Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reddon; ExSoldier
Yes never surrender.

Santorum was at what 4%?

But Santorum kept going.And now he leads.

And Palin has a million times more charisma than Santorum. Palin would be so far ahead now.

Palin , Cain, Perry, Bachmann, all allowed the liberal mainstream media to push them out of this race. They should have kept going but they all quit because of the media. Never surrender.

26 posted on 02/15/2012 10:20:36 AM PST by Democrat_media (China is destroying all our jobs and manufacturing ability. China makes everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Democrat_media

“And Palin has a million times more charisma than Santorum. Palin would be so far ahead now.”

Ditto. I really doubt we’d be going through this now because the non-Romneys would have had a candidate to get behind from the get-go.

And I don’t understand the perception that she dropped out because of the media. The media had YEARS to throw everything they possibly could (and more) at her... and they did. And I don’t believe it worked.

As far as I’m concerned, Sarah looked fate in the eye, and turned her back, leaving us with the Romneybot, a sanctimonious, personality-challenged guy who couldn’t even win his own STATE, and a guy who was so demonized by the Media for YEARS that there’s very little chance he could ever win election as dog-catcher. Oh, yeah. And the nutty old man. Almost forgot about him.

THESE clowns are what we have to run against the worst President in history (by FAR)... and they’re such LOUSY candidates we might even lose against HIM.


108 posted on 02/16/2012 5:09:21 AM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Democrat_media

“Palin would be so far ahead now.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I respectfully disagree, women are the majority of registered voters and women decide in the end who is president, either by their vote or the withholding of their vote. The majority of women (the majority of the majority voting segment) tend to vote for “liberals”. In 2008 women chose a totally unqualified, unvetted “man” and I use the parentheses because I consider him a poor excuse for a man, over Hillary Clinton, a liberal democrat woman.

What all that boils down to is this, women WILL decide this primary and the general election, if they did not want a liberal democrat woman why does anyone think they want a conservative Republican woman? I think Sarah Palin is smart enough to see all this and that is why she is not running.


109 posted on 02/16/2012 5:15:53 AM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson