Posted on 01/18/2012 1:04:45 PM PST by chopperman
I think LA should let them alone. I don't want them moving here.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Unless production values have changed over the last 10 years, the adult film industry is the very model of "highly mobile".
And of course, the politically incorrect fact we can't mention is that virtually all of the HIV scares in the adult film industry in the last several years (at least ones that have made the news) have stemmed from male performers who were also involved in homosexual sex. But musn't mention that ...
TSA agents called the Dick Squad
Porn film owners are democrats. Maybe they should apply for some stimulus funding to help their deflated industry?
“Hi! What do you do for a living? ... What’s a prophylactic device inspector? ... Oh, uh, see ya ...”
Face it, under Obama we're all getting screwed ... one way or another.
I had no idea they were Catholic. /S
Viagra???
It would be easy. You can see in the videos if the law is being obeyed. If it's not, the name of the production company is on the video.
Watch a bunch of cities and states vie for them with tax breaks and so forth...
I'm sure you would find yourself in some sticky situations.
At least all the lesbian actors can fall back on their carpentry skills.
Somebody has to make these hard decisions no matter how much it sucks....
This being California, I'm sure they'll lay off some more cops and firefighters and close some more public libraries to come up with the funding to hire condom inspectors.
Clinton's Communications Decency Act tried to do just that and was shot down by a unanimous Supreme Court.
With no real people involved, you're advocating absolute control over individual's freedom of expression.
Why would they need permits to film inside a home or privately owned building?
I’m sure sexually-deviant San Fransicko will welcome them
Sorry about that. I don’t start threads often. I thought it was going to add the first 100 words automatically. I did give a link.
—Why is that scary? What is wrong with you? —
I don’t know that anything is wrong with me, beyond the normal stuff (the doctor says I may get out in a few months) Regarding the scary part:
It means that child pornographers can profit, and are therefor incented, by making CGI child pr0n. Sure, maybe no children are exploited in the actual making of the film, but unless you are one of those who advocates that pr0n “releases” the desires that would otherwise well up to cause you to attack real people, it means those who purchase and download this stuff will get the same dosage of the material they get with the “real” and illegal stuff.
And the fact that it is made illegal by the fact that real children are used currently is only part of why it was made illegal, but enough to nip it in the bud. The advent of CGI bypasses the laws and allows the product to be freely sold.
And it is believed by many that pr0n only increases the problem for its customers.
That’s why it’s “scary”.
“Hi! What do you do for a living? ... What’s a prophylactic device inspector? ... Oh, uh, see ya ...”
See the government IS creating jobs. </sarc>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.