Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One-armed man sues Starbucks for not hiring him
mynorthwest.com ^ | Feb. 21, 2012 | unknown

Posted on 02/22/2012 2:15:30 PM PST by matt1234

A man who was born with half a left arm is suing Starbucks for failing to hire him as a barista.

Eli Pierre sued the company in San Diego two weeks ago for unspecified damages.

Pierre says that during a Feb. 1 interview for a San Diego job, the store manager told him that the coffee flavoring syrups were placed high up and a one-armed man couldn't work there.

The discrimination suit claims that the former bartender was capable of doing the job but was never given a chance to fully explain his capabilities or possible accommodation as required under state law.

Starbucks says it employs many disabled persons and Pierre's disability wouldn't disqualify him. The company says his application was thoughtfully considered and disputes his version of the interview.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: starbucks; wa; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
First a dwarf, then a one-legged woman, and now this. It seems the lawyers know who has the deep pockets.
1 posted on 02/22/2012 2:15:42 PM PST by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: matt1234

This guy read the Americans With Disabilities Act. You have to show clearly that the man could not do the job, after you make “reasonable accommodations”.


2 posted on 02/22/2012 2:18:35 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

I’ve heard it’s very hard for lawyers to find work nowadays.


3 posted on 02/22/2012 2:18:45 PM PST by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234
At Papa John's Pizza at the PX, standing in line to order pizza behind a couple of smelly, sweaty GIs that had just finished a run, each with a missing lower leg.... I no longer consider loss of a lower limb a disability. A challange, sure, but not a disability.

I quit whining about ANYTHING after that experience.

/johnny

4 posted on 02/22/2012 2:22:30 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Maybe he could be kept busy hanging wallpaper?


5 posted on 02/22/2012 2:24:34 PM PST by myrabach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Couldn’t this guy get a job at a casino?


6 posted on 02/22/2012 2:24:41 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Next thing you know, they’ll want to pitch in MLB!

Oh...wait.

Nevermind.

(Go Angels!)


7 posted on 02/22/2012 2:24:59 PM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234
This is the man at Starbucks that didn't hire the One Armed Man. He said he had personal reasons for doing so.


8 posted on 02/22/2012 2:25:07 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

I could have sworn the one-armed man fell to his death while being pursued by Richard Kimble. Who knew he survived and later sought work at Starbucks?


9 posted on 02/22/2012 2:26:35 PM PST by rockvillem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

And what constitutes “reasonable” a court will decide.


10 posted on 02/22/2012 2:27:06 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

And wasn’t there a hitter in the 40’s with NO arms who batted around .260?


11 posted on 02/22/2012 2:28:21 PM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

Common sense usually works. In this case, the man really thought he could serve up coffee since he previously held a job serving drinks. A huge clue to the starbucks interviewer.


12 posted on 02/22/2012 2:29:17 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

In an update to the story, Harrison Ford refused comment.


13 posted on 02/22/2012 2:29:48 PM PST by jimmango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jimmango

I guess I’m old school. Whenever I think of the Fugitive, David Janssen is the first to come to mind.


14 posted on 02/22/2012 2:32:17 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Probably the guy who was doing the hiring should have been more careful with his questions. “How much experience do you have as a barista?” or something like that.

Or maybe he should have said the same thing when the police start questioning you. “Sorry, I can’t answer any more questions until my lawyer is present.”

Good grief.


15 posted on 02/22/2012 2:32:21 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
"Butterhook"

16 posted on 02/22/2012 2:34:34 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
Couldn’t this guy get a job at a casino?

Where to put the coins. Decision, decisions...

17 posted on 02/22/2012 2:34:34 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Santorum says he isn't a visionary. Sorry Rick, without a vision the people perish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: matt1234
I'm not a big fan of so-called “anti-discrimination” laws; because, instead of addressing their original good intent, they usually end as “cash cows” for trial lawyers who use them to assert special rights for special groups. That said, if this is an accurate account, this incident appears to be exactly what these types of laws were intended to help prevent.

The man wants to work; has demonstrated he has the skill to do this type of job in the past and, yet, he was denied the opportunity to even demonstrate he could do the job.

For those who do not see the merit in this man's complaint: Would it be beneficial to the taxpayers that he stay home on welfare/disability???

18 posted on 02/22/2012 2:36:17 PM PST by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

I once worked for a boss who had only one arm.

My co-workers had nicknamed me “The Fugitive” because
the one-armed man was ruining my life.


19 posted on 02/22/2012 2:41:17 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Probably he shouldn’t have assumed that just because he needs two hands to do the job doesn’t mean it can’t be done one handed. I used to work the grill at McDs and if you asked me could the job be done one handed I’d say not a chance. Then I started going to the Desert Museum, they had a burger grill there and frequently the guy running it was the same one armed guy, I know why he got all those shifts too, he killed it. Probably the fastest most efficient grill guy I’ve ever seen.


20 posted on 02/22/2012 2:42:52 PM PST by discostu (I did it 35 minutes ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson