Posted on 01/17/2012 10:23:55 PM PST by Sprite518
Wall Street Journal editorial board director Stephen Moore explains why Rep. Ron Pauls ideas on economics are correct and must be accepted in the mainstream GOP platform.
(Excerpt) Read more at video.foxbusiness.com ...
Here is the link,
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1398360552001/how-about-a-0-income-tax/?playlist_id=87185
I think he may be a tad off.
Replaced with what?
Probably a sales tax which would be even worse.
The only way out of this mess is for the government to earn its keep through voluntary donations. Nobody thinks the government knows how to spend money effectively so that’s why it has to force people.
There was no income tax in our Republic until 1913. So we went 140 years without an income tax. The Feds some how managed to get by.
Ron Paul wants to
1) Gradually abolish the income tax.
2) Shrink the government down to it’s Constitutional Size
3) Force it to go to other resources for cast.
There was no income tax in our Republic until 1913. So we went 140 years without an income tax. The Feds some how managed to get by.
Ron Paul wants to
1) Gradually abolish the income tax.
2) Shrink the government down to it’s Constitutional Size
3) Force it to go to other resources for cast.
And you are referring to Ron Paul, or Steve Moore?
And I am pretty sick of FNC
I totally agree on Ron Paul, but not for his financial opinions, just his foreign policy notions. But the chief editor of the WSJ?
Their pimping for Mitt is sickening to the extreme.
Ive’d
laughed at Perry’s 20% flat tax and “999”
But this other stuff is crazy.
Flat out crazy.
So even though there was no income tax in our Republic until 1913 that’s crazy???
We went 140 years without an income tax. The Feds some how managed to get by.
Ron Paul wants to
1) Gradually abolish the income tax.
2) Shrink the government down to its Constitutional Size
3) Force it to go to other resources for cash.
Napolitano has way to much hair jelly.
The balance sheet is a wreck.
I agree with scaling it back but I to not agree with Wrong Paul.
I’m for that, and I’m also for no federal government whatsoever, but I’m not for Ron paul.
That’s cool, but it should be on the GOP platform.
Government expenses would be paid by money "printed" by the Fed.
All prices and wages would be index to compensate for the resulting inflation.
This idea was gaining currency (pun) today among the Paultards at ZeroHedge.
You need to ask how prior to 1913 the Fed was able to get by.
Tariffs. AKA VAT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.