I guess that’s where I went wrong. Instead of stopping at the headline, I clicked the link and read the entire story.
If he was being threatened with a failing grade I would object. If he was being forced to sing against his will, that would be wrong. He was offered an opportunity to sing. He didn’t like the program so he decided not to sing. That’s that. Nothing to see here.
LOL! You may be on the wrong site.
Conservatives can see a lot here.
The mussies are going to love you.
You are already harness broken.
You need glasses.
Singing is a powerful indoctrination tool. The children in the school who will be forced to attend the assemblies where it is sung will be "groomed" ( just like pedophiles "groom" children) to be more accepting of Islam and conversion to this religion.
Axiom: It is impossible to have a religiously, politically, or culturally neutral education.
The inclusion or exclusion of this Muslim song is merely one example among thousands illustrating why this axiom is true. Whether it is included or excluded by the government chorus director has non-neutral consequences for all of the students who participate in the chorus or attend the assemblies where it is sung.
Fundamentally, government schools are a First Amendment and a freedom of conscience abomination because they **will** uphold and establish the religious, political, and cultural worldview of the most powerful voting mob, and trash those values of those with less power.
There is a solution complete separation of school and state.
(Not proof read)