Black Panthers, Neo Nazis and Easter (New Black Panthers = New Black KKK)

Townhall.com ^ | Apr 08, 2012 | Lincoln Brown

[BerryDingle]

If it’s OK for the New Black Klan to be there in Sanford, what is wrong with the Neo-Nazis being there?

[hosepipe]

No need to Honkify this guy...
His horn is blaring...

Who was that Honkified Zimmerman.. and stirred race tensions?..
Who was that?.. Several people and groups or one person?..

SOMEBODY should be SLAPPED HARD with a personal destruction suit..
AND THEN.. sued for public endangerment...

[Kickass Conservative]

The KKK had Hoods.
The New Black Panthers have Hoodies.

Same Hate, different Pigment. Of course the one glaring difference is the establishment of Hate Crime Laws that only impact one segment of Society, the Caucasian Race.

I remember the good old days when Hate was a Motive, not a Thought Crime, or should I say a White Man's Thought Crime?

I fear for the Republic.

[cloudmountain]

First time I heard of their “bounty” on Zimmerman, I was listening to some Black Panther on one of the networks stating they were well on the way to accumulating $1 million for the bounty. Guess if they collected more than $10k the excess contributions have been “diverted” to other worthwhile causes.

Diverted....hahaha, yeah the Corleones got a lot of divertahs.

[4rcane]

When I first heard the neo nazi were patrolling Florida story, my immediate reaction was, how convenient for the left storyline. To me, neo nazi are leftist plants, who pretend to be racist Conservatives, who we know don’t exist

[4rcane]

Neo Nazi are leftists plants imho. I don’t think they really exist. They’re leftist pretending to be racist to drive up racial tension to blame it on Conservatives

[dps.inspect]

You have a vendetta complex or what? I’m talking about your fact checking in the post you made today... you respond to what it is I’m drawing your attention to by citing FBI stats, then you call me Jamal... dude take a nap and try again tomorrow... if you’r going to be a journalist, the first rule is, get the facts straight. If you fancy yourself a commentator on the facts, get your facts straight... if your leading with your pent up emotion, apply for a job at MSNBC, they have an opening there every other month...

[E. Pluribus Unum]

I have no freaking idea what you are talking about, Jamal.

The first post of mine that you responded to had no fact-checking required. My first post said we should call the New Black Panthers the New Black KKK.

Go check your facts, Jamal.

[dps.inspect]

Dude what's up with this "Jamal" stuff, don't quite get that; is that something like a black man calling another black man an Uncle Tom or something?

The first line of your post reads, "Literally as I write this piece today police are on a manhunt in Tulsa, Oklahoma for a white man who is accused of killing five black men"... When you state that wrote you wrote your piece "today", (which I assume was yesterday the 8th of April) police had already arrested two white men, and three black people, not five, had died. If per chance you wrote your piece earlier in the week, that should have been mentioned rather than "today".

If you want to be taken seriously, and I think you do, you must pay attention to the details of the facts. If in the first sentence of your piece a reader immediately questions the writers knowledge of the facts, how is he supposed to take seriously the rest of what is written... all I'm sayin'...

Sincerely, Mr Jamal...

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Jamal,

I did not write the article.

I merely posted it.

Try to get two of those tiny brain cell of yours connected to one another.

Regards.