Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hot Idea for a Faster Hard Drive
ScienceNOW ^ | 7 February 2012 | Jim Heirbaut

Posted on 02/16/2012 8:16:39 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 02/16/2012 8:16:44 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Somewhat related:

SSDs have a ‘bleak’ future, researchers say

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9224322/SSDs_have_a_bleak_future_researchers_say


2 posted on 02/16/2012 8:23:07 PM PST by 2ndamendmentpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Ping


3 posted on 02/16/2012 8:27:35 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndamendmentpa

Thanks for the link.


4 posted on 02/16/2012 8:30:08 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Is it better that core memory?


5 posted on 02/16/2012 8:41:52 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Is this totally different from HAMR?


6 posted on 02/16/2012 8:47:20 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (FR: Now, More Than Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife
With that, gotta include the seamstress...


7 posted on 02/16/2012 8:51:31 PM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I've had a Sony Magneto-Optical drive since the early 90's.

Writes magnetically, reads optically. Common name Mini Disc. Later recycled into the PSP UMD game carts.

8 posted on 02/16/2012 8:53:25 PM PST by rawcatslyentist (BO Stinks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’ve often wondered why they never put two or four heads on a single hard drive platter. You would essentially have two or four hard drives in one(depending on the number of heads. Then each head would be sequentially synchonized so that one head would read/write one bit, the next head the next bit, and so on. So if you have 4 heads, there would be 4 separate tracks each reading and writing slightly out of phase. You would quadruple your speed with 4 heads without increasing the RPMs of the platter. If a hard drive had 4 platters and 4 heads per platter, you’d have 16 times the speed.


9 posted on 02/16/2012 8:57:33 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

It’s hard to believe we were using that stuff 30 years ago.


10 posted on 02/16/2012 8:58:13 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndamendmentpa

I recently bought a SSD for my primary home machine, and it’s incredible. The boost in performance was just amazing. I never knew how crappy the ‘old’ hard disks were until trying out one of these. From the time I hit the power button, around 5 or 6 seconds later, I’m logged in and using the computer. All apps that use the disk a lot also got a dramatic boost in performance.

The disk actually increased the “Windows Experience Index” for Windows 7 on my computer to a 7.4 out of 8.0.


11 posted on 02/16/2012 9:20:03 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mylife; C210N
It’s hard to believe we were using that stuff 30 years ago.

Not only that, but the seamstress doesn't look the least bit Chinese.


12 posted on 02/16/2012 9:28:03 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndamendmentpa
SSDs have a ‘bleak’ future, researchers say

The take away from that article is the last paragraph:

" . . . . .

Considering the diminishing returns on performance versus capacity, Grupp said, "it's not going to be viable to go past 6.5nm ... 2024 is the end."

However, even with TLC flash at 6.5nm, Grupp calculates that SSDs will continue to outperform hard disk drives on throughput, 32,000 IOPS to 200 IOPS, respectively."
13 posted on 02/16/2012 9:32:12 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndamendmentpa
SSDs have a ‘bleak’ future, researchers say

The take away from that article is the last paragraph:

" . . . . .

Considering the diminishing returns on performance versus capacity, Grupp said, "it's not going to be viable to go past 6.5nm ... 2024 is the end."

However, even with TLC flash at 6.5nm, Grupp calculates that SSDs will continue to outperform hard disk drives on throughput, 32,000 IOPS to 200 IOPS, respectively."
14 posted on 02/16/2012 9:32:12 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Great, we now get to watch trash faster, and we can store
more of it at a faster rate!


15 posted on 02/16/2012 9:52:31 PM PST by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

uhm, no.

Get rid of plates and go SSD or crystalline type structures.

flpping something on a record player isn’t going to make it faster just tighter.


16 posted on 02/17/2012 12:29:58 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Great shades of the past! My first career field in the AF was maintaining communications gear (tape/card punches/readers) and the “brains” of the show had 512 bytes of core memory. Neatly packaged in a box about the size of an attache case.


17 posted on 02/17/2012 3:14:36 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks neverdem. Kilobyte, megabyte, gigabyte, terabyte, petabyte, exabyte, zettabyte, yottabyte...


18 posted on 02/17/2012 4:21:34 AM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndamendmentpa; KoRn; SoConPubbie; Vendome

SSDs use less power than HDD (and will continue to), weigh less (and will continue to for some time, possibly indefinitely), and remain speedier (give or take manufacturer), which probably points to SSDs in all mobile technology in the short and middle term (at least), and HDD capacity increasing and cheaper in fixed boxes, such as home vid, desktop PCs, and ‘the cloud’.


19 posted on 02/17/2012 4:29:58 AM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Salo; JosephW; Only1choice____Freedom; amigatec; stylin_geek; ...

20 posted on 02/17/2012 4:47:29 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson