Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Would a Romney-Gingrich ticket be acceptable to Jim Robinson & other conservative Freepers? [NO!! ]
[Not only no, but HELL NO!! NEVER AGAIN!! - Jim] | April 9, 2012 | Ralph Mitchell

Posted on 04/09/2012 8:06:05 AM PDT by mitchell001

Since Newt Gingrich is talking teamwork and cooperation with Romney & Santorum to defeat Obama, would Jim Robinson and conservative Free Republic people join me in accepting and pushing a Romney-Gingrich ticket. Frankly, I bristle at the mention of Romney-Nicki Halley or other RINO tickets. Personally, Romney would be very smart to put conservatives at the table of his campaign and administration team. Newt is so passionate about Big Ideas, reform and he knows how to push the levers of Congress. Mitt Romney can be a good president, however, with Newt on his team, Mitt Romney could be a great president. We need Gingrich's brains and political skill on the ticket and in the administration.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chevyvoltrepublican; gingrich; robinson; romney; santorum; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-237 next last
To: mitchell001
I've drawn my line in the sand and I cannot and will not vote for Romney under any circumstance whatsoever, period.

Things are going to get very interesting around here when/if Mitt gets the nod, however the substantial female has yet to yodel.

I see a 3rd party groundswell very possible, led by someone very powerfully conservative.

If the GOP nominates Mitt it needs to die a swift death.

201 posted on 04/09/2012 11:07:15 AM PDT by Manic_Episode (Politics is fake. I think it's owned by Vince Mcmahon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances

Thanks for posting this analysis,very enlightening.Of course many won’t listen.


202 posted on 04/09/2012 11:14:25 AM PDT by hoosierham (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode
From the WikiPedia entry for Whig Party (United States):
The election of 1852 marked the beginning of the end for the Whigs. The deaths of Henry Clay and Daniel Webster that year severely weakened the party. The Compromise of 1850 fractured the Whigs along pro- and anti-slavery lines, with the anti-slavery faction having enough power to deny Fillmore the party's nomination in 1852. The Whig Party's 1852 convention in New York City saw the historic meeting between Alvan E. Bovay and The New York Tribune's Horace Greeley, a meeting which led to correspondence between the men as the early Republican Party meetings in 1854 began to take place. Attempting to repeat their earlier successes, the Whigs nominated popular General Winfield Scott, who lost decisively to the Democrats' Franklin Pierce. The Democrats won the election by a large margin: Pierce won 27 of the 31 states including Scott's home state of Virginia. Whig Representative Lewis D. Campbell of Ohio was particularly distraught by the defeat, exclaiming, "We are slain. The party is dead—dead—dead!" Increasingly politicians realized that the party was a loser. Abraham Lincoln, its Illinois leader, for example, ceased his Whig activities and attended to his law business.
Will history repeat itself in 2012?
203 posted on 04/09/2012 11:14:31 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

FUMR and the RINOs you rode in on!!


204 posted on 04/09/2012 11:17:05 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is not just brewing, rebellion is here!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

“Will history repeat itself in 2012?”

2013.


205 posted on 04/09/2012 11:44:27 AM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

There only difference between the Republican Party and the Democrat Party is the $$$ price tag.


206 posted on 04/09/2012 11:48:29 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Whatever new conservative party that rises from the ashes of the Republican party had better make sure they keep all the RINOs out. The Romneys, McConnells and weepers can butt out!


207 posted on 04/09/2012 11:49:54 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: onceone
Obama, Inc is just a more aggressive version of the RNC. I refuse to be the RNC's version of the DNC's Holder's people.

In it's wildest dream (or our nightmare) the RNC - despite it's heavy-handedness and clumsiness; could not come close to matching the evil that so defines the Obama-Holder policical machine. OMG. . .not even close; on RNC's best day.

Nor; and most importantly; are any Repubs - RINO's or otherwise - competing against Obama/Holder; for the distinction of remaking America is such a heinous image as what these radicals are attempting per their 'refashioning' the face of America.

208 posted on 04/09/2012 11:50:16 AM PDT by cricket (. It is more than the economy. . .and Newt knows it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

That is why the DNC and MSM both want Romney. The Dems can attack him on homosexuality, while the religious right can attack him for being Mormon.

This is also the idiocy of the GOP leadership. They pushed Romney as the most electable candidate, when in reality is fairly unelectable with strong opposition from both sides. He should still win the presidency due to the economy, but it will be much closer than if the idiotic country club GOP leadership didn’t select Romney.

But yes, should conservatives repeat what happend with John McCain, and not come out to vote or vote 3rd party, then yes we get another 4 years of Obama.

I guarantee that a 2nd Obama administration will be FAR more permanently damaging to the structure of American law and society than anything he did in the first term (except Obamacare, which is catastrophic for us).


209 posted on 04/09/2012 11:51:12 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (REPEAL OBAMACARE. Nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: cricket

The old joke is that the Democrats propose to tear down the Washington Monument, and the Republicans respond with a workable plan to do it in three stages.

It’s amazing how often these days that joke fits what we’re seeing.


210 posted on 04/09/2012 11:53:31 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (You can be a Romney Republican or you can be a conservative. You can't be both. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: JDoutrider
"A brokered convention is our only hope. Romney is unacceptable to anyone who loves this country."

That could be our only & last hope. We need to unite on choosing PALIN/WEST or PALIN/A REAL CONSERVATIVE.

Taking back the GOP is a hopeless cause. Too many states keep voting in the old dogs & they keep poisoning the well. We need to start from scratch with a new party & kill the present GOP that keeps enslaving us.They are clamping down on the newly elected Tea Party members & the whole bunch of them have to be thrown out.. but since they keep getting voted back in - a new party is our only choice, as I see it.

2012 is the time to start - so we need a real discussion on how we are going to do this. Maybe it needs a special thread instead of hashing over the candidates running now.

We can't forgot that Ron Paul has delegates that he will throw to Romney in order to get his son in on the act.

SO!! who is our idea man to get this started? We don't have any time to waste!!!!

211 posted on 04/09/2012 11:53:49 AM PDT by LADY J (You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have. - Author Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
I guarantee that a 2nd Obama administration will be FAR more permanently damaging to the structure of American law and society than anything he did in the first term (except Obamacare, which is catastrophic for us).

I can think of something far more damaging: A conservative movement that has become so bereft of principle that it will support the most liberal governor in history, Mitt Romney. Now THAT is dangerous!

212 posted on 04/09/2012 11:56:37 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (You can be a Romney Republican or you can be a conservative. You can't be both. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
Whatever new conservative party that rises from the ashes of the Republican party had better make sure they keep all the RINOs out. The Romneys, McConnells and weepers can butt out!

and Lindsay Graham!

213 posted on 04/09/2012 11:59:29 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Do I really need a /s tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Agreed. At first they will be disdainful, then the ones who have not openly shifted to the Democrats will want in. Just as the voodoo Republicans slithered into the Reagan administration when it was ascendant.


214 posted on 04/09/2012 12:02:29 PM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

U left out possible CW II


215 posted on 04/09/2012 12:40:32 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
"I guarantee that a 2nd Obama administration will be FAR more permanently damaging to the structure of American law and society than anything he did in the first term (except Obamacare, which is catastrophic for us)."

I don't disagree that a 2nd term of Zero would be destructive. I just want to add that RINOmney at the helm of the Republican Party would be damaging as well.

Some of the following is borrowed from FReepers who posted thoughts. I took them to write out my own thoughts. I apologize to them that I didn't save their names to credit them here:

This quote by Hamilton says where I've come down after a lot of soul searching ...

“If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.”

It is a terrible situation for the Republicans to find themselves in this year. Unfortunately, some of them in the primaries just listen to what candidates say and not look at what they've done when in office.

I intend to vote for conservatives, as always, wherever I find them. Willard is not one of them.

216 posted on 04/09/2012 12:42:49 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (I wouldnÂ’t vote for Romney for dog catcher if he was in a three way race against Lenin and Marx!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

"You finally really did it. You maniacs! You didn't vote for Romney! God damn you! God damn you all to hell!"


217 posted on 04/09/2012 12:47:37 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: caww
I agree. Boehner is nothing more than Trent Lott/Bill Frist redux. Frist was so ineffective, I had up look up his name.

My contention is that if the GOP holds the Oval Office and at least one body of Congress, we will be in a much better position to fight the elite and the Country Club network.

I would rather not take five steps back for one step forward.

Just my opinion FWIW. (not much)

218 posted on 04/09/2012 12:49:00 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

Without a conservative at the top of the ticket.....there’s nothing left in 2016 for Jebby anyway. The Union will not survive the ongoing raping . You’d think they’d have figured that out by now.


219 posted on 04/09/2012 12:55:58 PM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001; All
All these pro-Mitt comments and dire threats and putdowns to real conservatives were said or posted on FR before. Remember: pro-Dole, pro-Dubya and pro-McCain

What were the results: Clinton then Obama. Do you see a pattern?

Remember when we all thought it couldn't get worse than Clinton?

Well, if we vote for Mitt, IT WILL GET WORST THAN OBAMA. The next Obama has already been picked by Soros and friends.

Take a stand now while you still have a vote. No Mitt. No more retreat!

220 posted on 04/09/2012 1:05:55 PM PDT by donna (This is the age of Republican-Feminism. We "feel right” has replaced being right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-237 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson