Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

ADDITIONAL DETAILS:

Two-week-old baby who died of herpes 'contracted disease through circumcision'

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER

Last updated at 5:20 AM on 4th March 2012

EXCERPT:

The latest casualty of the tradition was the unidentified boy who died at Maimonides Hospital in Brooklyn, New York in September, according to the Daily News.

His official cause of death was 'disseminated herpes simplex virus Type 1, complicating ritual circumcision with oral suction'.

The identity of the mohel - a religious official who specialises in circumcisions - is unknown.

This is not the first time that an infant has died as a result of the ultra-Orthodox ritual of metzizah b' peh, which is the practice of using the mouth to remove blood. A baby boy died in New York in 2004 after undergoing the ceremony.

Health experts have criticised the ritual on the ground that it involves 'inherent risks' to infants' health. However, the practice seems to have originated as a way of avoiding infection by cleaning the open wound.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2109965/Two-week-old-baby-died-herpes-contracted-disease-circumcision.html#ixzz1oNcx2FtB

1 posted on 03/06/2012 2:58:04 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: James C. Bennett

“the rabbi or mohel removes blood from the wound with his mouth.”

I wonder if the rabbi will get charged with sexually molesting a child.


2 posted on 03/06/2012 3:01:16 PM PST by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett

Sad. But I suspect that there is a touch of antisemitism behind this story. There seems to be a growing movement on the left to abolish the practice of circumcision entirely, as we saw recently in San Francisco.

One case after eight years in NYC, with its numerous hospitals. How many other people have died in those hospitals from accidental infections? And are they sure this was the cause of the infection?

If so, then I hope they will deal with the problem sensibly.


3 posted on 03/06/2012 3:06:28 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett

Sad. RIP.


4 posted on 03/06/2012 3:07:29 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett

It sure sounds like they don’t take mohels with herpes or other contagious diseases out of this kind of service. Catching the germs from an infant might be one thing, but giving it to one is another.


5 posted on 03/06/2012 3:09:55 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett

That is one truly bizarre ritual. I was raised a Baptist and have seen more than my share of those, as well as endured countless hours of indoctrination I wish I had back, but that one is the grand prize winner.


7 posted on 03/06/2012 3:15:45 PM PST by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett

And this is news why?


8 posted on 03/06/2012 3:29:36 PM PST by weeweed (Proud Costco University graduate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett

Judaism has abandoned scripture for tradition which leads to abominations like this. Jews, especially their leaders, are supposed to know the difference between clean and unclean —holy and common. They obsess over whether it is OK to turn on a light on the Sabbath, while remaining in the dark always when it comes to the meaning of scriptures. Many keep separate dishes for meat and milk and never let them be together in the same meal, just to keep tradition. But they can’t, as a group, seem to separate truth from error when it comes to politics and morality.

Of course I am speaking generally, not about every Jew.


12 posted on 03/06/2012 4:07:03 PM PST by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett

This practice is weirdo horse manure. It needs to end.


13 posted on 03/06/2012 4:08:15 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett
A lot of people really like the First Amendment -- until they encounter some religious practice that is "just wrong". Then all of a sudden religious freedom is supposed to take a backseat to ... 1) common sense 2) common decency 3) modern medicine 4) something else.

Personally, I think followers of a religion older than mine can go ahead and do what they want, whether I agree with it or not. It's not for me to say. Or for anyone to say.

14 posted on 03/06/2012 4:12:22 PM PST by ClearCase_guy ("And the public gets what the public wants" -- The Jam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett

Per Wikipedia, “The traditional reason for this procedure is to minimize the potential for postoperative complications”.

If its not commanded, then just do a non-oral circumcision. This is creepy, but I’d rather have orthodox Jews here than a muzzie within 10,000 miles of me.


15 posted on 03/06/2012 4:20:51 PM PST by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett

I think this mouth thing is barbaric and should be halted. It is not a necessary Jewish custom. Only a tiny group still do this.


18 posted on 03/06/2012 4:42:31 PM PST by Yaelle (Santorums 2012 - we need a STEADY conservative President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson