When I heard she claimed she had spent $3000 in the past 3 years, I wondered what she was using. Certainly not anything commonly used now.

Leather and electric toys are very expensive and indispensable to the well being and health of a college coed.

sfl

Maybe the $3000 a year is paying for abortions?

Truly is amazing how this just happened to be timed so it diverts attention from a the forged BC.

Definitely a timing issue.....but nothing at all to do with the BC

It's a coordinated effort to bend and shape pubic opinion on the birth control religious issue

I have to admire you guys, you keep beating this dead horse until you are pounding dirt....

Nobody outside the conservative movement cares one millisecond about his BC...

It’s proof she’s full of it. Nobody pays 250 dollars a month for contraception.

Truly is amazing how this just happened to be timed so it diverts attention from a the forged BC

I agree with you. Every time is BC heats up something becomes a big distraction. It's ridiculous.

Don’t be so sure. Everybody knows cougars have an insatiable sexual appetite. And she’s surrounded by 18-22 year old boys.

Although, I wouldn’t have hit that, even when I was 18-22.

You honestly think that’s a Cougar?

She’s playing for the other team.

To quote Colonel Pickering in MY FAIR LADY: “I’M DASHED!”

http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/

PUBLIC INTEREST LAW SCHOLARS PROGRAM

What else is new. By Monday morning she is going to wish she never went to the hill. Rush is going to let her have it mon.

Okay. Lemme see now, - - - . You say “Let’s hear it for the “community organizer”!’ and this ringer law chick wants a government subsidy to do you know what. Got it!

Hmmmmmm - - - .

Nah! No self-respecting man would stoop so low to be called that! No way!

Thanks for the ping!

Yeah. Whatever did happen to those Herman Cain accusers?

I don't think she is getting loans. I think she has some public scholarship. You know, the ones we Taxpayers fund.

I may be wrong about this. Anybody know where the money comes from? Follow the money, it's the only was to be sure.

The $250 is probably what she leaves on the Nightstand when she goes home in the morning.

Honest, not just being catty—this “co ed” looks like a MAN to me. Look at the jaw, the neck...

Short Chicago Tribune article (with Flukes video) supplies the salient details of the Limbaugh/Flukes firestorm, including:

"Fluke had attempted to testify last month at a congressional committee hearing on the Obama administration’s new rule requiring employers to offer health plans that include birth control coverage, but she was excluded from the panel. She testified instead at a mock hearing organized by Democratic lawmakers...."

Rush Limbaugh: Obama calls Sandra Fluke to express 'support'

Little Reported BACKGROUND: Who Is Sandra Flukes?

The GateWay Pundit now linking to same source as thread below:

THREAD: Sandra Fluke’s Appearance Is No Fluke ( Rush & the Slut Fluke, Mega Leftist)

Sandra Fluke’s Appearance Is No Fluke

Posted by Just a Grunt on Mar 02, 2012 at 10:49 am

For me the interesting part of the story is the ever-evolving “coed”. I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy.

During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.

In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.

While she is described as a “third year law student” they always fail to mention that she is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.

July 30 2011

Does your campus’s LSRJ chapter face opposition in regard to facilitating a comprehensive conversation about reproductive justice? Well mine definitely does! While my campus has a mix of people with different backgrounds, and a rich liberal arts community, the Midwest doesn’t exactly scream bleeding liberal. Some LSRJ chapters at conservative campuses face opposition in the form of other, more conservative, student run organizations; some face it from their administrations, and others from their peers, or the community in general. Whatever the opposition is, it can be incredibly frustrating and disheartening.
The question is, how do we combat this conservative opposition and oppression, in order to facilitate a discussion and educate others about the RJ movement? I am obviously not alone in facing these problems, as Sandra Fluke of Georgetown lead a packed room in a discussion on this question at the first Issue Caucus that I attended at the Leadership Institute, LSRJ’s national conference at Berkeley.
While no solution was definitively reached, and I personally don’t begin to have the “right” answer, I was really charged by the discussion and feel many great ideas were presented. Some campus chapters decided to take an adversarial approach, feeling it important to use those “scary” words the opposition fears.

Further background research on Ms Fluke reveals that she got her start in government in New York in 2009.

Sandra Fluke’s professional background in domestic violence and human trafficking began with Sanctuary for Families in New York City. There, she launched the agency’s pilot Program Evaluation Initiative. While at Sanctuary, she co-founded the New York Statewide Coalition for Fair Access to Family Court, which after a twenty-year stalemate, successfully advocated for legislation granting access to civil orders of protection for unmarried victims of domestic violence, including LGBTQ victims and teens. Sandra was also a member of the Manhattan Borough President’s Taskforce on Domestic Violence and numerous other New York City and New York State coalitions that successfully advocated for policy improvements impacting victims of domestic violence.
As the 2010 recipient of the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles Fran Kandel Public Interest Grant, she researched, wrote, and produced an instructional film on how to apply for a domestic violence restraining order in pro per. She has also interned with the Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking; Polaris Project; Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County; Break the Cycle; the Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project; NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund; Crime Victim and Sexual Assault Services; and the Human Services Coalition of Tompkins County.
Through Georgetown’s clinic programs, Sandra has proposed legislation based on fact-finding in Kenya regarding child trafficking for domestic work, and has represented victims of domestic violence in protection order cases. Sandra is the Development Editor of the Journal of Gender and the Law, and served as the President of Law Students for Reproductive Justice, and the Vice President of the Women’s Legal Alliance. In her first year, she also co-founded a campus committee addressing human trafficking. Cornell University awarded her a B. S. in Policy Analysis & Management, as well as Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies in 2003.

My only question is, how does someone go from being a champion of domestic violence issues to an expert of women’s reproductive health issues?

Who’s *his* daddy? We need to know more about Sandy than its age.