Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Conservatives Have Lost the Political Battle for America’s Soul
The Tea Party Economist ^ | April 18, 2012 | Gary North

Posted on 04/19/2012 12:14:56 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: rarestia
Would it be harmful to discuss an orderly secession of States no longer willing to take part in the contemporary Federal government? Is it legal?

No, but it would be a waste of time, since most of the states that people talk about seceding are close to going Democrat within the next decade or so, and there would not be a clear majority supporting it in most of them. There are those who think that as long as 51% are okay with secession, that's all that matters, but by forcing the other 49% to along with it, they'd be no better than the very government they are trying to avoid.

I'm in Texas, and I always get a good laugh out of the "Secede" license plates, since Texas is already minority-majority, and soon Hispanics will be the largest group. Secession wouldn't work out too well for us.
21 posted on 04/19/2012 3:25:22 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
America’s epitaph will read: United States of America, 1775 - 2012. Cause of death: voter stupidity.

No, voter apathy. Although apathy could be just another word for stupidity in this case.
22 posted on 04/19/2012 3:25:58 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sand88
I have nothing but utter contempt for those of any party who worship at the Alter of State Power. For they are enemies of our Constitution and enemies of God. If they succeed in destroying all we have, then I pray they are shown no mercy when our Republic rises from the ashes. May ALL the politicians of today, all the judges, all the sadistic workers at the EPA and other Federal agencies be put in non air-conditioned prisons out West breaking big rocks into little rocks for a long time. As added punishment, may they have to endure looking at nightly repeats of Sarah's acceptance speech at the GOP convention in 08 :) [Her speech totally annoyed Statists of all stripes -- I loved it]

Agreed, doubly so for the EPA people.
23 posted on 04/19/2012 5:47:02 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

States rights started it’s death throes during a stormy overcast July about 1 mile south of a small whistle-stop PA town in 1863. It took 3 days to finish the job.


24 posted on 04/19/2012 6:01:15 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
America’s epitaph will read: United States of America, 1775 - 2012 1865. Cause of death: voter stupidity Lincoln and Northern arrogance.

Fixed.

25 posted on 04/19/2012 6:04:21 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

Didn’t Henry Wallace later renounce his liberalism and endorse that liberal Richard Nixon in 1968?


26 posted on 04/19/2012 9:23:40 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
Does the writer and his ignorant interviewee not remember someone named Ronald Reagan? Margaret Thatcher? Karol Józef Wojtya?

Things are not the same today

Demographics is destiny

Even if Gas was $9.00 a gallon and Inflation and Unemployment were 30%+ a Ronald Reagan would still lose California, New York and Illinois and many other states.

Within 10 years the same will be able to be said of Texas

America was mortally wounded in 1965 with Ted Kennedy's Immigration and Nationality Act,

27 posted on 04/19/2012 9:28:05 PM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

He’s popular over on Lew Rockwell, one of those “not welcome on FR” sites:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north-arch.html

http://www.google.com/search?q=Gary+North

He cites the late Paul Weyrich, and I found this interesting, in light of the former FReeper and moonbat Willie Green:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Weyrich#Rail_transit_activism

Rail transit activism

In contrast with many conservatives, Weyrich had a long history of ardent support for rail mass transit.[12][13] He opposed “Bus rapid transit”,[14] (a particular type of bus transit with higher capacity but also higher costs than ordinary bus transit), and instead supported rail transit as a more effective alternative. In 1988 he co-founded a quarterly magazine on the subject of urban rail transit, called The New Electric Railway Journal, which until 1996 was published by FCF, and he was its Publisher.[15] He wrote an opinion column for most issues and contributed a few feature articles. FCF discontinued its affiliation with TNERJ in 1996, but the magazine continued being produced, under a different publishing company,[15] until the end of 1998, with Weyrich listed as “Publisher Emeritus”. In early 2000,[16] about a year after the last magazine was published, Weyrich and William S. Lind (who had been the magazine’s Associate Publisher until 1996) launched a website where they could continue to post their views and news about rail transit. They called the webpage “The New New Electric Railway Journal”,[16] and Weyrich wrote numerous op-ed columns in favor of proposed light rail and metro systems. He also supported bringing back streetcars to U.S. cities.[17]

Weyrich also served on the national board of Amtrak (1987-1993)[18] and the Amtrak Reform Council, as well as on local and regional rail transit advocacy organizations.

Thanks Tolerance Sucks Rocks.


28 posted on 04/20/2012 6:56:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Didn’t Henry Wallace later renounce his liberalism and endorse that liberal Richard Nixon in 1968?

If he did I'm unaware of it, and I'd be hard put to explain, if it's the same Henry Wallace, why a lifelong Red would endorse the consummate and preeminent anticommunist politician of his day.

29 posted on 04/20/2012 10:20:07 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus; Theodore R.
Theodore R. appears to remember correctly.

From Wikipedia, FWIW:

In 1950, when North Korea invaded South Korea, Wallace broke with the Progressives and backed the U.S.-led war effort in the Korean War.[5] In 1952, Wallace published Where I Was Wrong, in which he explained that his seemingly-trusting stance toward the Soviet Union and Joseph Stalin stemmed from inadequate information about Stalin's excesses and that he, too, now considered himself an anti-Communist. He wrote various letters to "people who he thought had traduced (maligned) him" and advocated the re-election of President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956.[5]

In 1961, President-elect John F. Kennedy invited him to his inauguration ceremony, though he had supported Kennedy's opponent Richard Nixon. A touched Wallace wrote to Kennedy: "At no time in our history have so many tens of millions of people been so completely enthusiastic about an Inaugural Address as about yours."[5]

I learned something, too.

30 posted on 04/20/2012 10:31:44 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Thanks for the post. Perhaps Comrade Stalin sent Wallace a typical Stalin gift ... a brand-new pistol, his present to failed generals during World War II. (Khrushchev was his delivery boy for that particular sort of political errand.)

Wallace was a raring-to-go Red in the 30's. Be interesting to know what, if anything, changed his mind -- other than HUAC breathing down his neck.

31 posted on 04/21/2012 1:43:37 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Wallace's professed (if you can trust it) change of heart later -- assuming it's any good, arguendo -- does not say anything about what Wallace would have done, or how he would have governed, had he become President during the War.
32 posted on 04/21/2012 1:53:11 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: qam1
America was mortally wounded in 1965 with Ted Kennedy's Immigration and Nationality Act

So, we don't just lie there and bleed out and wait for the guy with the chalk. We get our butt to a hospital, get help, heal up, and then go looking with a bunch of our friends for the guy who cut us.

And we solve our social problem.

33 posted on 04/21/2012 1:57:19 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson