To: DeaconBenjamin
Sweden did this to protect itself and its people from attack by slavers.
2 posted on
01/15/2012 8:53:05 PM PST by
SatinDoll
(NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
To: DeaconBenjamin
I’m confused. The concubines taken to the ottomans were negros? I thought they only took fair skinned concubines?
To: WesternCulture
Wow, the Swedes have been kowtowing to their Muslim overlords even longer than I thought.
To: DeaconBenjamin; SunkenCiv
An ugly fact.
They owe us money for dropping people offf here.
To: DeaconBenjamin
Makes me even prouder that the US did not pay tribute on the “shores of Tripoli”.
7 posted on
01/15/2012 9:20:45 PM PST by
married21
(As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
To: DeaconBenjamin
8 posted on
01/15/2012 9:23:36 PM PST by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: DeaconBenjamin
How come nobody's blaming the Muslims (Ottoman Empire, Tripoli) in all this?
Cheers!
9 posted on
01/15/2012 9:25:29 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: DeaconBenjamin; mickie
Isn't it high time for the Swedes to pay retribution money to blacks in their own country and others?
Is there a Swedish Al Sharpton to be the middleman?
Leni
To: DeaconBenjamin
Not new. The Vikings sold Slavs as slaves to the Abbasid Caliphate.
19 posted on
01/16/2012 1:43:51 PM PST by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson