Skip to comments.
Hot Idea for a Faster Hard Drive
ScienceNOW ^
| 7 February 2012
| Jim Heirbaut
Posted on 02/16/2012 8:16:39 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
02/16/2012 8:16:44 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
To: ShadowAce
3
posted on
02/16/2012 8:27:35 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: 2ndamendmentpa
4
posted on
02/16/2012 8:30:08 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
Is it better that core memory?
5
posted on
02/16/2012 8:41:52 PM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: neverdem
Is this totally different from HAMR?
6
posted on
02/16/2012 8:47:20 PM PST
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(FR: Now, More Than Ever.)
To: mylife
With that, gotta include the seamstress...
7
posted on
02/16/2012 8:51:31 PM PST
by
C210N
To: neverdem
I've had a Sony Magneto-Optical drive since the early 90's.
Writes magnetically, reads optically. Common name Mini Disc. Later recycled into the PSP UMD game carts.
To: neverdem
I’ve often wondered why they never put two or four heads on a single hard drive platter. You would essentially have two or four hard drives in one(depending on the number of heads. Then each head would be sequentially synchonized so that one head would read/write one bit, the next head the next bit, and so on. So if you have 4 heads, there would be 4 separate tracks each reading and writing slightly out of phase. You would quadruple your speed with 4 heads without increasing the RPMs of the platter. If a hard drive had 4 platters and 4 heads per platter, you’d have 16 times the speed.
To: C210N
It’s hard to believe we were using that stuff 30 years ago.
10
posted on
02/16/2012 8:58:13 PM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: 2ndamendmentpa
I recently bought a SSD for my primary home machine, and it’s incredible. The boost in performance was just amazing. I never knew how crappy the ‘old’ hard disks were until trying out one of these. From the time I hit the power button, around 5 or 6 seconds later, I’m logged in and using the computer. All apps that use the disk a lot also got a dramatic boost in performance.
The disk actually increased the “Windows Experience Index” for Windows 7 on my computer to a 7.4 out of 8.0.
11
posted on
02/16/2012 9:20:03 PM PST
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: mylife; C210N
Its hard to believe we were using that stuff 30 years ago. Not only that, but the seamstress
doesn't look the least bit Chinese.
12
posted on
02/16/2012 9:28:03 PM PST
by
cynwoody
To: 2ndamendmentpa
SSDs have a bleak future, researchers say
The take away from that article is the last paragraph:
" . . . . .
Considering the diminishing returns on performance versus capacity, Grupp said, "it's not going to be viable to go past 6.5nm ... 2024 is the end."
However, even with TLC flash at 6.5nm, Grupp calculates that SSDs will continue to outperform hard disk drives on throughput, 32,000 IOPS to 200 IOPS, respectively."
To: 2ndamendmentpa
SSDs have a bleak future, researchers say
The take away from that article is the last paragraph:
" . . . . .
Considering the diminishing returns on performance versus capacity, Grupp said, "it's not going to be viable to go past 6.5nm ... 2024 is the end."
However, even with TLC flash at 6.5nm, Grupp calculates that SSDs will continue to outperform hard disk drives on throughput, 32,000 IOPS to 200 IOPS, respectively."
To: neverdem
Great, we now get to watch trash faster, and we can store
more of it at a faster rate!
15
posted on
02/16/2012 9:52:31 PM PST
by
Getready
(Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
To: neverdem
uhm, no.
Get rid of plates and go SSD or crystalline type structures.
flpping something on a record player isn’t going to make it faster just tighter.
16
posted on
02/17/2012 12:29:58 AM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: mylife
Great shades of the past! My first career field in the AF was maintaining communications gear (tape/card punches/readers) and the “brains” of the show had 512 bytes of core memory. Neatly packaged in a box about the size of an attache case.
17
posted on
02/17/2012 3:14:36 AM PST
by
trebb
("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Thanks neverdem. Kilobyte, megabyte, gigabyte, terabyte, petabyte, exabyte, zettabyte, yottabyte...
18
posted on
02/17/2012 4:21:34 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(FReep this FReepathon!)
To: 2ndamendmentpa; KoRn; SoConPubbie; Vendome
SSDs use less power than HDD (and will continue to), weigh less (and will continue to for some time, possibly indefinitely), and remain speedier (give or take manufacturer), which probably points to SSDs in all mobile technology in the short and middle term (at least), and HDD capacity increasing and cheaper in fixed boxes, such as home vid, desktop PCs, and ‘the cloud’.
19
posted on
02/17/2012 4:29:58 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(FReep this FReepathon!)
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Salo; JosephW; Only1choice____Freedom; amigatec; stylin_geek; ...
20
posted on
02/17/2012 4:47:29 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson