Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questions the worthless MSM(Media) should be asking Obama on Judicial Activism and Restraint
4/5/2012 | sickoflibs

Posted on 04/05/2012 10:06:56 AM PDT by sickoflibs

Obama recent statements on the US Supreme Court Judicial Review:

Obama: “ I'd just remind conservative commentators that for years what we've heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint — that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law,” Obama said. “Well, this is a good example. And I'm pretty confident that this court will recognize that and not take that step.
...... and.......
Obama: “’I am confident,” announced the president of the United States, “that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.

Of course a number of those ‘democratically elected Congress’ members that passed it were bribed (with special $$$ for their states) with the taxpayer money to get their votes : Nelson , Sanders, Landrieu and others. And don’t forget that Justice Kagan wrote the Obama-care legal defense that she is ruling on.
If we had an independent watch-dog media they would be asking the Obama the following questions on his views on Judicial Activism and Restraint:

Should the ‘unelected justices’ overturn The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”?

Should the ‘unelected justices’ re-write the state’s traditional marriage Laws that have been constitutional for hundreds of years?

Should the ‘unelected justices’ overturn Arizona’s immigration enforcement laws passed by a majority of the state legislators?

Should the ‘unelected justices’ overturn states voter ID laws passed by a majority of the state legislators in various states?

Would the so called ‘conservative justices’ ruling to overturn Obama-care sit better with you if they first wrote the law-suit against it before being appointed to the court to rule on it (just as justice Kagan wrote your defense)?

I am sure there are many more examples I can’t put my finger on this morning. Obama doesn’t believe half of what he says and I wrote the above to illustrate it.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: courtsobama; enemedia; mediabias; msm; obama; obamacare; obamedia; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

RESPECTFULLY.....pretty please?? Aw....pretty please?


21 posted on 04/05/2012 12:41:07 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
” Thanks, don’t ya wish we had a party on OUR side who had a clue?”

****************

Don't ya wish we had a CONSERVATIVE MEDIA OUTLET on our side?

Fox News has become a little squishy on conservative issues. They are no longer the fire-breathing conservatives we once respected.

That being said ... isn't there a conservative "sugar daddy" who could launch a REAL conservative media outlet (TV or cable, since we already have radio and web outlets) that would hold FIRMLY to conservative positions? Maybe with classes on the Constitution and plenty of Judge Napolitano?

I feel like we're wandering in the liberal wilderness without a star to guide us, while the libs have Ed Shultz & Co.

22 posted on 04/05/2012 1:26:46 PM PDT by DNME (Paging SARAH PALIN! Please pick up any white courtesy phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DNME; stephenjohnbanker; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; NFHale; Gilbo_3
RE :”Don't ya wish we had a CONSERVATIVE MEDIA OUTLET on our side?
Fox News has become a little squishy on conservative issues. They are no longer the fire-breathing conservatives we once respected

I dont have the romantic recollection on this that you do.

2009 to 2010 FNC tolerated the Tea Party, Beck, etc to use against Democrats. After the 2010 election FNC found principled conservatives like them about as useful as Democrats (MSNBC too) found Cindy Sheenan after the 2006 election. She never got invited back again ansd Beck got canned from FNC.

FNC is the Republican channel and MSNBC is the Democrat channel. Both will tolerate their activist base as long as they are useful to the party, and not critical of it.

I still like Neil Cavuto alot. Brett Baur does a good job too.

23 posted on 04/05/2012 1:43:22 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : "I will just make insurance companies give you health care for 'free, What Mandates??' ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; DNME; stephenjohnbanker; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; NFHale; Gilbo_3

I quit watching Fox about 4 years ago. I don’t watch any TV news. Fox caved, so what is to watch?


24 posted on 04/05/2012 1:50:23 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Cavuto is a good man, though.


25 posted on 04/05/2012 2:01:07 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Thanks for the ping.


26 posted on 04/05/2012 4:06:35 PM PDT by GOPJ (Hoodies - because you can't kill a security camera for snitchin' - - freeper tacticalogic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
RESPECTFULLY.....pretty please?? Aw....pretty please?

You know, when I read the text I thought it sounded weak, but when I heard the audio, McConnell sounded like he was saying the word "respectfully" in a kind of mocking tone.

Of course, I would not trust McConnell in all cases, but in this instance I think he said the right thing.

27 posted on 04/05/2012 7:20:17 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Where has he been for 3 years?

How many atrocities has he ignored?


28 posted on 04/05/2012 7:23:12 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Did you like it ?? I nailed the MSM for you. They are at the top of your list.


29 posted on 04/05/2012 8:56:33 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : "I will just make insurance companies give you health care for 'free, What Mandates??' ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
I did like it - you did nail them... I like, I like, I like... especially, "Would the so called ‘conservative justices’ ruling to overturn Obama-care sit better with you if they first wrote the law-suit against it before being appointed to the court to rule on it (just as justice Kagan wrote your defense)?

Kagan should remove herself from this proceeding - - conflict of interest... she needs to be asked about that...

30 posted on 04/06/2012 7:09:00 AM PDT by GOPJ (Hoodies - because you can't kill a security camera for snitchin' - - freeper tacticalogic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson