Skip to comments.
Ron Paul Tells CNN’s Piers Morgan Only “Honest Rape” Warrants An Abortion. (Honest Rape?)
Hinterland Gazette ^
Posted on 02/05/2012 6:59:20 PM PST by mnehring
Edited on 02/05/2012 7:06:55 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-343 next last
To: mamelukesabre
Abortion is wrong because it kills an innocent baby, NOT because it lets the woman off the hook (being punished by pregnancy).
21
posted on
02/05/2012 7:18:07 PM PST
by
eccentric
(a.k.a. baldwidow)
To: surroundedbyblue
NOTE: the pro-abortion after rape folks use a slightly different argument. They claim that any child is also party to the crime as a trespasser.
So what you have to do to avoid letting them go off on that particular high dudgeon rant is flip to "darned shame we don't execute the rapists".
That short circuits their argument and puts them into a totally different sticky wicket many of them aren't able to deal with.
Most Leftwingtards will give up in exaspiration, turn their backs on you and probably call you a name.
Those just this side of pro-life (but still actually pro-abortion), who think they are conservative, might take up the argument of executing rapists.
That's just a guide to debates.
Now, executing the chillun' for the crimes of the father? You and I know what these pukes are proposing ~ but it's best to use the old "a soft word turneth away wrath" option first ~ even if we do propose killing the rapist. It's one of the few instances where killing someone can be considered the "soft word".
22
posted on
02/05/2012 7:19:10 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: surroundedbyblue; mamelukesabre
Do you support the nine to ten month imprisonment of a rape victim to ensure that her rapists seed is brought to term?
23
posted on
02/05/2012 7:20:19 PM PST
by
Grunthor
(Mitt Romney and anyone supporting him can go fornicate themselves with a cactus)
To: Christie at the beach
Sorry for the double post.
To: mamelukesabre
So then you are fine with the morning after pill? It is the same thing, just in pill form. What Paul describes is the older way, probably how he did it when he was an OBGYN. Now, they just give them an RU486 pill.
25
posted on
02/05/2012 7:21:59 PM PST
by
mnehring
To: mamelukesabre
mamelukesabre: “I think its pretty obvious what he meant. I think its pretty obvious hes right.”
Agreed. I’m sick of the way people demonize everyone who isn’t their candidate. Ron Paul says some things I agree with and some things I disagree with. It’s dishonest to try and warp what he says into something it’s not. Seriously. I despise the way people parse everything a candidate says in order to demonize them. Why do some people feel the need to destroy everyone who isn’t their candidate?
26
posted on
02/05/2012 7:23:12 PM PST
by
CitizenUSA
(Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Anyone can do it. Good is more work but worth it!)
To: Grunthor
Do you support the nine to ten month imprisonment of a rape victim to ensure that her rapists seed is brought to term?So, you don't want them 'punished with a child'? Where have I heard that line before?
27
posted on
02/05/2012 7:24:03 PM PST
by
mnehring
To: Grunthor
Since DNA is so incredibly definitive, would you support us in simply moving from ID'ing the rapist to his immediate execution in a sort of foreshortened due process?
You could do this at home with nothing more than a couple of wires appropriately placed and a 210 plug.
Or, would you demand we use licensed medical practitioners who inject various drugs?
28
posted on
02/05/2012 7:24:09 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: svcw
You know what he means and if you don't you probably wouldn't be able to follow the explanation. And I am not a Ron Paul supporter. This board use to be rich with good honest political discussion. Now it's just a bunch of name calling and people trying to get a zinger in or act like they are some sort of bad ass. Start using your brain and argue your point. Prove your idea has merit. Don't just resort to name calling. Over what issues should Ron Paul be put away. Prove you have some intellect by providing documented proof that is so damning that a court should establish guardianship over his actions. I haven't really heard him say anything that George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, or Madison hasn't said or inferred in the past. If Ron Paul is delusional then are they as well?
29
posted on
02/05/2012 7:25:45 PM PST
by
lynn4303
To: mnehring
Right and who is going to determine what is an ‘honest’ rape. A shot of estrogen? This guy’s off his nut.
30
posted on
02/05/2012 7:26:10 PM PST
by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
To: mnehring
Honestly ....He’s kuh rayyyyy zeeeee.
31
posted on
02/05/2012 7:26:44 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: surroundedbyblue
So you support executing children for the crimes of the father?? What effect would the killing of an adulteress have upon any unborn child that might exist as a consequence of such adultery? Do you think such effect would be intentional or unintentional? I see nothing in Mosaic law that would suggest that an adulteress should be allowed to live long enough to bear her child; indeed, I would expect that giving adulterer the satisfaction of having spawned someone who would outlive him would have been considered a bad thing.
32
posted on
02/05/2012 7:27:01 PM PST
by
supercat
(Renounce Covetousness.)
To: mnehring
"Why go with 'Honest Rape' when you can have
If you want 'DISHONEST' it's 'DISHONEST JOHN!', 1-800-DISHONEST!
ps:
33
posted on
02/05/2012 7:27:01 PM PST
by
mkjessup
To: mnehring
Honestly ....He’s kuh rayyyyy zeeeee.
34
posted on
02/05/2012 7:27:16 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: mnehring; muawiyah
“Do you support the nine to ten month imprisonment of a rape victim to ensure that her rapists seed is brought to term?”
It really is a yes or no question.
35
posted on
02/05/2012 7:27:16 PM PST
by
Grunthor
(Mitt Romney and anyone supporting him can go fornicate themselves with a cactus)
To: Grunthor
Who said anything about imprisonment??
My position is abortion is wrong even in cases of rape. Those why support the rape exception are not pro-life & are woefully misguided if they think they are.
36
posted on
02/05/2012 7:27:42 PM PST
by
surroundedbyblue
(Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
To: mamelukesabre; All
An “Honest” Rape is when a woman is violated against her will. Not when some girl gives it up for her boyfriend and then screams rapes, or some “wife” comes home from a business trip, after banging her boss in the hotel, and tells her husband he raped her. Due to the line of work I’m in, I know scenarios like these happen all the time.
37
posted on
02/05/2012 7:27:42 PM PST
by
no dems
(I'm more concerned with America's future than I am Newt's past.)
To: CitizenUSA
Ron Paul simply demonized himself. He knows the majority of people now believe that abortion is murder or should be.
If he had the sense God gave a goose he'd kept his mouth shut on the issue.
38
posted on
02/05/2012 7:27:51 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: 1_Rain_Drop
It is not the fault of Congressman Paul (nor even of Ms. Goldberg) that our society has expanded the application of the word "rape" from the heinous crime it originally described to include consensual sexual intercourse when one party is deemed by virtue of a legal convention, or in some cases a legal fiction, to have been 'incapable of giving consent', or in the feverswamps of the academic left to seemingly include sexual intercourse the woman later comes to regret, or by the most lunatic of feminists to include all heterosexual intercourse.
(Incidentally, Ms. Goldberg was wrong: Polanski's actions not only satisfied the definition of rape on the basis of his victim's age, but on the basis of the classical definition, since she said "no" until he plied her with quaaludes until she said neither yes nor no, and thus was "rape rape" to use her way of distinguishing the traditionally understood heinous crime from its expanded redefinition.)
39
posted on
02/05/2012 7:27:59 PM PST
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: surroundedbyblue
“Who said anything about imprisonment??”
How do you expect to force rape victims to carry their attackers seed to term with it?
40
posted on
02/05/2012 7:30:37 PM PST
by
Grunthor
(Mitt Romney and anyone supporting him can go fornicate themselves with a cactus)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-343 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson