Skip to comments.
Intelligence Study Links Low I.Q to Prejudice, Racism, Conservative Views (Bart Alert!)
vibe ^
| 2/1/2012
| Gangstarr Girl
Posted on 02/03/2012 1:43:43 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Supposedly this is being touted as news among some liberal hatemongers. I notice the study itself is merely mentioned but not heavily sources. I wonder if the study really DOES mention conservative politics.
Of course we know the hip hop community, the target audience of vine.com, is VERY intelligent--no prejudice in THAT community, no sir.
To: SoFloFreeper
Last post: “sources” should be “sourced”. Damn you, auto-correct!
To: SoFloFreeper
While murdering 60 million unborn babies is the work of college educated liberal geniuses.
3
posted on
02/03/2012 1:55:10 AM PST
by
donna
(I want to live in a Judeo/Christian country where we know that, before God, men & women are equal.)
To: SoFloFreeper
Intelligence Study Links Low I.Q to Prejudice, Racism, Conservative Views (Bart Alert!)Hold on for a tick. My last IQ score has me at 150, just into Jeenyuss catagory.
But I view Reagan and Goldwater as far too liberal, because I am THAT conservative.
So maybe the generators of this study are the Low IQ Dolts?
4
posted on
02/03/2012 2:02:17 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Yes, I am THAT Conservative.)
To: SoFloFreeper
I'll see their study and raise it nine more. ;-)
Articles that explain how modern liberals suffer from a mental disorder.
5
posted on
02/03/2012 2:03:22 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: SoFloFreeper
This article makes perfect sense; it's surprising more reports of this type have not already been published. Observation of the popular culture will reveal that the modern definition of intelligence in the media has actually morphed into acceptance of homosexuality. It's become psychological blackmail: either profess your tolerance or embrace of this perversion or be called stupid.
Up to now it's been subtle but this "revelation" could be indicative of a shift to escalate the pressure on those of us who don't get the message.
Of course, the words prejudice, bigotry and even racism have long ago become euphemisms for opposition to gay rights; this can be seen from the way the language of the left has conflated the ideas together. You're not merely "racist" anymore. Since the '70s you're "racist, sexist, homophobe."
6
posted on
02/03/2012 2:17:18 AM PST
by
stormhill
To: xsmommy; tioga
I am betting that Democratic Underground doesn’t have a Word For The Day thread! The dilettantes touting this study probably don’t even know what a dilettante is.
7
posted on
02/03/2012 2:19:07 AM PST
by
Explorer89
(And now, let the wild rumpus start!!)
To: SoFloFreeper
Theories include that people of low intelligence gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, which stress resistance to change and, in turn, prejudice. Less intelligent people are possibly drawn to conservative ideologies because such beliefs feature "structure and order," which make it easier to comprehend a complicated world. In the 1950s my mother told me that Communists kill those who disagree with their ideology because they are less than human, and therefore all right to get out of the way. It is the same logic applied to political enemies of today and yesterday, with special camps, re-education initiatives, and other features associated with the culture of death. Remember the legacy of Pol Pot?
It is the same logic system that supports abortion. Lawyers simply declare that a developing embryo is less than human and therefore okay to dispense. It is the same logic system that supported slavery; just declare that certain people are subhuman.
8
posted on
02/03/2012 2:23:30 AM PST
by
olezip
To: SoFloFreeper
Well I’ll just turn my degrees in and go back to dragging my prejudiced knuckles on the ground. I’m so glad they explained why I am so conservative. Mystery solved!
9
posted on
02/03/2012 2:25:39 AM PST
by
Mom MD
(The country needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask)
To: Lazamataz
On the several tests I had in my younger days, I scored lowest at 135; and as high as 165.
Makes me smart enough to know the difference between resisting change for the sake of change; advocating for a specific, targeted change that improves or simplifies a condition or process; and fighting for reactionary changes to undo the interminable changes Liberals forced upon us without understanding the reasons for the old ways, or the (to me) obvious consequences of their changes.
Or maybe I’m just an addled curmudgeon, as I’ve been accused of being all too often, who is good at taking IQ tests.
10
posted on
02/03/2012 2:26:58 AM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
("Public service" does NOT mean servicing the people, like a bull among heifers.)
To: ApplegateRanch
Or maybe Im just an addled curmudgeon, as Ive been accused of being all too often, who is good at taking IQ tests.THAT'S ME!!!!
11
posted on
02/03/2012 2:27:47 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Yes, I am THAT Conservative.)
To: ApplegateRanch
(I was invited to Mensa, but who wants to hang around a bunch of stupid losers like them guise?)
12
posted on
02/03/2012 2:29:51 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Yes, I am THAT Conservative.)
To: Explorer89
The dilettantes touting this study probably dont even know what a dilettante is.I almost got sent to the principal in 6th grade, because I said my life's ambition was to be a retired dilettante.
I have achieved that dream, so the last laugh is on my 'outraged' teacher.
And, yes; I DID know what a dilettante was at the time.
13
posted on
02/03/2012 2:34:26 AM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
("Public service" does NOT mean servicing the people, like a bull among heifers.)
To: Lazamataz
Et tu, Laz? I gave them the same answer. LOL
14
posted on
02/03/2012 2:36:33 AM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
("Public service" does NOT mean servicing the people, like a bull among heifers.)
To: SoFloFreeper
..well according to this survey, since I've mastered this,I should be just above Obama and two levels below orangutang
15
posted on
02/03/2012 2:36:43 AM PST
by
Doogle
(((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
To: SoFloFreeper
This is like saying, “an apple”, “an orange”, and a jet aircraft”. Two of the three go together. And yes, the first two I believe are linked to either low IQ or very poor self- esteem, violent upbringing, ignorant parents and the like, etc. But obviously the third one, Conservatism, bears NO CONNECTION. How dare they.
16
posted on
02/03/2012 2:37:30 AM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(Major riots notwithstanding, let us kick this Marxist imposter out of office once and for all!)
To: ApplegateRanch
17
posted on
02/03/2012 2:42:33 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Yes, I am THAT Conservative.)
To: Lazamataz
Dang, I only scored 146 (but I had been awake for 24+ hours).
18
posted on
02/03/2012 2:43:07 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
To: Smokin' Joe
19
posted on
02/03/2012 2:45:45 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Yes, I am THAT Conservative.)
To: ApplegateRanch
I am at a loss for what she thought that you DID mean?
20
posted on
02/03/2012 2:50:19 AM PST
by
Explorer89
(And now, let the wild rumpus start!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson