Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George Will: Take Congress, not White House
Politico ^ | 3/2/2012 | Tim Mak

Posted on 03/02/2012 6:28:27 AM PST by KansasGirl

Columnist George Will says the 2012 presidential looks like it might be a lost cause for Republicans and believes that the primary goal of conservatives should be to retain control of the House and win the Senate so Congress can restrain President Barack Obama while the GOP grooms its talent for 2016.

“Romney and Rick Santorum… are conservatives, although of strikingly different stripes. Neither, however, seems likely to be elected… If either is nominated, conservatives should vote for him,” Will writes in his upcoming Sunday column, obtained in advance by POLITICO.

However, Will argues, that control of both house of Congress is more attainable and more important.

“[T]here would come a point when… conservatives turn their energies to a goal much more attainable than… electing Romney or Santorum president. It is the goal of retaining control of the House and winning control of the Senate.. [C]onservatives this year should have as their primary goal making sure Republicans wield all the gavels in Congress in 2013,” writes Will.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: KansasGirl

There is a point to be made that it just never works out well for the USA when one Party has all the enchiladas. Politicians need to face checks and balances.


41 posted on 03/02/2012 7:01:14 AM PST by apoliticalone (Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

Obama will merely bypass congress and they will let him. He needs to be defeated now.


42 posted on 03/02/2012 7:01:14 AM PST by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Agreed, I would never leave the slot blank but I sure as hell won’t be voting for Romney. After all, a vote for Romney is hardly better than voting for Obama outright.

In fact, maybe we should get started now on encouraging people to write in Gingrich and Santorum if Romney is the nominee. They won’t win but maybe the voice will be loud enough to rattle the GOPe


43 posted on 03/02/2012 7:01:47 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

we really need to do both, take the congress and the white house.
Obummer has already demonstrated he can and will circumvent the congress to achieve his goals.


44 posted on 03/02/2012 7:04:29 AM PST by WorkerbeeCitizen (I STAND WITH ISRAEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
"Obama's driving us towards the cliff at 100 mph" is not a good reason to vote for someone who will only drive us towards the cliff at 80 mph.

Someone is going to take the oath of office next January, and it sure as hell can't be Obama. Sitting out or going 3rd party places Obama in there. Any one on our side will be light years better. Of the one's left standing, we have to vote for the best one. Four years of Obama means Kagan will be one of the moderates on the court and more endless executive branch trampling of the constitution with no recourse for four more years.

We have elected some great House members and conservative Senators and we'll need to keep the pressure on them to fight for the people that put them there, and not crack to the pressure of the party poo-bahs. There work is meaningless with a marxist megalomaniac in the White House.

45 posted on 03/02/2012 7:05:47 AM PST by ilgipper (Everything you get from the government was taken from someone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
to retain control of the House and win the Senate so Congress can restrain President Barack Obama while the GOP grooms its talent for 2016.

With the POS still in the WH, all will remain ops normal. Obama will still get his nominees onto the courts and his legislation will still move forward... and forget any hope of Obamacare repeal. The GOP is simply too timid to face him head-on.

46 posted on 03/02/2012 7:08:19 AM PST by ScottinVA (GOP, meet Courage... Courage, meet GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I won’t vote for Romney either - I’m with you. The country needs Gingrich right now. Pray for a miracle.


47 posted on 03/02/2012 7:10:13 AM PST by stonehouse01 (Equal rights for unborn women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
“why is Will saying it”

Who knows? He's a columnist, and has to write opinions for a living. He predicted last year that either Pawlenty or Daniels would be the nominee. In my view, if any of these people were that accurate they could have made lots of money betting on the outcomes. I highly doubt any of them would bet significant money on their predictions.

48 posted on 03/02/2012 7:11:50 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
If gas prices continue rising, I don't see how Obama keeps the White House.

Too much is being placed on the impact of gas prices. Obama's already pushing for higher taxation on the oil companies. With the mood of the country morphing into class envy, he'll exploit it into an "us-vs.-them" mindset vs. "Big Oil." Also, a well-timed, albeit token, drilling approval, along with an SPR release will drop those prices significantly enough to fool the sheep.

Remember... American voters as a whole are not critical thinkers. They act based on what they see at face value.

49 posted on 03/02/2012 7:13:53 AM PST by ScottinVA (GOP, meet Courage... Courage, meet GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
George Will is hopelessly out of contact with the real America.

Just yesterday it was reported that EMPLOYMENT among Youth was at 54%.

That's where we win.

That's Greece levels of unemployment in this country for a major demographic. That's Obama kicking his former supporters in the teeth.

They will never forgive him!

50 posted on 03/02/2012 7:15:40 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
George Will is hopelessly out of contact with the real America.

Just yesterday it was reported that EMPLOYMENT among Youth was at 54%.

That's where we win.

That's Greece levels of unemployment in this country for a major demographic. That's Obama kicking his former supporters in the teeth.

They will never forgive him!

51 posted on 03/02/2012 7:15:46 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
I'm gonna go vote for Newt next Tuesday and then I'm going to burn my Republican card.

I'm going to burn it in front of a certain couple of people, who have both drunk the kool-aid.

52 posted on 03/02/2012 7:19:16 AM PST by OKSooner (Never take a known wise-@$$ shooting with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

Analogy not applicable. German General Staff is not analogous to American Congress.


53 posted on 03/02/2012 7:23:32 AM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
What pointy head East Coast educated intellectual does not realize is, that, despite electing a Republican Congress, IT WILL BE DISBANDED UNCONSTITUTIONALLY BY OBAMA IF HE IS RE-ELECTED.

This is not rocket science we are talking about. He will order it shut down by Executive Order and order tanks around Capitol Hill, arresting any Congressman who cannot go into hiding and assuming all legislative activities under his administrative branches of the Executive.

George Will. Yeah. Real smart cookie that Will feller.

54 posted on 03/02/2012 7:24:15 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (I liked the FREE REPUBLIC of years on end which NEVER had a problem with Rick Santorum, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

Will, take a long hike on a short pier!

You and your fellow faux beltway conservatives have lost it with the rest of us.

Will, you have sunk so low, you are doing OPeds with Politico!


55 posted on 03/02/2012 7:24:26 AM PST by Grampa Dave (ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

If conservatives were to control Congress, why would they sit by doing nothing about controlling czars and agencies previous liberal Congresses created?


56 posted on 03/02/2012 7:26:26 AM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

I had posted previously about seeing this same attitude among the FOX commentators a month or two ago. The ones who predicted that Romney would win the nomination also, when pressed, predicted that Obama would win the White House. The urban elite class thinks that liberalism sells, plain and simple. That’s why they have been pushing Romney as the “electable” candidate. Yet when forced to take the next logical step, they have to admit that if liberalism is what sells, people are going to vote for Obama over Romney. Even they realize that Liberal Lite doesn’t beat the real thing.

The urban elites don’t understand the lesson of Reagan, that conservatism when it’s articulated in a way that people can understand is what REALLY sells to the majority of the country. Because at heart, the majority of the country is conservative. That’s why Thomas Sowell is absolutely right that Newt Gingrich is the most electable candidate of the bunch. That’s why liberals don’t try to beat conservatives on ideas, but resort to lies, smears, fearmongering, personal attacks, etc.


57 posted on 03/02/2012 7:32:04 AM PST by JediJones (Watch "Gingrich to Michigan: Change or Die" on YouTube. Best Speech Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
If the DC GOP bumbles the easiest White House victory in 30 years, we either remove the leadership entirely and replace it with conservative activists, or we leave and go third party. The fact that they might not even win the White House against one of the greatest human disasters in the western hemisphere in a hundred years is absurd.

What you said! It is beyond stupid that the worst President ever, with the economy in the toilet, is somehow invincible.

58 posted on 03/02/2012 7:32:12 AM PST by Marathoner (In the 80s we had Reagan, Johnny Cash and Bob Hope. Now we have Obama, no cash and no hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

As far as the Republican RINOs, Beltway bandits, lobbyists, Bureaucratic Mandarins, spin doctors and consultants are concerned, they would much prefer a liberal Democrat to a conservative Republican.

While the Republicans will almost certainly keep the House and gain the Senate, when it is time for a brokered convention, they will strongly have the upper hand, and the eventual nominee will almost certainly be more conservative than the current bunch.

And a conservative nominee has a good chance to become POTUS. So even before the convention, there are some standards that need to be set for this nominee, as vital to the country.

1) There is a general consensus that Obamacare must be destroyed. But the nominee has got to have vigorous ideas as to how this collapse is to be managed so as not to turn into a major disaster.

2) Likewise, there are going to have to be immense spending cuts and reductions in the size and power of the federal government. This has to be done like surgery to remove a massive tumor. To remove the tumor must be done, but the patient must not be killed in the process.

3) A big part of this, and this will be personally hard for whoever is POTUS, is to agree, with the help of congress and the courts, to *reduce* the power of the POTUS, legally ending the most unconstitutional abuses of the “imperial presidency” by law. This means no more “presidential signing statements”, “Czars”, strict limits on recess appointments, and the restoration of both a strict War Powers Act, and the doctrine of Posse Comitatus.

4) Much of the internal security apparatus of the US must be consolidated. Currently there are 100+ federal police agencies, and police powers have been given to non-police agencies. There needs to be perhaps a dozen such agencies, and all national policing must be done through these.

The TSA needs to be reduced to a fraction of its current size, and their active security role should be privatized.

5) Much federal power needs to return to the states. Most federal lands taken from the states should be returned to them for their own use.

6) Vast amounts of federal regulations must be undone. The slogan of the new administration should be, “If there is no clear constitutional authority for the federal government to do this, it will be discontinued.”


59 posted on 03/02/2012 7:39:32 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

I’m done with voting for the “lesser of two evils”.


60 posted on 03/02/2012 7:44:12 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson