. HS student devises possible cancer cure
CBS News ^ | 1/13/12 | Steve Hartman .

Posted on 01/13/2012 5:23:41 PM PST by Brandonmark

If you ever worry about the future of America, there is no need: it is in good hands. A high school student named Angela is proof of that. We think you'll agree she is nothing short of amazing. CBS News correspondent Steve Hartman met her on the road.

Born to Chinese immigrants, 17-year-old Angela Zhang of Cupertino, California is a typical American teenager. She's really into shoes and is just learning how to drive.

But there is one thing that separates her from every other student at Monta Vista High School, something she first shared with her chemistry teacher, Kavita Gupta.

It's a research paper Angela wrote in her spare time -- and it is advanced, to say the least. Gupta says all she knows is its recipe -- for curing cancer.

"Cure for cancer -- a high school student," said Gupta. "It's just so mind-boggling. I just cannot even begin to comprehend how she even thought about it or did this."

"I just thought, 'Why not?' 'What is there to lose?'" said Angela.

When she was a freshman, she started reading doctorate level papers on bio-engineering.

"At first it was a little bit overwhelming," said Angela, "but I found that it almost became like a puzzle, being able to decode something."

By sophomore year she'd talked her way into the lab at Stanford, and by junior year was doing her own research.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cancer; cancercure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Brandonmark

I know it’s cynical, but I expect 2 or 3 weeks we’ll rad she’s being sud by the AMA, facing charges by California by a whole slew of charges from Practicing Medicine without a License to Animal cruelty, and the IRS is auditing her and family.


21 posted on 01/13/2012 5:53:41 PM PST by theDentist (FYBO/FUBO; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

I guess it’s a good thing she wasn’t aborted.


22 posted on 01/13/2012 5:53:41 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

If you want more of an item, subsidize it. Our government has been doing that for 50 years.


23 posted on 01/13/2012 5:54:51 PM PST by listenhillary (Look your representatives in the eye and ask if they intend to pay off the debt. They will look away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
This can’t be. She attends one of those crappy public high schools and we are told they are all worthless. /S

They are, but she isn't.

24 posted on 01/13/2012 5:55:41 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Billions.
25 posted on 01/13/2012 5:56:18 PM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Meanwhile, at the science fair:

You made a stupid lemon clock...I CURED CANCER!!!


26 posted on 01/13/2012 5:56:19 PM PST by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

It’ll take years to know if it works in humans — but in mice — the tumors almost completely disappeared.

Wonder how many people will suffer an agonizing death while we wait on the FDA to determine if this approach is “safe” to use on humans.


27 posted on 01/13/2012 6:01:42 PM PST by phoneman08 (Reagan conservative union member. Not a s rare as you think!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

28 posted on 01/13/2012 6:02:03 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters

Wowser. Best of luck and much success in all your endeavors, Angela! God speed.


29 posted on 01/13/2012 6:16:26 PM PST by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

they will fight her because they make so much more when there isn’t a cure..........


30 posted on 01/13/2012 6:21:34 PM PST by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

The cancer treatment with micro particle that release cancer drug in cancer cell only is in current practice . Mr. Rudy Giuliani has been treated in that way for his prostate cancer at the beginning of his campaign for the US senator from NY(Hillary was his opponent).


31 posted on 01/13/2012 6:27:13 PM PST by cambyses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

The answers to the most difficult questions can be found in the most unlikely of places.


32 posted on 01/13/2012 6:31:51 PM PST by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

A great accomplishment for someone her age regardless. Her idea is similar to that developed by another audodidact, John Kanzius, who came up with the idea of delivering metallic nanoparticles rather than cancer drugs directly to tumor sites, and then using RF energy to destroy them without damaging nearby tissues. His method is now going into clinical testing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanzius_RF_Therapy

Brilliant minds don’t need massive governmental programs, they just need the freedom to explore and create.


33 posted on 01/13/2012 6:33:10 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark
"Angela's idea was to mix cancer medicine in a polymer that would attach to nanoparticles -- nanoparticles that would then attach to cancer cells and show up on an MRI so doctors could see exactly where the tumors are. Then she thought that if you aimed an infrared light at the tumors to melt the polymer and release the medicine, thus killing the cancer cells while leaving healthy cells completely unharmed.

"I think it was more of a -- 'This is really cool, I want to see if it works' -- type thing," she said.

"And when you found out it did..." asked Hartman.

"That was pretty amazing."

It'll take years to know if it works in humans -- but in mice -- the tumors almost completely disappeared."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, that seals it. This cancer treatment will never see the light of day. Wouldn't want to endanger all those billions in cancer research grants, or inhibit the sickness industry in any way.

Priorities, you know...

34 posted on 01/13/2012 6:37:49 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

I don’t know what the chemicals are, but I sure how the reaction doesn’t release any CO2 particles... California will immediately tag it with a per-molecule cap and trade carbon tax


35 posted on 01/13/2012 6:49:50 PM PST by FunkyZero (... I've got a Grand Piano to prop up my mortal remains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

“”The problem is all the powerful, vested interests who want to keep things just the way they are.””

Including finding a cure for cancer. Does anyone really believe this student found something that billions of dollars of research hasn’t found? It’s been found all right but will never reach the market.


36 posted on 01/13/2012 6:57:06 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark
Angela's idea was to mix cancer medicine in a polymer that would attach to nanoparticles -- nanoparticles that would then attach to cancer cells and show up on an MRI. so doctors could see exactly where the tumors are. Then she thought shat if you aimed an infrared light at the tumors to melt the polymer and release the medicine, thus killing the cancer cells while leaving healthy cells completely unharmed.

Is this science fact? (I seriously don't know)

Are there "nanoparticles" that can differentiate between healthy cells and cancer cells and attach themselves?

The way I'm reading this...that science/capability exists and Angela's idea is the addition of the melt-able, medicated polymer to the existing, cancer-cell-attaching-nanoparticles.

If the cancer-cell-attaching-nanoparticles don't currently exist (or are not know to be possible) then isn't this just a "wouldn't it be cool if..." story?

37 posted on 01/13/2012 6:58:59 PM PST by Washi (Surviving the Zombie Apocalypse, one head-shot at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

I hope no one steals her work. She probably doesn’t even worry about that.


38 posted on 01/13/2012 7:13:50 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark
Angela's idea was to mix cancer medicine in a polymer that would attach to nanoparticles -- nanoparticles that would then attach to cancer cells and show up on an MRI. so doctors could see exactly where the tumors are. Then she thought shat if you aimed an infrared light at the tumors to melt the polymer and release the medicine, thus killing the cancer cells while leaving healthy cells completely unharmed.

I believe that Pyramid Diagnostics labs was doing something similar back in the late 80s, early 90s, but were using radioactive isotopes, rather than anti-cancer meds.

The only reason I'm aware of this is that I helped install the network at one of their locations, I believe in TN, but it's been so long I really can't recall. It was weird hearing a gieger counter clicking all the time, and the lab employees REALLY freaked when I threw a printer test page in the trash. Turns out it was marked with the radioactive symbol, and the Dept of Energy seemed to frown on that sort of thing... Nothing was actually radioactive, it's just the paper was marked with the warning symbol.

Mark

39 posted on 01/13/2012 7:14:57 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Sedition

how do the nanoparticles know which cells are cancerous to attach to?


40 posted on 01/13/2012 7:22:01 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson