Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama issues stern language on Supreme Court health care decision (Sit down Napoleon!)
Yahoo News ^ | 04/02/2012 | Rachel Rose Hartman

Posted on 04/02/2012 1:49:33 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway

President Obama on Monday issued stern language to the Supreme Court of the United States regarding his health care law, expressing confidence "Obamacare" will not be overturned by the nation's highest court. "I'm confident this will be upheld because it should be upheld," the president said Monday afternoon at a White House press conference that included ‪Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexican President Felipe Calderon, who are attending the North American Leaders' Summit. The president said overturning the law would be "an unprecedented and extraordinary step" and compared the court's rejection of the law to "judicial activism."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: bullyinchief; dicktater; dictatorinchief; jackass; kagan; narcissistinchief; obama; obamacare; obamapoleon; obameltdown; scotus; separationofpowers; tyrantinchief; waronscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: LucyT
If SCOTUS strikes nocare down, start listening for calls to impeach the most conservative members of the Court. Of course, calls for impeachment mean nothing unless the dems win back the House.
Until then it is nothing more than rhetoric.

Either way, I believe the groundwork is being laid for this very purpose.

41 posted on 04/03/2012 9:05:24 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
The president said overturning the law would be "an unprecedented and extraordinary step"...
No it wouldn't.

...compared the court's rejection of the law to "judicial activism."
It isn't that either.

He can't even make salient points without a teleprompter.

42 posted on 04/03/2012 9:10:06 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Yulee

Great post - except that it should read...

“The Supreme Court is appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, both which in turn had been selected by the voters on election day.”

Congress doesn’t appoint Supreme Court Justices - the House specifically has zero role in that regard.


43 posted on 04/03/2012 9:17:13 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!; LucyT

Elena told him within minutes after she knew what the vote was.

He lost 6-3 (conjecture).

He’s furious. He’s trying to intimidate them prior to the final decision.


44 posted on 04/03/2012 9:19:40 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Heck, Elena’s cellphone was probably sitting innocently on the table as the justices discussed and voted.


45 posted on 04/03/2012 12:05:42 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson