Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter Throws a Temper Tantrum (BARF ALERT)
Fox News | 01/22/2012 | Me

Posted on 01/22/2012 6:45:03 AM PST by stratboy

Ann Coulter was just on Fox and Friends. She was crying over the fact that Romney got decimated in South Carolina. She offered a few talking points from the Romney camp including:

1. Newt is the lease conservative of all Candidates running. 2. Newt is unelectable because of his failed marriages. 3. The Freddy Mac non-issue. 4. John K asked a legitimate question and he is a completely fair and honorable reporter. 5. South Carolina is going back to it democratic roots and backing someone who calls Obama a socialist.

She laid out the establishment talking point that everyone who voted for McCain, will vote for Romney, that we need to get the independents.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; coulter; coulter4romney; faghag; mittbait; offherrocker; personanongrata; pleaseeatsomething; rinoann; romneybotzot; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-295 last
To: wayoverontheright

BTTT

In case you missed this wonderful post here it is for your enjoyment. Clue: ROAR!!!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2836187/posts


251 posted on 01/22/2012 11:32:54 PM PST by Chgogal (WSJ, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et. al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; DarthVader
wow...and you had been here since 1998?
did you not get the memo or were you some sorta 1950s era soviet style sleeper?


That was my thought as well, although the possibility of early dementia was also suspect, the odd thing about this zotting is that there are apparently three posters in this thread (you can figure out who they are) who took great umbrage at the fact that JimRob and the mods were pinged to what certainly appears to be a sleeper troll, and obviously agreed, resulting in the *ZOT*, the unnamed posters sneering at the FReeper in question (in this case it was DarthVader), calling him a (ready for this schoolyard taunt?) "tattle tale", I pointed out that the Zot validated their pinging JR & the Mods, they then proceeded to spew their bile in my direction.

I believe we are seeing a strange new phenomenon here on FR, the emergence of a 'troll defender' class of dirtbag, who deserve zotting just as much as the offending troll in question, i.e., a variation on "the enemy of my enemy is my friend", for this purpose "the friend (or defender) of the troll, is also a troll".
252 posted on 01/23/2012 3:56:41 AM PST by mkjessup (I support the *NEWTerizer* - the only candidate who WILL Kick 0bama's AZZ!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop; JudyM; DarthVader; 50mm; Arrowhead1952; Jim Thompson; darkwing104; stephenjohnbanker; ...


So long, pinetop (Posting History)  and  JudyM (Posting History)

Hat Tip to Darth Vader, 50mm, Arrowhead1952, and Jim

Mythens fans Double ZOT of the Morning!


 


What part of Jim Robinson's "Keep that stinkin' Mitt Romney off my site!" don't you understand?


Thank you JoeProBono

FReepmail TheOldLady to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.

253 posted on 01/23/2012 5:35:00 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Rate_Determining_Step
Excellent post, because I agree 100% with everything you typed. :)

Glad to see the great Phil Gramm's name mentioned, too. Without him we'd now be living under Hillarycare.

254 posted on 01/23/2012 7:34:25 AM PST by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady
Did Jim give a directive that no Romney support is to be expressed on the site?

I haven't been that active recently and didn't see that.

Thanks.

255 posted on 01/23/2012 7:37:44 AM PST by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

I think Romney is our best chance this time around, but I am eager to defer to Jim’s wishes. It’s his site and I have huge respect for him.


256 posted on 01/23/2012 7:40:19 AM PST by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
4. John K asked a legitimate question and he is a completely fair and honorable reporter.

Gingrich has figured out something pundits like Coulter and others refuse to see. The media are the enemy of Republicans and even more so,conservatives.

257 posted on 01/23/2012 7:52:45 AM PST by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Ann Coulter needs a stint or two in rehab.


258 posted on 01/23/2012 7:55:46 AM PST by GOPsterinMA (Farewell sweet Rick, we barely knew ye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; lonestar; DarthVader; ladyvet

mkjessup

Just to set the record straight...my vote is going to Newt. I don’t like Romney, Ann Coulter, trolls or crybabies such as yourself. For all the tears, you must be an “only” child.

My suggestion? Snug up your diaper tightly before running off across the playground to report someone to the teacher.


259 posted on 01/23/2012 7:55:47 AM PST by moovova (Report my sarcastic, fear-mongering, hate-filled lies to www.AttackWatch.com by clicking HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: stratboy
1. Newt is the lease conservative of all Candidates running.

Unless you count that whole RomneyCare thing.

True, Newt espoused a single payer system but at least he didn't ramrod it through when he had the chance.

260 posted on 01/23/2012 7:56:12 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moovova; lonestar; ladyvet; DarthVader
mkjessup
Just to set the record straight...my vote is going to Newt. I don’t like Romney, Ann Coulter, trolls or crybabies such as yourself. For all the tears, you must be an “only” child.


In that case, lil moo moo, that begs the question as to why you chose to align yourself with troll defenders who took offense to DV alerting the mods to the dearly departed 'Pinetop'.

My suggestion? Snug up your diaper tightly before running off across the playground to report someone to the teacher.


Your puerile 'suggestion' has been forwarded to DarthVader who is no doubt keeping notes on all of you losers.
261 posted on 01/23/2012 8:20:29 AM PST by mkjessup (I support the *NEWTerizer* - the only candidate who WILL Kick 0bama's AZZ!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: billys kid

OK. You’re entitled. Just get over yourself.


262 posted on 01/23/2012 8:26:29 AM PST by Nathaniel (- A Man Without A Cross -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Ann is on the Mike Gallagher show right now. First she said it’s the end of the world meaning Newt’s win, then she compares Christie to Reagan. She needs to take her shrill skinny ass and stfu especially when she herself blasted Romney last time around.
What about Romneycare Ann?

We need to stick together right now and attack Obama.


263 posted on 01/23/2012 8:30:09 AM PST by bluerose (Newt Gingrich and Col. Allen West for VP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

I agree. King is liberal scum. However, Newt is a Pelosi pal. I did not say that I didn’t admire the way King got his a** handed to him - and justifyably so. What I’m saying is that Romney is enough of a RINO that the dims are more comdortable with him. Having said that, I will vote for ANYBODY to get rid of the Muslim in chief, including Charles Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer.


264 posted on 01/23/2012 8:30:50 AM PST by Nathaniel (- A Man Without A Cross -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

I agree. King is liberal scum. However, Newt is a Pelosi pal. I did not say that I didn’t admire the way King got his a** handed to him - and justifyably so. What I’m saying is that Romney is enough of a RINO that the dims are more comfortable with him. Having said that, I will vote for ANYBODY to get rid of the Muslim in chief, including Charles Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer.


265 posted on 01/23/2012 8:31:49 AM PST by Nathaniel (- A Man Without A Cross -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; moovova; lonestar; ladyvet; DarthVader
First of all nobody was defending anyone. Your feeling seem to be hurt because what we did do was make fun of you because you ARE a tattle tale,LOL!

Your puerile 'suggestion' has been forwarded to DarthVader who is no doubt keeping notes on all of you losers.

All kidding aside Sport... this is kind of creepy.

266 posted on 01/23/2012 8:32:10 AM PST by ladyvet ( I would rather have Incitatus then the asses that are in congress today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: bluerose

Oh we’ll attack 0bama, believe that but first we need to attack and utterly destroy Romney and eliminate that dirtbag from any possibility of becoming the GOP nomineee. To do that, we need to rally around Newt who is the only candidate with the intelligence, cajones and skill to torpedo the Mitt-Witt.


267 posted on 01/23/2012 8:32:39 AM PST by mkjessup (I support the *NEWTerizer* - the only candidate who WILL Kick 0bama's AZZ!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: anoldafvet

I do not NEED to and will NOT “get back to me [you]”. I dislike Romney intensely. As much as I have differences with the Mormons, conservatives will play directly into the lib-dims’ hands if religion is made THE issue here. Having said that, ANYBODY but B. HUSSEIN Obammay.


268 posted on 01/23/2012 8:36:27 AM PST by Nathaniel (- A Man Without A Cross -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ladyvet; DarthVader; 50mm; darkwing104
First of all nobody was defending anyone.

Of course you were. You were defending the dead troll 'Pinetop' by your attacking Darth Vader as the "tattle tale", I pointed out that the zotting of Pinetop validated DV's going to the mods, and you didn't like that. That looks like a case of projection in that YOUR "feelings were hurt"

Your feeling seem to be hurt because what we did do was make fun of you because you ARE a tattle tale,LOL!

You can't even keep track of your lies. I never went to the mods in this thread, DV did and rightly so.

Your puerile 'suggestion' has been forwarded to DarthVader who is no doubt keeping notes on all of you losers.
All kidding aside Sport... this is kind of creepy.


The scent of ozone in the air can make you feel that way.
269 posted on 01/23/2012 8:39:04 AM PST by mkjessup (I support the *NEWTerizer* - the only candidate who WILL Kick 0bama's AZZ!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; lonestar; ladyvet; DarthVader
...keeping notes...

Go away, freak.

270 posted on 01/23/2012 8:46:12 AM PST by moovova (Report my sarcastic, fear-mongering, hate-filled lies to www.AttackWatch.com by clicking HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: moovova

Shove it punk.


271 posted on 01/23/2012 8:46:53 AM PST by mkjessup (I support the *NEWTerizer* - the only candidate who WILL Kick 0bama's AZZ!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
To: ladyvet; DarthVader; 50mm; darkwing104

Look! Your tattling again! LOL!

272 posted on 01/23/2012 8:53:21 AM PST by ladyvet ( I would rather have Incitatus then the asses that are in congress today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: ladyvet

I’ll ping anyone I please, and you got nothing to say about it. You’re no lady, that’s for sure.


273 posted on 01/23/2012 9:00:56 AM PST by mkjessup (I support the *NEWTerizer* - the only candidate who WILL Kick 0bama's AZZ!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
LOL! See ya skipper. This is just getting too weird for me.
274 posted on 01/23/2012 9:09:43 AM PST by ladyvet ( I would rather have Incitatus then the asses that are in congress today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: ladyvet

You’re just zot-bait that hasn’t ripened yet. Adios babycakes.


275 posted on 01/23/2012 9:11:35 AM PST by mkjessup (I support the *NEWTerizer* - the only candidate who WILL Kick 0bama's AZZ!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

book mark


276 posted on 01/23/2012 10:19:42 AM PST by Marcella (Newt will smash Hussein in debates. Newt needs money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider
Yes, Mitt is not running on this site.

You were, unfortunately, easily misled into discussing how he might win.

Frankly, the guy is unelectable. Discussion of his virtues, if any, should be deferred to the time when he might become electable.

277 posted on 01/23/2012 12:46:49 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider
Jim has principled, well-thought-out reasons for not supporting Romney and for not allowing his trolls to come here and campaign for him.

Romney's record is one that is virtually indistinguishable from a radical leftist democrat's. He is pro abortion, pro homosexual, and anti gun, to name just a few problems with his actions. His Romneycare provided the Obama administration with a template for Obamacare, the unconstitutional socialized medicine scheme designed to break the back of our healthcare system.

He talks the talk, but after he's elected, he walks hard left and "forgets" all his campaign rhetoric. Speaking plainly, he's a filthy liar, and to be trusted at about the same level as Obama, who is incapable of telling the truth about anything, ever.

Anyone who blatantly pimps for Romney will lose his posting privileges (get zotted), for why, with his record, would anyone but a leftist want him to be the president?

I hope that helps.
278 posted on 01/23/2012 3:18:25 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

I don’t know how to respond further. Should I just shut up and stay in my place?

You have all but stated that you cannot be convinced that your position isn’t the right one.

Tell me, if (IF) Romney got the nomination, would you vote for him?

They could dig up Mark Hatfield if he won the nomination, I’d crawl over broken glass to vote for him or ANYBODY. If that’s what it took to rid ourselves of Obama.

Clearly, with both men, there are many issues which have been “changed”, “clarified” and basically flip-flopped over the years. They are both (usually) saying the right things now.

However, who transgressed under little or no pressure? Remember, Gingrich came from a longstanding Red State and Romney from a Blue. He was under no pressure what-so-ever to “temper” his views. They just came from his fertile mind. As well, they’re more recent.

So how can we judge a man? What other character attributes can one draw on? For me, it’s his marriage vows which are the most apparent. Is there a better indicator of one’s integrity? I can’t think of one.

With that in mind, my choice was easy. Even though I’d love to see Newt pinch hit in one (ok all) debates with Obama.

On a range of important issues (2nd am, life, immigration, etc.) one WILL BE the #1 issue regardless of what I or anybody else cares about. The economy. We’re at a Europe-level tipping point here. And News loses those credentials flat. He shows as much deference to capitalism as your average democrat - “Vulture Capitalism” (Really!?)

With that kind of mindset, if he wins the nomination, the argument will between two experts who distrust the American people to freely conduct business with each other.

The socialism vs liberty clash is the battle that comes over the hill at dawn. That battle MUST be won.


279 posted on 01/23/2012 6:17:29 PM PST by Rate_Determining_Step (We got the socialism, how come we at least don't get the good cars from Europe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Would you call this http://thehill.com/video/campaign/203497-romney-likens-work-at-bain-to-obamas-auto-industry-bailout the proper defense of capitalism????????
No, I don't. It was clearly a poorly thought out attempt to explain his cost cutting activities at Bain.

It looks like you're equating their positions on capitalism. Would I be correct?

280 posted on 01/23/2012 7:00:11 PM PST by Rate_Determining_Step (We got the socialism, how come we at least don't get the good cars from Europe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Rate_Determining_Step
I'm sorry, I don't understand why you're talking to me. I answered a direct question from another FReeper, and neither the question nor the answer was addressed to you.

I am ordering neither the other person nor you to do or say anything, for I was merely stating the facts as I see them here. You are certainly free to state your opinion about anything at all and to vote for whomever you choose.

A good way to evaluate a candidate is by his record. If his rhetoric matches his record, we have a winner. However if the campaign speeches are forgotten after election day, then we have a sleazy political animal.

As far as a candidate's personal life goes, sometimes it is best to temper what one hears in the Mainly Slime Media with what the candidate says about the situation. the leftist media do tend to scandalize everything about a conservative and nothing about a liberal. I take everything they say with a grain of salt, and I certainly do not parrot their talking points about conservative candidates without hearing the conservative's side of the issue, a side that would weigh heavier in my mind than the MSM's version.

You are correct. The battle must be won.
281 posted on 01/23/2012 7:22:07 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady
It looks like I misunderstood what I was reading. I understand Jim was/is pretty adamant in his support for Gingrich. I thought you were spelling out the rules backed by the authority to remove posting privileges.
A good way to evaluate a candidate is by his record. If his rhetoric matches his record, we have a winner. However if the campaign speeches are forgotten after election day, then we have a sleazy political animal.
This doesn't sound unreasonable.

As far as a candidate's personal life goes, sometimes it is best to temper what one hears in the Mainly Slime Media with what the candidate says about the situation...
I'm not bringing up the that "wife on deathbed" false story. Nor, am I bringing up that 2nd wife "open marriage" thing.

However, far from ending two marriage and starting three serially, he ran them in parallel. A kind way of saying his marriage vows meant little when presented with something he wanted. I'm no prude, but I just find that behavior distasteful and a real indicator of what makes someone tick.

This decision isn't easy as both have many more policy transgressions than I care to see. So that's why his infidelity is tipping the scales for me as an indicator of his truthfulness. I supported Cain and was furious with him when he pulled the same stunt. My first choice was Pawlenty... the first guy to throw in the towel...

282 posted on 01/23/2012 8:08:19 PM PST by Rate_Determining_Step (We got the socialism, how come we at least don't get the good cars from Europe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Rate_Determining_Step
No, I don't. It was clearly a poorly thought out attempt to explain his cost cutting activities at Bain. It looks like you're equating their positions on capitalism. Would I be correct?

poorly thought out????? Nah, it was a shallow attempt to preempt for the general election, the liberals 'occupy wall street' show.

Who is this 'their' positions? Actually it is quite stunning for any conservative candidate to be promoting their candidacy as the 'ends justify the means'.

283 posted on 01/23/2012 9:06:22 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Rate_Determining_Step
LOL! NO! I can't zot anybody. I just do the after-action reports and know the rules.

Sometimes with age comes wisdom, and even a two-time loser is able to see the destruction that his bad choices have caused. [coughRushLimbaughcough]

I did some bone-headed stuff (that did not involve cheating on my dear Hubby of 32 years) when I was a bit younger, the memory of which absolutely appalls me, and I know better than to pull such stunts now. I'd like to think that a man as brilliant as Speaker Gingrich could figure out the same thing at his age.
284 posted on 01/24/2012 3:01:19 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
poorly thought out????? Nah, it was a shallow attempt to preempt for the general election, the liberals 'occupy wall street' show.
Could you explain that further?

He was equating Govt Motors and the cost cutting they did with general business cost cutting such as what happened at Bain.

Maybe we are seeing two different videos?

285 posted on 01/24/2012 6:39:10 AM PST by Rate_Determining_Step (We got the socialism, how come we at least don't get the good cars from Europe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I'm still unclear. Jim doesn't want any comments supporting Romney on this site?

That's his prerogative, and I'll respect it if that's what he wants, though I disagree.

I don't think I was misled, easily or otherwise.

286 posted on 01/24/2012 7:23:56 AM PST by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady
Thank you for taking the time to respond at length.

I'll gladly respect anything Jim wishes. I'm not sure, though, what constitutes "pimping".

I do think that Romney would be infinitely preferable to Obama. So I'd vote for him. I also think Newt can't get the independents he needs to win.

I guess its not safe to elaborate, or the kittehs will come for me. For the record, I don't think my opinions make me a troll, a leftist, or a bad person.

287 posted on 01/24/2012 7:38:34 AM PST by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: mardi59
Everytime I see Ann on tv I look for her Adams apple. She seems very masculine to me.

Sadly, you're not alone here in making that kind of remark.

Disagree with Ann Coulter all you like. I often do, though not in this case.

Hurling ugly personal insults at people you disagree with is expected at Democratic Underground. We should be better than that.

288 posted on 01/24/2012 8:07:53 AM PST by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rate_Determining_Step
Could you explain that further? He was equating Govt Motors and the cost cutting they did with general business cost cutting such as what happened at Bain. Maybe we are seeing two different videos?

I think the liberals plot for having 'occupy wall street' was done to activate a national uprising against the supposed 'evil' rich Republicans, namely Romney. As long as I have been watching the political games, liberals always accused that 'corporate' welfare is how Republicans get rich.

I think rather than Romney refute them, he attempted to liken his personal gains as same as Obama using US taxpayers to bail out the auto industry. My objection is that by using this analogy, Romney ignores that what Obama did was not conservative. Notice I have not uttered any negative about Romney's stored up wealth, but that he can hardly get his undies in a wad if any conservative questions his business practices. Because he himself has already questioned his own business practices. We the people, 'government', have NO business bailing out private businesses, else it is NOT free enterprise.

289 posted on 01/24/2012 9:35:41 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: anoldafvet

I think Romley wants to get up in there to finish the job of destroying traditional marriage so he and his LDS friends can go back to openly “living the principle.”


290 posted on 01/24/2012 11:29:48 AM PST by ichabod1 (Mr. Gingrich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
I think I know what Ann's problem is -- she just turned the big 5-0 on Dec 9th.

Wanna know how a woman disappears?

She turns 50.

291 posted on 01/24/2012 11:33:07 AM PST by ichabod1 (Mr. Gingrich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

There was a guy on Wheel of Fortune last night from MA named Mike. When Pat asked him if he was married, he said: “Yes, for 7 years to my wonderful HUSBAND Jerrod”.


292 posted on 01/24/2012 11:38:18 AM PST by anoldafvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: JudyM

None of what you say is true. None of it. You are either ignorant or malicious. Which is it?


293 posted on 01/24/2012 11:42:02 AM PST by ichabod1 (Mr. Gingrich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
I think the liberals plot for having 'occupy wall street' was done to activate a national uprising against the supposed 'evil' rich Republicans, namely Romney. As long as I have been watching the political games, liberals always accused that 'corporate' welfare is how Republicans get rich.
I agree, but that wasn't alluded to in the Hill piece at all.

I think rather than Romney refute them, he attempted to liken his personal gains as same as Obama using US taxpayers to bail out the auto industry. My objection is that by using this analogy, Romney ignores that what Obama did was not conservative
I think he used an awful analogy in comparing the turn-around efforts of venture capitalists to the stinker known as Govt Motors. However inept of an analogy it might be, it in no way measures up to the "Vulture Capitalist" rhetoric of Newt. Perhaps he can leave that particular TR tendency in the past.
294 posted on 01/24/2012 4:48:38 PM PST by Rate_Determining_Step (We got the socialism, how come we at least don't get the good cars from Europe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

Late to the party but I’m glad to see FR finally bailing on this obvious RINO Tranny Mann Coulter.

I’ve never understood the attraction some people (even FReepers!!) had for this repulsive, underweight, chain-smoking likely-lesbian.

And now the skank opens her mouth and removes all doubt that she’s an establishment-loving RINO B!TCH!!

Good riddance!!


295 posted on 01/24/2012 5:32:52 PM PST by Longdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-295 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson