Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/29/2012 6:09:58 PM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: QT3.14

I’m shocked Chrissy in the video didn’t mention if this ‘discovery’ gave him a ‘tingle’ up his leg.


2 posted on 03/29/2012 6:11:35 PM PDT by QT3.14 (MSM has a TDD (Truth Deficit Disorder) as it pumps out Kulturkrap to the masses nnn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

I’m a high school drop out and I know its unconstitutional.


3 posted on 03/29/2012 6:11:52 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

I can’t wait to see the looks on these so called “journalists” faces when this thing is deemed unconstitutional.

It will be priceless.


4 posted on 03/29/2012 6:14:02 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Stick to what you are good at Chris....licking Obama’s boots.


5 posted on 03/29/2012 6:14:25 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

As do all liberals, especially those on TV. Can the liberals just give an honest statement? Not on MSNBC!


6 posted on 03/29/2012 6:14:54 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

I’m pretty surprised to learn that Chris Matthews can remember how to breathe air.


7 posted on 03/29/2012 6:15:10 PM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Up till now the only thing Little Chrissie knew that was unconstitutional was keeping and bearing arms....


10 posted on 03/29/2012 6:19:38 PM PDT by Feckless (I was trained by the US << This Tagline Censored by FR >> ain't that irOnic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14; All
Just think! The 85 essays called THE FEDERALIST were written to explain the Constitution to farmers in upstate New York and throughout the states. According to Jefferson, they were to be used in the University of Virginia Law School to train lawyers, along with Blackstone's Commentaries.

Had Matthews and the other so-called "progressives" understood the essential ideas of liberty expounded by Madison, Jay and Hamilton in those essays, they would not have "trouble" understanding why this mandate is "unconstitutional."

If one uses as a standard the intellectual arguments articulated in the debates of the 1787 Convention, and among the participants debating ratification of the proposed U. S. Constitution throughout the States in 1787-88, then what an embarrassing look into the mind and thought process of current Justice Kagan in some of her questions and statements!

Justice Breyer's nonsensical musings, when combined with those of Justice Kagan, should alarm every citizen who cherishes the Constitution's underlying principles, as articulated and explained by America's Founders and Framers of that Constitution's protections for liberty.

My post from another thread related to Kagan:

"Kagan: "'The exact same argument so, so that really reduces to the question of: why is a big gift from the federal government a matter of coercion?
"'In other words, the federal government is here saying: we’re giving you a boatload of money. There are no, is no matching funds requirement. There are no extraneous conditions attached to it.
"'It’s just a boatload of federal money for you to take and spend on poor people’s healthcare. It doesn’t sound coercive to me, I have to tell you.'"

This statement tells us everything we need to know about Justice Kagan's concept of "coercive power" versus "individual liberty" and the Constitution's protections for the latter.

America's Founders viewed "government" as "coercive" by nature.

America's Founders understood that "government" creates no money, has no money, and cannot "gift" money without first "taking" it from someone--a "coercive" act in itself.

Besides, this "boatload of money" is not "federal money." It is "the People's" money, and who is naive or uninformed enough to believe that "taking" it from the people, sending it to Washington, and then doling it out to the States is an efficient way to provide "poor people's health care"????

Oh, how far we have come from the genius and wisdom which gave birth to America's Constitution, America's liberty for all, and America's prosperity and greatness!!!

I hope that these members of the Supreme Court will understand that future generations of Americans and individuals all over the world, given the new technologies which enable them to study the Founders' ideas, will judge them by the Framers' standards, not by the standards of the so-called "progressive" politicians in this Administration.

"Ideas have Consequences" (Weaver). America's Founders' ideas produced freedom, opportunity, prosperity and plenty for hundreds of millions of oppressed people.

The "progressives'" ideas of redistribution (socialism) have produced approaching tyranny and oppression, mediocrity, and want, in every society where they have been tried.

11 posted on 03/29/2012 6:19:59 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Chris, I’m pretty surprised you have the capacity to learn anything.


12 posted on 03/29/2012 6:21:04 PM PDT by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Surprise me when it’s a done deal. I’m not counting any chickens before they’re hatched.


13 posted on 03/29/2012 6:21:15 PM PDT by MulberryDraw (Toilet paper, the poor man's gold. It will hold its value better than the dollar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

He meant Morning Constitution.

Pray for America


17 posted on 03/29/2012 6:24:56 PM PDT by bray (Power to We the People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
Chrissy would be surprised to find out playing "switch" (putting one finger in your nose and one in your butt and counting to three and switch) wasn't a good idea after 5 games
21 posted on 03/29/2012 6:32:57 PM PDT by Doogle (((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Chrissy was dreaming liberal goons could force all of us to buy a Volt.... I’m sure he thinks that’s constitutional too...


22 posted on 03/29/2012 6:34:59 PM PDT by GOPJ (Democrat-Media Complex - buried stories and distorted facts... freeper 'andrew' Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

CHRIS MATTHEWS; I’m pretty surprised to learn that the mandate might be unconstitutional

It would surprise him if the Gov. told him he had to buy a Chevy even if he didn’t want one.


25 posted on 03/29/2012 6:36:59 PM PDT by chainsaw (Sarah Palin is still my first choice to save the USA. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

He has tingling up his leg.


36 posted on 03/29/2012 6:48:25 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

I’m not at all surprised that the liberal media is surprised at the obvious. They are flat earthers who are so tunnel visioned they can’t see anything but the path up the bum of big government.


45 posted on 03/29/2012 6:54:29 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

I’m not at all surprised that Chrissy is surprised.

To call that dolt uninformed and ignorant is to be kind.


50 posted on 03/29/2012 6:55:35 PM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
quite the constitutional scholar Prissy is... NOT!!!
53 posted on 03/29/2012 7:03:56 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Only the ignorant and/or stupid would be “surprised”.


54 posted on 03/29/2012 7:07:30 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
The Hotair article mentions the distinct possibility that both the mandate and the overall legislation will be upheld on a 6-3 vote, with Kennedy (of course) and Roberts writing the decision as narrowly as possible to make sure this doesn't happen again for some other issue besides health-care (yeah, right).

It's realistic enough. Democrats have done a remarkably good job of putting left-wing ideologues on the high court who stick to their principles. Republicans, OTOH, must fight vicious attacks from the left on all of their nominees, several of whom have gone on to decide they were members of the left once they became SC justices. Kennedy is one of the biggest mistakes President Reagan ever made, and Roberts putting his stamp of approval on this grotesque expansion of federal power would be perfectly in keeping with the likes of Souter, John Paul Stevens, Harry Blackmun, William Brennan...
57 posted on 03/29/2012 7:21:54 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson